Message: 7
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:03:13 +0400
From: Jim Klimovjimkli...@cos.ru
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject:
Message-ID:50901661.9050...@cos.ru
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2012-10-30 19:21, Sebastian
2012-10-31 13:58, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
2012-10-30 19:21, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
Whereas that's relative: performance is still at a quite miserable 62
MB/s through a gigabit link. Apparently, my environment has room for
improvement.
Does your gigabit ethernet use Jumbo Frames (like 9000 or
On 10/30/12 13:03, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
I see sometimes people linking with -lpthread (do NOT use -pthread),
without setting -mt for the Sun Studio compilers, see, e.g.,
the Parrot (OI 151a7) config:
/usr/lib/parrot/3.6.0/tools/lib/Parrot/Config/Generated.pm
This is wrong and should
Rich fixed the account for me (thanks Rich!)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Matthews [mailto:ja...@broken.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:01 AM
To: 'Discussion list for OpenIndiana'
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] bad mutex crash?
I will take a shot in the dark here. I
2012-10-30 19:21, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
Whereas that's relative: performance is still at a quite miserable
62
MB/s through a gigabit link. Apparently, my environment has room for
improvement.
Does your gigabit ethernet use Jumbo Frames (like 9000 or up to 16KB,
depending on your
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the step in the next time. That project look like very good with a
lot of good
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ...
We don't have time or resources to support a Gnome 2 desktop system
development fork (at least I don't and I
On 10/31/2012 9:49 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
Thanks a lot for this info, it's a pity that this isn't documented
well, I also read the Multithread Guide
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5137/compile-74765/index.html
and it's all not entirely complete nor completely consistent...
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:27 PM, låzaro netad...@lex-sa.cu wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the step
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:27:59 -0400, låzaro netad...@lex-sa.cu wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:35:02 +
From: t12nsloo...@gmail.com
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
Mate is a fork of Gnome 2 that already has a community behind it. Mint
features Mate as a key desktop choice.
http://mate-desktop.org/
except that Mate looks nothing like Gnome 2 ... so if the idea is to
keep the look and feel of the current environment then Mate is not the
way to go.
We'd
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop
and most developed environment which is accepted by the current or
potential user base.It would not be the correct choice
going with a project which either peters out or is not accepted by
commercial users as this would
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:25:13 +, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
As an Enterprise system the commercial view should prevail?
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
___
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:25 AM, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop and
most developed environment which is accepted by the current or potential
user base.It would not be the correct choice
going with a project which
On 1 November 2012 02:33, mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
+1. There are alot of very useful desktop operating systems already,
so i see no point in OI trying to compete with them. In business
speak OI
So why OI has DE at all? Leading to your logic community has to cut off
DE from distribution at all... And what we will have? Another one
illumos based server distribution?!
I see OI as OS for general purposes, so stopping development in DE will
decrease value of OI. Yes, community is to
I never suggested stopping DE development. I merely suggested that thinking of
OI as an enterprise desktop OS is trying to sell an idea that enterprises
aren't going to buy. I'm actually going to switch from Mac to OI laptop after
the holidays (getting crazier with age).
Sent from my
A GUI is only needed when you want to use the gui
I see more benefit in better webmin-support for zfs, mysql and other
serversoftware.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 31 okt. 2012 om 23:30 heeft Julius Roberts hooliowobb...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On 1 November 2012 02:33,
On 1 November 2012 09:48, Maxim Kondratovich maxim@gmail.com wrote:
So why OI has DE at all? Leading to your logic community has to cut off DE
from distribution at all... And what we will have? Another one illumos based
server distribution?!
The community will do whatever the community
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:25:13 +, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
As an Enterprise system the commercial view should prevail?
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
I would take
webmin?
Ick. Swapping a desktop gui for a web gui...still get a gui.
So just offshore the gui problem eh?
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 06:55 AM, Roel_D wrote:
A GUI is only needed when you want to use the gui
I see more benefit in better webmin-support for zfs, mysql and other
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:01 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:25 AM, openbabelopenba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop and
most developed environment which is accepted by the current or potential
user base.It
WindowMaker sounds good. Used it for a while a few years ago. Been thinking
about looking at it again. :)
--
Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus
Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:01 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at
I used WindowMaker for a couple years myself. It is an easy compile on
*Solaris and works well. At least it compiled easy for me.
I ultimately went back to OpenWindows. I own a large stock of Solaris
8 media, so I will never be without my OpenWindows packages.
Jerry Kemp
On 10/31/12 08:18
On Oct 31, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
2012-10-30 19:21, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
Whereas that's relative: performance is still at a quite miserable
62
MB/s through a gigabit link. Apparently, my environment has room for
improvement.
Does your gigabit
On Oct 31, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
2012-10-31 13:58, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
2012-10-30 19:21, Sebastian Gabler wrote:
Whereas that's relative: performance is still at a quite miserable 62
MB/s through a gigabit link. Apparently, my environment has room for
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@richardelling.com wrote:
On the target system I am seeing writes up to
160 MB/s with frequent zpool iostat probes. When iostat probes are up to
5s+, there is a steady stream of 62 MB/s.
I believe this *may* mean that your
28 matches
Mail list logo
