I use sendmail with procmail and dovecot on our systems, although I
don't specifically do ssl because I only allow mail to be delivered to
local users from untrusted networks.
Jon
On 26 February 2012 01:13, Claus Assmann
ml+openindiana-disc...@esmtp.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012, Hans J.
My setup is a bit more complicated, but I've been running this setup
(with tweaks and changes) since the early 90s on a sparc IPC.
Dovecot, qmail (with patches), mailfront, spamdyke, spamassassin,
sslserver, tcpserver. I use two interfaces... port 25 with full spam
control, and port 587
Is it at all possible to do per packet load balancing in openindiana?
ie can one do
dladm create-aggr -P smth -l igp0 -l igp1 1
and somehow manage to get (near) 2gb for, say, a zfs send over aggr1?
Or would one have to write some session-splitting sw to pipe the data thru?
--
Skickat från min
Hans J Albertsson wrote:
Is it at all possible to do per packet load balancing in openindiana?
ie can one do
dladm create-aggr -P smth -l igp0 -l igp1 1
and somehow manage to get (near) 2gb for, say, a zfs send over aggr1?
Or would one have to write some session-splitting sw to pipe the
I have a pools setup named tank1 with multiple datasets/filesystems
defined. At the top, I have tank1/media followed by tank1/media/Video
and tank1/media/Music. I've setup tank1/media as a nfs share
(e.g. /export/media) and can mount it from other systems. When I try to
access media/Video from
Scott LeFevre wrote:
I have a pools setup named tank1 with multiple datasets/filesystems
defined. At the top, I have tank1/media followed by tank1/media/Video
and tank1/media/Music. I've setup tank1/media as a nfs share
(e.g. /export/media) and can mount it from other systems. When I try to
On 2/27/2012 11:32 AM, James Carlson wrote:
Scott LeFevre wrote:
I have a pools setup named tank1 with multiple datasets/filesystems
defined. At the top, I have tank1/media followed by tank1/media/Video
and tank1/media/Music. I've setup tank1/media as a nfs share
(e.g. /export/media) and can
Doug,
Thanks for the info. My client is NFSv3. I tested w/ a NFSv4 client
and it works as I wanted/expected.
Cheers,
Scott LeFevre
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:39 -0500, Doug Hughes wrote:
On 2/27/2012 11:32 AM, James Carlson wrote:
Scott LeFevre wrote:
I have a pools setup named tank1
Hi,
I have configured my OI_151 installation with a static IPv4 address and
would like to configure IPv6 to work with DHCP but the notes I've found
appear to require nwam to be running but I have disabled this.
I would appreciate a suggestion on how to configure OI manually to only
use DHCP
russell wrote:
Hi,
I have configured my OI_151 installation with a static IPv4 address and
would like to configure IPv6 to work with DHCP but the notes I've found
appear to require nwam to be running but I have disabled this.
Might be helpful to provide a link or a copy of those notes.
Is configuring these things through nwam not the /proper/ way to do things?
I don't understand why all the help pages say to disable nwam for static IP
configuration.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 15:58, James Carlson carls...@workingcode.comwrote:
russell wrote:
Hi,
I have configured my OI_151
You have (service names from an earlier release, may not be identical):
EITHER
svc:/network/physical:nwam
OR
svc:/network/physical:default
Only one of those can be used. The first tries to Do The Right Thing,
automagically (including DHCP and all that); the second is for a
straightforward
I was figuring out nwam last night, and it looks as though you can push
network profiles based on user. But I could be totally off on that, I
didn't investigate further than the mention of it.
Something like that, I can see being very useful on a server assuming non
admins are logging into it for
13 matches
Mail list logo
