Hi Peter,
I believe that libjpeg-turbo ought to be a straight drop-in replacement for
> the older ijg jpeg library.
> That's the claim, and the limited testing I've done hasn't thrown up any
> obvious problems. Are you
> aware of any reason not to simply replace the old ijg libjpeg with the one
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Aurélien Larcher <
aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just FYI:
>
> http://www.openindiana.org/2015/12/14/update-of-jpeg-libraries/
I believe that libjpeg-turbo ought to be a straight drop-in replacement for
the older ijg jpeg library.
That's the claim, and the
Just FYI:
http://www.openindiana.org/2015/12/14/update-of-jpeg-libraries/
--
---
Praise the Caffeine embeddings
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Sent from my iPhone
This only mistake should just get you banned ! phjear ! \o\ /o/ \o\ /o/
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
>
> And as annoying as both may be, is it worse than making the list so hostile
> that
> the very small community you have shrinks even further because no one wants to
> participate at the risk of being flamed for their mail client? Su
