Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] libgnomeprintui-2.2
Hi, well, that is really question for Oracle, but yes, S11 removed libgnomeprintui, based on pkg.oracle.com info. Best regards, Milan (2,5 years out of Oracle) On út, 2014-07-22 at 11:44 -0300, Ron Dawson wrote: This is more of a Solaris 11 question than an OI question, but perhaps someone can help out. I've been trying to move an application from an old Solaris 10 SPARC V440 server to a newer T4 Sparc server running Solaris 11.1. The application has a libgnomeprintui-2.2 dependency. I have libgnomeprintui on all of my Solaris 10 (SPARC) systems and also on OI (x86) where I can recompile the application. I haven't had any luck finding libgnomeprintui-2.2 on Solaris 11.1 (SPARC). Has support for this library been dropped or am I just missing the correct set of packages? I couldn't find anything at all related to Gnome or GTK printing in the package manager. - Ron ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE repositories
Hi, there is plan always. But it depends on what you need to update there. Best regards, Milan On st, 2014-07-09 at 10:47 +0200, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: Hi, does anyone knows if there are plans to update SFE repositories? Packages there are bit outdated: http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe BTW, I have found that http://sfe.opencsw.org/localhostoi151a8/ repository contains also some SFE packages (vlc 2 for example, which works OK), but it has some overlapping with /sfe or /sfe-encumbered ones. Regards. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 151a9 missing gnome/locale/*
Hi, gnome/locale/XXX were obsoleted in a8, all content was moved directly to packages where belong (the reason why hipster has it OK now). But a9 was not built correctly by mistake, you have to use JDS bits from http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/ to have JDS with many fixes, including locales. I am not sure if there will be a10 any time soon, also my personal activity on JDS is very limited in last 2 months because I am thinking about migration to some OS with better desktop support than Illumos. Best regards, Milan On 13.06.2014 09:21, Richard PALO wrote: After upgrading one of our systems from a7 to a9, I came across the fact that gnome/locale/fr (actually all of them) is missing for a9, only up to a8 is available. seems to be an omission. Is it possible to get that quickly built and pushed, and/or is there a special cantation to force pkg to install the a8 version. richard@smicro:~$ pkg list -af gnome/locale/fr NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION IFO gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.8 --o gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.8 --o gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.7 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.6 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.5 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.4 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.3 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.2 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1.1 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.151.1 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.148 --- gnome/locale/fr 0.5.11-0.147 --- I *don't* like to copy from the a7 BE... (in hipster, it seems the locales revert to each proper package, for example gtk2, but not [yet] so in OI...) thanks in advance ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Problem with OpenIndiana Upgrade
Hi, gdk-pixbuf package was splitted in a9 from gtk2 package (because of upstream changes). Could you send output of pkg publisher command, please? Best regards, Milan On so, 2014-03-29 at 18:46 +, russell wrote: Hi, When I try to upgrade my normal OpenIndiana environment I get the following message These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-gdk-pixbuf-rendering.html: pkg://openindiana.org/library/desktop/gtk2@2.20.1,5.11-0.151.1.8:20130406T215741Z pkg://openindiana.org/library/desktop/gdk-pixbuf@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.1.9:20140117T202422Z Now I have checked and the pkg://openindiana.org/library/desktop/gdk-pixbuf@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.1.9:20140117T202422Z is not listed when I run pkg list -v I have removed the OpenSolaris packages, removed the repository, performed pkg rebuild-index and forced a package refresh but the mystery package is still complained about. If I try to remove it with pkg uninstall it can not be found. How can I upgrade to the latest release? TIA ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Install 151a8, upgrade to 151a9, and gnome system tools (top panel System - Admin menu) dump core.
Hi,
On pá, 2014-02-21 at 14:47 +0100, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 21/02/2014 14:37, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 21/02/2014 13:57, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
With a lot in common with the below complaint, I decided to try a std
OI151a9 install on my newly acquired N54L microserver:
This isn't ever going to be used for daily GUI logins, but it was there
and clean and pristine and fresh, so:
I installed from the 151a8 desktop DVD ISO
I logged in as the user you set up during install.
I did a pkg update as root, and then booted and logged in.
I installed gvfs, and checked gnome-vfs is installed, and that rad was
running as well as all the desktop related cache services.
I had already updated the loaders cache.
I also ran the crle {,-64} -c /var/ld{,/64} -l commands, rebooted
and logged in again.
Why are you modifying the runtime environment?
None of the System - Administration tools work!
? For me, this claim only holds for 'Users and Groups' and 'Time and
Date', which is a separate bug not resolved yet. All other system
admin tools work after root password.
Ok ok, network administration also belongs to the same kind
of bug, but the others are ok.
Posted a stacktrace of the issue on bug #4319 .
I am tracking the issue in communication between embedded_su and libgksu
which is the root cause.
Best regards,
Milan
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How do I upgrade from 151a7 to 151a9 ?
Hi, On pá, 2014-02-21 at 02:12 +0600, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote: Hi Milan, Is this considered a next release preview? pkg set-publisher-ghttp://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1/ --search-before=openindiana.org jds.openindiana.org jds.o.o is testing repo of bits which will be included in the next OI release (a10 currently). I hope. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How do I upgrade from 151a7 to 151a9 ?
Hi, could you describe your system configuration? What is in your ~/.xsession-errors ? If you do pkg verify then is your system OK? If you check output of pkg list, are all your packages on the latest versions? It means all components from system repository are on versions ending with -0.151.1.9 ? The key problem is if the only person who is working on JDS these days (I) can reproduce your problem on my systems. I cannot reproduce them. Give me hints how to reproduce it and I will do that. Yes, nobody has the idea why you have problems. If you are using standard desktop system then there should not be problems like you are describing. Best regards, Milan On st, 2014-02-19 at 15:44 +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: This is basically my7 experience, too. And noone seems to have any idea about why these Gnome problems ACTUALLY occur. On 2014-02-19 15:09, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote: Not to blame anyone, but IMO every next OI release becomes less stable than previous... The latest release which works stable for me is 151a7. 151a8 also worked, though I could not configure network interface using GUI tool in it (after disabling nwam and enabling default). Then 151a9 was released. After upgrading my 32-bit production server, it simply did not boot. It gone into infinite boot loop at the very early stage of the boot process. OK, who needs a decade-old 32-bit hardware (which though worked like a clockwork with 151a7, and had 3GB of RAM, not the very minimum)... I have upgraded my hardware. Now it is 64-bit. I have started from 151a7, not 8 (to avoid hassle with setting static IP address manually in various config files - I could miss something and spend much more time to do this simple setting). OK, 151a7 is working fine. Upgrading to 151a9... GNOME degraded. No upper toolbar, no lower status bar, no Nimbus theme, just background image and mouse pointer. Right-click menu is working though. There was an advice to reinstall gvfs. Tried in a test virtualbox setup. This worked in reverse! In /virtualbox/, 151a7 /successfully/ upgraded to 151a9. Though in vbox the upgrade went successfully, I have tried if reinstalling gvfs is safe (before trying it at production server). Booted into single user mode, log in as root, and did # pkg uninstall gvfs # pkg install gvfs And rebooted. What do you think? GNOME degraded. In the same way as in the production server. Reinstalling gvfs caused exactly the same symptoms which it intended to cure. If someone knows how to upgrade 151a7 to 151a9, please post step-by step instructions. Regards, Dmitry. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How do I upgrade from 151a7 to 151a9 ?
Hi, pkg set-publisher --non-sticky openindiana.org pkg set-publisher-g http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1/ --search-before=openindiana.org jds.openindiana.org pkg set-publisher --non-sticky sfe pkg set-publisher --non-sticky sfe-encumbered Best regards, Milan On st, 2014-02-19 at 20:55 +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Milan, I've so far NOT added your jds repo to my config; I can't make head or tails of how to do that, please elucidate! My publishers are currently set up as: PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI openindiana.orgorigin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/dev/ sfe origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/ sfe-encumbered origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered/ How should this be changed, and at what position should your repo be added?? On 2014-02-19 18:24, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, The key problem is if the only person who is working on JDS these days (I) can reproduce your problem on my systems. I cannot reproduce them. Give me hints how to reproduce it and I will do that. Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Could someone update the easytag tag editor to the latest version, 2.1.9?
Hi, if you mean in OI SFE then it is not so easy because it depends newer intltool then it is in OI. intltool has to be bumped at first. Best regards, Milan On po, 2014-02-03 at 16:53 +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: The current one, 2.1.7, has a few horrendous bugs that makes tags unusable quite often. TIA, if anyone can. I'm not sure you'd want me to try it. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bugs 4043 and 4067
Hi, On po, 2014-01-27 at 09:22 -0500, Stephen S. Jones wrote: OpenIndiana Community (OpenHoosiers?), Bugs #4043 and #4067 recently were classified as complete and were closed. From my perspective and through the most current updates, neither issue is resolved. I am not usre if you are insterested in #4042 or #4043. I can reproduce #4042 and did not investigate it yet. Currently I am not able to reproduce #4043 with a9. Also I cannot reproduce #4067 with a9. I hope to find some time in the next days to investigate it more. And it is 2 years already I was debugging RBAC related issues, so it takes time to refresh knowledge :-( Best regards, Milan My production hardware was running 151a7 and was updated last August to 151a8 until bugs 4042 and 4067 manifested themselves. I backed out to a Boot Environment (BE) of 151a8 which did not manifest the bugs. Since I cannot trust my productive hardware on unreliable updates, I have been testing updates on a VMWare virtual machine (vm). This vm was installed using oi-dev-151a8-live-x86.iso on about 20 December and updated using # pkg update -v. Still, as in late last August, USB drives can be mounted but not unmounted as me, the only user, logged-in in gnome. As root with su in the command-line, I can # umount /media/the-USB-drive. Likewise, no trash can appears on the bottom gnome panel on the Desktop. Neither Trash nor Computer can be accessed by their buttons under Places in a File Browser. Also, Computer cannot be accessed by its icon in the Main Toolbar of a File Browser. Other manifestations of the bugs exist including the ability to use alacarte to create and to edit gui launchers. As Predrag (wiki.oi on 25 Nov 2013), I am starting to believe that the errors are being caused by authorizations and privileges of the RBAC system. As Milan suggested to Gary in comments at the bottom of bug 4067, I checked my RBAC profiles. Issuing profiles reported that I do have Console User as well as Suspend to RAM, Suspend to Disk Brightness, CPU Power Management, Network Autoconf User, Basic Solaris User, and All. Experimenting, I also assigned to myself the profiles of Desktop Removable Media User, Primary Administrator, and Software Installation. The additional profiles had no effect. Issuing roles indicates that I have the role of root. I had been a Solaris user and system administrator from Solaris 2.5.1 through Solaris 10. I have been using OpenIndiana since 151a5. Unbeknownst to me at the time, RBAC became a regular part of Solaris with version 10. Here with OI 151a9, I am ill prepared to troubleshoot the effects of RBAC on various programs and operations. I hope that one of us OpenHoosiers with experience in RBAC can pursue bugs 4043 and 4067 again with the hypothesis that RBAC is the cause and solution. Thanks --O---- Stephen Stanford Jones The Citadel, Department of Chemistry, Byrd 404 stationary: sjones3ATcitadelDOTedu, 3-5876 mobile: ss_jonesATmacDOTcom ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] recommendations for updating to 151a9
Hi Tim, On 22.01.2014 22:05, Tim Mooney wrote: - this is a desktop workstation, so I've installed quite a few media-related packages from sfe, and a couple from sfe-encumbered. After I set sfe and sfe-encumbered as non-sticky, the pkg update -nv had no conflicts, but I'm uncertain what that means for the packages I've installed from sfe or sfe-encumbered. - should I just remove all of them before I do an update? - will the fact that sfe and sfe-encumbered are now non-sticky mean that the updates that come from /dev will leave sfe packages on the system, but in a broken state? Or, will the update automatically remove stuff from sfe/sfe-encumbered if their dependencies are no longer met? Because I am responsible for both, JDS and SFE, I can say that it should not be problem to keep sfe and sfe-encumbered as non-sticky. The update will replace older SFE packages with newer JDS (it is system/library/orc which was added to JDS in a9). You can safely update. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Upgrade Conflicts with 151a9
Hi, On 23.01.2014 09:13, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: I know that (you had said that to me few times). What I wanted to stress is: so why do you ask again and again? :-) a) lack of any instructions, docs and plan explanation, etc for both /dev and /hispter releases Lack of time, no document writers? b) I had a look into dictionary: hipster is a person who follows the latest trends and fashions. - So I would expect that /hipster is moving faster than /dev. In some ways yes, probably. Not in all. c) I would expect that changes made in /hipster are implemented to /dev (or it could be that I have wrong impression? see a) Look at /hipster as Ubuntu and /dev as Debian. Sometimes Ubuntu move faster, sometimes Debian. They can take inspirations from each other. In reality, I am ready to claim, that the most part of JDS is the most up-to-date in OI. Even in comparison to Solaris. The rest will be fixed with a10, I hope :-) Again, I do not care about /hipster and I hope that /dev will not take JDS bits from it, because it is much much much easier to maintain JDS in specs than in userland. d) I am willing to help with testing, but with no idea what would be next step, it is really hard. I understand it is not easy to start. But to be fair, several people asked me how they can help. In case of /hipster I answer - go and look at userland and help there. I cannot do more for you. Sorry. Regards. Best regards, Milan Regards Predrag P.S. I am running /hipster and have zone running /dev. Now I have paradox: zone was updated to 1.9 while my global zone is still 1.8.1 It is only number, nothing more :-) Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OI a9 upgrade and SFE
Hi, if you are using SFE on top of OI and you have system/library/orc installed from SFE (e.g. you are using ffmpeg or mplayer), then either set sfe repo as non-sticky or uninstall system/library/orc from SFE before upgrade. system/library/orc is part of OI distribution now. After update to a9, ffmpeg and mplayer can consume system/library/orc from OI without issue. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Upgrade Conflicts with 151a9
Hi, On st, 2014-01-22 at 08:23 +0100, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: On 01/22/14 07:20 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 01/22/2014 07:15, Ray Butler wrote: Hello Experts, Attemping to upgrade my home server to 151a9 today and I'm getting several conflicts which apparently are due to my using the legacy repo. Any way to get around this other than a reinstall? Thanks in advance. 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/bin/apu-1-config target=../apr-util/1.3/bin/apu-1-config': pkg:// openindiana.org/library/apr-util-13@1.5.3,5.11-0.151.1.9:20140117T202444Z 1 package delivers 'link path=usr/bin/apu-1-config target=../apr-util/bin/apu-1-config': pkg:// openindiana.org/library/apr-util@1.5.2,5.11-0.151.1.8.1:20130802T181015Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. Hello. Are you going to update /hipster to dev-a9 ? I think it is not supposed to work out of the box and reverting to latest /dev BE and updating it is the most straightforward way (151.8.1 packages deliver have a lot of libraries of different versions (newer or older than in /dev-a9), some packages were redesigned, some were marked obsolete. Otherwise, you can try to create new BE, uninstall conflicting packages in new BE and try updating... Don't be surprised when it will not work. I can understand confusing feelings (if any): now '/hipster' is version below '/dev' - I would expect '/hipster' to move first, then to update '/dev'. /hipster and /dev are different distros, different build systems and environment. Regards. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Use JDS (from jds.openindiana.org) on top of /hipster installation
Hi, the first step is to have openindiana.org set as non-sticky. But I do not believe it is safe to use OI JDS on top of hipster because hipster contains own set of libs, different from OIdev. But you can try. Best regards, Milan On 08.01.2014 11:51, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: Hi all, I spent some time searching for instructions how to use newer (is it true?) JDS from jds.openindiana.org publisher (http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1/) on top of my OI /hipster installation: $ pkg publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS P LOCATION openindiana.org origin online F http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/ sfe-encumbered origin online F http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered/ sfe(non-sticky) origin online F http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/ sfe-solarix origin online F http://solarix:15100/ jds.openindiana.org (non-sticky) origin online F http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1/ (I have also tried with removed 'non-sticky' switch for jds.openindiana.org, but luck). Would this be proper way (without '-n' switch, of course)? $ pfexec pkg install -vn pkg://jds.openindiana.org/consolidation/gnome/gnome-incorporation Packages to update: 1 Estimated space available: 117.19 GB Estimated space to be consumed: 497.23 MB Create boot environment:No Create backup boot environment: Yes Rebuild boot archive:No Changed packages: openindiana.org - jds.openindiana.org consolidation/gnome/gnome-incorporation 0.5.11-0.151.1.8:20140103T145358Z - 0.5.11-0.151.1.8:20140106T195105Z Or, can someone point to documentation (which I have missed)? Regards. -- Predrag Zečević, Technical Support Analyst, 2e Systems GmbH Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894 Mobile:+49 174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com Headquarter: 2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87, 65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303 Managing director:Phil Douglas http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly! [***]===--- Involvement with people is always a very delicate thing -- it requires real maturity to become involved and not get all messed up. -- Bernard Cooke ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] worspace switcher preferences
Hi, you should add OI JDS repo on top of a8 then. I am sorry but that is the only way how to publish fix for now. Best regards, Milan On út, 2014-01-07 at 10:36 +0100, Marc Lobelle wrote: Hi I have the problem on oi-151a8 (latest distro of Openindiana). Earlier distributions had not the problem, and I still have machines running older distros. My problem is that I do not know which files I should copy from an older distribution to fix the problem (I hope also that the people who prepare the openindiana distributions will fix this in the next ones). Best regards Marc On 6/01/14 09:17, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: HI, doesn't work on latest /hipster too: $ uname -rosv SunOS 5.11 illumos-9b5f588 Solaris Regards. On 01/ 4/14 04:52 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, On út, 2013-12-31 at 18:35 +0100, Marc Lobelle wrote: Hi all, In the bottom right corner of openindiana, solaris etc, sits the workspace switcher widget. By default it shows 4 workspaces in one row. Right clicking in it pops a menu including the preferences .Clicking on prefs pops up a window allowing to set the number of worspaces, their names and the number of rows in the widget. Unfortunately, in the last version of openindiana, the bottom part of the prefs window has disappeared: one can still select the number of rows, but not the number of workspaces nor their names. What files should be picked from an old version of openindiana or solaris to restopre the complete functionality of the workspace switcher ? Do you mean hipster or OI-dev? Thanks Marc Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] worspace switcher preferences
Hi, OK, somebody has to fix hipster JDS then. On OI-dev with the latest JDS build from http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/ I do not have this issue. Best regards, Milan On po, 2014-01-06 at 09:17 +0100, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems Administrator] wrote: HI, doesn't work on latest /hipster too: $ uname -rosv SunOS 5.11 illumos-9b5f588 Solaris Regards. On 01/ 4/14 04:52 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, On út, 2013-12-31 at 18:35 +0100, Marc Lobelle wrote: Hi all, In the bottom right corner of openindiana, solaris etc, sits the workspace switcher widget. By default it shows 4 workspaces in one row. Right clicking in it pops a menu including the preferences .Clicking on prefs pops up a window allowing to set the number of worspaces, their names and the number of rows in the widget. Unfortunately, in the last version of openindiana, the bottom part of the prefs window has disappeared: one can still select the number of rows, but not the number of workspaces nor their names. What files should be picked from an old version of openindiana or solaris to restopre the complete functionality of the workspace switcher ? Do you mean hipster or OI-dev? Thanks Marc Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] worspace switcher preferences
Hi, On út, 2013-12-31 at 18:35 +0100, Marc Lobelle wrote: Hi all, In the bottom right corner of openindiana, solaris etc, sits the workspace switcher widget. By default it shows 4 workspaces in one row. Right clicking in it pops a menu including the preferences .Clicking on prefs pops up a window allowing to set the number of worspaces, their names and the number of rows in the widget. Unfortunately, in the last version of openindiana, the bottom part of the prefs window has disappeared: one can still select the number of rows, but not the number of workspaces nor their names. What files should be picked from an old version of openindiana or solaris to restopre the complete functionality of the workspace switcher ? Do you mean hipster or OI-dev? Thanks Marc Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing OI 151 ssh with OpenSSH 5.9?
Hi, finally. Good work from Solaris security team. Same as ksh93, SSH does not belong to ON gate because of it's external maintenance and own build system. Hopefully one day Illumos gate admins will accept it. Best regards, Milan On pá, 2013-12-20 at 17:24 -0600, Jerry Kemp wrote: Stirring up an old discussion here. Not directly related to OpenIndiana, but got (2) emails from the Solaris userland mailing list today related to SSH. One line item in particular states: 15769261 SUNBT7135649 Deliver OpenSSH 6.0P1 in the userland gate (OpenSSH migration phase 2) content of emails below. Jerry On 01/17/12 12:06 PM, James Carlson wrote: Gregory Youngblood wrote: I was looking into swapping out the ssh that comes with oi151a with openssh 5.9. I already looked in SFE and didn't see openssh, unless I missed it. I pulled the source and it seems to compile OK, though without tcp wrappers, PAM, etc. The first pass was more to see what would happen before spending any real time on it. Before going further, I was wondering if anyone else has done this and whether they have any tips, instructions, or insights. Why would you want to do that ... ? It might help in getting useful responses if you described what you were hoping to accomplish by replacing that component. For what it's worth, the ssh that comes with OpenIndiana is well integrated with the existing OS features and performs decently. You may end up replicating the hard work the Sun ssh team did getting it integrated. = Project:solaris-userland Repository: gate Revision: 1612 Author: userland Date: 2013-12-20 20:17:34 UTC Link: Log Message: PSARC 2012/335 OpenSSH migration PSARC 2013/115 Shared configuration for SunSSH OpenSSH 15769261 SUNBT7135649 Deliver OpenSSH 6.0P1 in the userland gate (OpenSSH migration phase 2) 16306216 problem in UTILITY/OPENSSH Revisions: -- 1612 Added Paths: components/openssh/Makefile components/openssh/openssh.license components/openssh/openssh.p5m components/openssh/patches/001-skip_config_check.patch components/openssh/patches/002-pam_support.patch components/openssh/patches/003-last_login.patch components/openssh/patches/004-broken_bsm_api.patch components/openssh/patches/005-openssh_krb5_build_fix.patch components/openssh/patches/006-umac_align_fix.patch components/openssh/patches/007-manpages.patch components/openssh/patches/008-deprecate_sunssh_opt.patch components/openssh/patches/009-CVE-2010-5107.patch = [solaris-userland~gate:1613] 15769261 SUNBT7135649 Deliver OpenSSH 6.0P1 in the userland gate (OpenSSH Project:solaris-userland Repository: gate Revision: 1613 Author: userland Date: 2013-12-20 22:26:45 UTC Link: Log Message: 15769261 SUNBT7135649 Deliver OpenSSH 6.0P1 in the userland gate (OpenSSH migration phase 2) (add resolve.deps) Revisions: -- 1613 Added Paths: components/openssh/resolve.deps ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ffmpeg on hipster
Hi, On pá, 2013-11-29 at 19:35 +0100, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 29/11/2013 16:48, Paolo Marcheschi wrote: Hi I have troubles in running ffmpeg on latest hipster: ffmpeg ld.so.1: ffmpeg: fatal: libx264.so.136: open failed: No such file or directory ld.so.1: ffmpeg: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libavcodec.so.55: symbol x264_encoder_close: referenced symbol not found ld.so.1: ffmpeg: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/bin/ffmpeg: symbol avcodec_register_all: referenced symbol not found but: bash-4.2$ find /usr/lib/ -name libx264* /usr/lib/libx264.so.138 /usr/lib/libx264.so /usr/lib/amd64/libx264.so /usr/lib/amd64/libx264.so.138 if I make a link: ln -s /usr/lib/libx264.so.138 /usr/lib/libx264.so.136 ld.so.1: ffmpeg: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libavcodec.so.55: symbol x264_encoder_open_136: referenced symbol not found ld.so.1: ffmpeg: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/bin/ffmpeg: symbol avcodec_register_all: referenced symbol not found Killed for the publishers I have: bash-4.2$ pkg publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI sfe (non-sticky) origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/ sfe-encumbered (non-sticky) origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered/ openindiana.org origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/ oi-experimental (non-sticky) origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/experimental/ jds.openindiana.org (non-sticky) origin online http://opensolaris.cz:1/ ms.omniti.com(non-sticky) origin online http://pkg.omniti.com/omniti-ms/ bash-4.2$ uname -a SunOS openindiana 5.11 illumos-a0b6056 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Is there a simple way to solve it ? Yes, I had the same problem with my older setup. OI-SFE and OI-SFE-encumbered deliver the same package, so you have installed the older one from SFE, which will not work anymore. You have to set OI-SFE to non-sticky and OI-SFE-encumbered to sticky, and then update again vi the versions tab (lower right tab). That will overwrite all older packages (there are more) with the newer versions from OI-SFE-enc. The duplicate packages from OI-SFE should be obsoleted, they really confuse existing setups. if I will obsolete the package then nothing will change. You have to force install from the repo with newer package. Sorry. I do not kno any proper way how to move IPS package from one repo to another. Anyway, the problem with ffmpeg should be fixed in SFE-encumbered now. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Add Gnome to server install
Hi, On 22.11.2013 08:02, Rainer Heilke wrote: Greetings. After spending most of the day trying to get the OI 151a8 (LiveCD Desktop) install to boot up with fixed IP addresses, I finally gave up. The wiki is very outdated, and self-contradictory. So I googled, and still nothing. And network-admin doesn't run without NWAM enabled. (This system is a small home running DNS, Mediatomb, and storage shares.and with NWAM, I have to log in to fire up the network interfaces.) But it also acts occasionally as one of my desktops. So, since a fresh install of 151a8 Desktop cannot be made into a server, I installed the server version. if you are using static IP then what is problem to disable nwam, use network:physical and configure IP without automagic? The server version, however, is text only (of course). No Gnome. So, how can I add it? Note that DNS seems a bit borked. I can 'ping 91.194.74.133 I can 'dig pkg.openindiana.org' but I cannot 'ping pkg.openindiana.org' getting an unknown host error. (??) So 'pkg refresh --full' always fails. I suspect this will be the last time I install fresh, rather than doing an upgrade. :-( Your nsswitch config is missing dns for hosts and ipnods. Rainer Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Issue setting time/date in OI 151a8
Hi, known issues with nobody finding time to investigate the root cause. All admin apps are broken in the same way. Best regards, Milan On 21.11.2013 21:20, Dylan Distasio wrote: I had been running OI 151a7 until recently and was able to set the time/date from the GUI option. I just did a fresh install of OI 151a8 and am no longer able to do so. When I launch the option under a8, and validate as root, the time/date popup remains greyed out and the hourglass stays indefinitely when the app is in focus. Has anyone seen this issue with 151a8, and/or can someone suggest some additional troubleshooting to get this working again. I am running it on a Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 mobo. Thanks. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI 151a8 Error : System -- Administration -- User and Groups
Hi, On ne, 2013-11-10 at 08:52 +0100, Jean-Pierre André wrote: Handojo wrote: Hi All, I am encountering a frozen display on System -- Administration -- User and Groups After I entered the required root password, the User and Groups Window is still frozen, as if it doesn't know that the popup window requesting password has returned. This make it unusable. Should I : re-burn the OI151a8 iso, and reinstall again ? No : the bug is present in all recent versions, up to the latest hipster. Same for time and date and other administration tools. I just hope it is related to bug 4043 whose root cause is supposed to be known (https://www.illumos.org/issues/4043) no, it is not related to that bug. Because I use OI with fixed this for 1 month already. I did not find the root cause for admin tools problem yet, mainly because I did not pay attention to it too much. But I see users are missing it, I will look at it. Anyway, many regressions were fixed in the last JDS build (on http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/) but I am not the one who has power to include it to OI or hipster releases. In the meantime, use groupadd and useradd or downgrade to an older version. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Mplayer problem
Hi Russell, you are using hipster, aren't you? Well, I have no good solution for you here because hipster includes own lzo package which is in collision with SFE lzo package. And mplayer depends on SFE lzo. And mplayer2 is unbuildable for now, so I cannot fix mplayer2 to the next OI release. The only option on hipster is then gnome/media/gnome-media-extras for totem. SFE packages are built on OI. Probably somebody from hipster should take care of own SFE hipster builds. Best regards, Milan On pá, 2013-10-11 at 20:14 +0100, russell wrote: Hi Milan, # pkg info mplayer pkg: info: no packages matching the following patterns you specified are installed on the system. Try specifying -r to query remotely: mplayer # more /etc/release OpenIndiana Development oi_151.1.8 X86 (powered by illumos) Copyright 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 19 February 2013 # pkg install mplayer Creating Plan - pkg install: No matching version of media/mplayer can be installed: Reject: pkg://sfe-encumbered/media/mplayer@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120818T211441Z Reason: All versions matching 'require' dependency pkg:/library/lzo@2.6,5.11-0.151.1 are rejected Reject: pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6,5.11-0.151.1:20111025T174618Z pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181521Z Reason: Higher ranked publisher openindiana.org was selected Reject: pkg://sfe-encumbered/media/mplayer@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.6:20120930T223145Z pkg://sfe-encumbered/media/mplayer@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.8:20130930T195946Z pkg://sfe-encumbered/media/mplayer@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.8:20130930T201848Z Reason: All versions matching 'require' dependency pkg:/library/lzo@2.6,5.11-0.151.1.5 are rejected Reject: pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181521Z Reason: Higher ranked publisher openindiana.org was selected # pkg uninstall mplayer Creating Plan pkg uninstall: 'mplayer' matches no installed packages ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Hipster 151.1.8 - Mplayer
Hi, On čt, 2013-10-10 at 18:58 +0100, russell wrote: Hi, Since Hipster was released I have now to streams of OpenIndiana on my computer, the Hipster and normal releases but I have noticed that the last two releases of Hipster now cause Mplayer to crash. So I upgraded from OpenIndiana 151.1.6 to OpenIndiana 151.1.8 and found that this release also experienced the same problem. I did try upgrade from OI_151.1.7 to OI_151.1.8 but found the problems, after deleting the 151.1.8 boot environment I tried from 0I_151.1.6 and it worked perfectly. could you send output of pkg info mplayer ? Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] pulseaudio
Hi, On st, 2013-10-09 at 14:57 +0200, Nikola M. wrote: On 09/25/13 12:09 PM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, it is part of SFE spec files, very same as integrated in S11.1, missing is only SunRay support I think. And that is irrelevant these days. Uh, don't think for a second SunRay is irrelevant. And support for it should not be included. It is in use and will be in use for a long time I think. I will install SRSS for first time these days, to learn how to set it up. I actually plan on using it more, since prices for used ones are low now and it is very usable for VDI. how relevant is obsolete closed source technology? Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] pulseaudio
Hi, On st, 2013-10-09 at 17:11 -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Milan Jurik wrote: how relevant is obsolete closed source technology? how relevant is obsolete closed mind ideology? the company responsible for development of all key components stopped to sell it to new customers. See what happens when you put adjectives together with minimal facts? relevant has different meaning depending on whether one uses them; and to everyone else, depending on how many people are still using them. Yes, there are few instalations of OI probably. How important for them pulseaudio is? closed source isn't entirely accurate; there are open source implementations of the SunRay Appliance Link Protocol (ALP): http://sourceforge.net/p/softray/wiki/Home/ Without development for more than 3 years. http://sourceforge.net/p/lens/home/Home/ Without development for more than 3 years. and I've heard about some others too, but have other things to do than prove the point right now. Find some different technology, which has more documentation, more attention and has future. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi-151a8: sound-juicer doesn't find CD?
Hi, On čt, 2013-10-03 at 00:25 -0700, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: On 10/02/13 09:56, ken mays wrote: Milan Jurik has provided updates to GNOME over at pkg.openindiana.cz/oi-jds that doesn't seem to exist.. oi-jds is name of hg repo :-) The updates will be in oi_151a9 and updated to the main repo. .. but I found (and installed) what I think you were referring to at http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/ for publisher jds.openindiana.org, packaged on September 16th, 2013 /osol/ is relict of some old times... Years ago there were SFE packages for OpenSolaris... Officially it is on http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1/ Unfortunately, sound-juicer behaves the same way with those packages - it doesn't auto-launch when a disk is inserted, and if launched manually, it doesn't find the optical drive. Yes, it is not fixed in that JDS build. Guess I'll have to start digging further.. You can track it progress here: https://www.illumos.org/issues/4059 But I am sorry, we have last nice days in my country before winter, so I have different preferences. I fixed in the last JDS dev build only the critical issues, not all regressions from JDS 2010. Volunteers welcomed, otherwise you have to wait till bad weather :-) Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] pulseaudio
Hi, it is part of SFE spec files, very same as integrated in S11.1, missing is only SunRay support I think. And that is irrelevant these days. Best regards, Milan On 25.09.2013 09:13, real-men-dont-cl...@gmx.net wrote: Hello everybody, did anybody try to compile pulseaudio for OI, so far? It should be possible as it is in Oracle Solais 11.1 now. Oracle supplied the information about the toolchain used to build the desktop stuff, but I didn't find the time to look deeper into that. So, before reinventing the wheel, perhaps somebody did it already? thx Carsten ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi-151a8 JDS menus and launcher gone
Hi, On so, 2013-09-14 at 15:29 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 14/09/2013 00:44, Colin Ellis wrote: If you create a new user and log in as the new user, does that user also have the problem? Exactly the same: Simple new user in group users, no roles, no menus... On Sep 13, 2013 5:39 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) udo.grabow...@kit.edu wrote: Hi Milan, I know why you cannot reproduce the problem: You probably have role Administrator. Checked that, works with admin role, but not without. The usual user in a company does not have role admin in the common world, so this should not be made mandatory to get the menus back. this info sent me on the rigth path. One new JDS feature is not correctly implemented on OI yet, I will disable it for now. You can try it in testing BE with http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1 Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Anywhere to get pkg for sshfs/fuse
Hi, On čt, 2013-09-12 at 17:51 -0500, Tim Mooney wrote: In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Anywhere to get pkg for sshfs/fuse,...: There is the Spec files Extras repository , with info in the wiki: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Spec+Files+Extra+Repository Thanks for pointing this out. Since I'm relatively new to OpenIndiana, I hadn't stumbled on that yet. I've now installed some packages from the sfe repository, but AFAICT neither sfe nor sfe-encumbered have one package that I dearly want: gst-plugins-ugly. Having these plugins would allow any application that uses gstreamer to play additional formats, including MP3s. Since there's so many other good multimedia applications in sfe-encumbered, is gst-plugins-ugly just an oversight? not the oversight but lack of time. Give me few weeks :-) As an aside, I had actually built my open copies of all the prereqs and gst-plugins-ugly and packaged them with RPM and installed them under /usr/local, but the problem is that I built everything 64 bit. It looks like OI ships 32 bit and 64 bit versions of most libraries and commands, but apparently rhythmbox and totem are only shipped as 32 bit applications. Yes, the most of apps are 32 bit. There is no big benefit in making them 64bit yet. Tim Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi-151a8 JDS menus and launcher gone
Hi, On út, 2013-09-10 at 23:29 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: Milan, how did you exactly upgrade ? From a stock a7, one of the hipster builds, with your JDS on top or without ? I tried from a7 and hipster 3 weeks ago, and both upgrades don't have the application menu. stock a7 to stock a8. I have many different BEs. Could you look at pkg list and verify you have all packages on a8 version? Best regards, Milan On 07/09/2013 12:41, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, Udo Grabowski (IMK) píše v so 07. 09. 2013 v 12:03 +0200: On 06/09/2013 22:36, Milan Jurik wrote: I did not see it on my system and I . But if you know what to do, few fixes in JDS I made are available on http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1 Is it this fix why you're not seeing this problem ? http://hg.opensolaris.cz/oi-jds/rev/0dc3aa066555 Note that we are using stock a8, not a8 with your JDS on top. I have the same GConf problem on stock a8. That should be fixed on fresh JDS build. What I do not see on stock a8 is problem with missing menu and launchers. Even on stock a8. On st, 2013-09-04 at 11:23 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: After update to the newest oi-151a8, all entries in the application menu and all custom launchers in the gnome-panel are gone. Only with user root, these can be seen, even another root user with id,gid 0,0 does not see the entries. In .xsession-errors, I see: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Unable to autolaunch when setuid) ... --ms020508070006050108070209-- ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi-151a8 JDS menus and launcher gone
Hi, Udo Grabowski (IMK) píše v so 07. 09. 2013 v 12:03 +0200: On 06/09/2013 22:36, Milan Jurik wrote: I did not see it on my system and I . But if you know what to do, few fixes in JDS I made are available on http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1 Is it this fix why you're not seeing this problem ? http://hg.opensolaris.cz/oi-jds/rev/0dc3aa066555 Note that we are using stock a8, not a8 with your JDS on top. I have the same GConf problem on stock a8. That should be fixed on fresh JDS build. What I do not see on stock a8 is problem with missing menu and launchers. Even on stock a8. FYI, builds on opensolaris.cz are incomplete, they are in aplha stage so use them only in separate BE for testing. Best regards, Milan On st, 2013-09-04 at 11:23 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: After update to the newest oi-151a8, all entries in the application menu and all custom launchers in the gnome-panel are gone. Only with user root, these can be seen, even another root user with id,gid 0,0 does not see the entries. In .xsession-errors, I see: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Unable to autolaunch when setuid) ... --ms010701000409090305070707-- ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi-151a8 JDS menus and launcher gone
Hi, Bill Sommerfeld píše v pá 06. 09. 2013 v 16:30 -0700: On 09/06/13 13:36, Milan Jurik wrote: I did not see it on my system and I . But if you know what to do, few fixes in JDS I made are available on http://pkg.opensolaris.cz:1 what did you change in the source? I don't see anything new at http://hg.opensolaris.cz/oi-jds/ yet. nothing changed in the source, small fix was needed in my build environment for GConf issue which I missed during final build of bits for a8 release. I started seeing an underpopulated JDS menu and missing launchers and panel widgets with the real oi_151a8; the dev-test version was fine. In my copious spare time, I've started attempting to dtrace and truss my way into figuring out what's different between the working and the failing builds but haven't made much headway yet. I have no idea what went wrong with menu yet. I cannot reproduce it on my systems :-( Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New Wiki page for adding a Windows GRUB entry
Hi, On po, 2013-09-02 at 12:59 -0500, Gary Mills wrote: On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Jean-Pierre wrote: Gary Mills wrote: It sounds as if the OI installer needs to be fixed. Can you file a bug report on this problem, if it hasn't already been done? Done as bug #4096 (who is going to get the next power of 2 ?) I remember that I discussed it with responsible engineers years ago, they had some reason for this. But I forgot it :-( I see that you submitted your bug report under: https://www.illumos.org/projects/illumos-gate/issues That's for illumos bugs only. Yours should be under: https://www.illumos.org/projects/openindiana/issues since it's an OI bug. I assume that the bug is in the slim_source consolidation. It should be an easy fix for anyone who knows Python. I couldn't find a way to move it. Perhaps you can delete it and recreate it instead. Moved to OI distro. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Unmount DVD from GUI fails with oi_151a8
Hi Carsten, I am not aware of any GUI workaround, only command line commands :-( Milan On 22.08.2013 10:27, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Hi Milan, because this problem exist also for USB-storage can you publish the fix or a workarround? THX Am 21.08.13 schrieb Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz: Hi, On 20.08.2013 20:03, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, On po, 2013-08-19 at 17:36 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 19/08/2013 17:12, Gary Mills wrote: When I insert a DVD in the drive on an oi_151a8 computer, a corresponding icon appears on the desktop. However, when I select the `Unmount' option from the icon menu, I get a dialogue box: Unable to unmount ... umount: permission denied I don't know if this worked under oi_151a7. When I press the eject button on the DVD drive, it does eject the DVD and the icon does disappear. Everything involving libdbus/Orbit permissions on Gnome is totally f**ed up due to a security change in libdbus. Don't know how to get out of this mess, which also involves the package manager and other stuff that needs root or role permissions. Use 'eject' from the command line. yes, I am looking at this issues :-( fix found, I am testing it on my personal systems. I will publish dev-test JDS repo on the beginning of September with several fixes. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Unmount DVD from GUI fails with oi_151a8
Hi, On po, 2013-08-19 at 17:36 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 19/08/2013 17:12, Gary Mills wrote: When I insert a DVD in the drive on an oi_151a8 computer, a corresponding icon appears on the desktop. However, when I select the `Unmount' option from the icon menu, I get a dialogue box: Unable to unmount ... umount: permission denied I don't know if this worked under oi_151a7. When I press the eject button on the DVD drive, it does eject the DVD and the icon does disappear. Everything involving libdbus/Orbit permissions on Gnome is totally f**ed up due to a security change in libdbus. Don't know how to get out of this mess, which also involves the package manager and other stuff that needs root or role permissions. Use 'eject' from the command line. yes, I am looking at this issues :-( Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Unmount DVD from GUI fails with oi_151a8
Hi, On 20.08.2013 20:03, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, On po, 2013-08-19 at 17:36 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 19/08/2013 17:12, Gary Mills wrote: When I insert a DVD in the drive on an oi_151a8 computer, a corresponding icon appears on the desktop. However, when I select the `Unmount' option from the icon menu, I get a dialogue box: Unable to unmount ... umount: permission denied I don't know if this worked under oi_151a7. When I press the eject button on the DVD drive, it does eject the DVD and the icon does disappear. Everything involving libdbus/Orbit permissions on Gnome is totally f**ed up due to a security change in libdbus. Don't know how to get out of this mess, which also involves the package manager and other stuff that needs root or role permissions. Use 'eject' from the command line. yes, I am looking at this issues :-( fix found, I am testing it on my personal systems. I will publish dev-test JDS repo on the beginning of September with several fixes. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi_151a8: What happened to slocate?
Hi, On po, 2013-08-19 at 19:09 -0500, Russ Price wrote: On 08/19/2013 04:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: I don't know how closely OI followed, but in the upstream (midstream?) sources from Oracle, JDS obsoleted slocate because the upstream died, and mlocate was delivered in Userland to replace it. mlocate had the benefit of both a still active upstream and of not needing to abuse ksh93's private libast.so the way slocate had. It's also the choice Red Hat/Fedora and several other distros made to replace slocate when it died. http://carolina.mff.cuni.cz/~trmac/blog/mlocate/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=172822 https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/oracle/userland-gate/file/tip/components/mlocate I guess I'll have to grab the source and compile my own, since there isn't an mlocate package in oi_151a8. Yes, slocate was obsoleted for very same reason as in Oracle JDS. I did not include mlocate, everybody is free to contribute it to Userland for the next release. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI 151a8: No SFTP in Nautilus?
Hi, interesting, I see the same issue on a8 but not on a7+JDS. I will look at it, log the bug, please. Best regards, Milan On 13.08.2013 03:20, Valrhona wrote: Thanks to everyone who worked to make OI 151a8 a great success! I upgraded, and now my GNOME bookmarks for sites I have SSH access to no longer work. I tried the Places - Connect to Server, and now there is no option for SFTP. Is this intentional, or is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks! Peter ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oi_151a8 is out
On 13.08.2013 10:48, Nikola M. wrote: On 08/12/13 08:25 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Wot, no-one's mentioned this yet? http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_151a_prestable8+Release+Notes Nice, that should be mentioned on openindiana-announce at least. You are welcome... First impression after updating from a7 are Desktop icons somehow got sorted in the left , no GNOME Trash applet working, (adding it works but is not visible/working in a8 , it is seen as multiple Trash applets later in Hipster) Bug number? Pidgin (internet messenger) is crashing in 151a8 /dev, with dumping core: https://mega.co.nz/#!KkBDxDST!R8JNGhJjmyx_mR7HJKJTDh03I5dNLpkZE7dGaVNsrFY https://mega.co.nz/#%21KkBDxDST%21R8JNGhJjmyx_mR7HJKJTDh03I5dNLpkZE7dGaVNsrFY Bug number? Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Status of compilers in use for OI
Hi, On pá, 2013-07-12 at 19:14 +0200, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2013-07-12 18:49, Bryan N Iotti wrote: It is mentioned that we are using Sun Studio 12.1 when compiling /dev and /stable. Are we stuck there and can't use 12.3 for some particular reason, like licensing, or is it for compatibility? I believe, there were attempts to build with SS 12.3 when it came out, and it lead to erroneous code, allegedly the compiler's fault. Since there was no way to make Oracle fix the compiler, those tries were abandoned and illumos stuck with what was known to just work. it is not the compiler issue but the limit of as we have in Illumos available. 12.3 generates asm which we are unable to process. Best regards, Milan Possibly, later releases of SS12.3 patches (if publicly available) fixed the problem - after all, Oracle would be using it to compile their Solaris, and likely hit similar problems; I am not aware of anything trying that with illumos. HTH, //Jim ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] gnome-terminal fails
Hi, I can reproduce it on my JDS build on top of OI. I hope to find some time to look at its code for fix. Log the bug, please. Best regards, Milan On st, 2013-07-10 at 11:53 +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: Hi, OI_151a8 hipster: open a simple gnome-terminal, grab the upper border, and make window smaller down to a few lines and larger. After that, you can't type anymore into that window, and 20 sec later ALL gnome-terminals suddenly vanish from your desktop . Starting from an xterm, IO can dbx it and see a segmentation fault: (gnome-terminal:18295): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 5750: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed Segmentation fault and then it also kills your gnome-settings-daemon ug1(~) dbx /usr/bin/gnome-terminal For information about new features see `help changes' To remove this message, put `dbxenv suppress_startup_message 7.7' in your .dbxrc Reading gnome-terminal Reading ld.so.1 Reading libc.so.1 Reading libgobject-2.0.so.0.2800.6 Reading libglib-2.0.so.0.2800.6 (dbx) run Running: gnome-terminal (process id 18680) Reading libgthread-2.0.so.0.2800.6 Reading libpthread.so.1 Reading libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2000.1 Reading libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2000.1 Reading libcairo.so.2.11000.2 Reading libXrender.so.1 Reading libX11.so.4 Reading libXext.so.0 Reading libgio-2.0.so.0.2800.6 Reading libresolv.so.2 Reading libnsl.so.1 Reading libsocket.so.1 Reading xlcUTF8Load.so.2 Reading libXau.so.6 Reading libXrandr.so.2 Reading libXfixes.so.1 Reading libXcomposite.so.1 Reading libXdamage.so.1 Reading libXi.so.5 Reading libpango-1.0.so.0.2800.3 Reading libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2800.6 Reading libnimbus.so Reading libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2000.1 Reading libXcursor.so.1 Reading libcanberra-gtk-module.so Reading libatk-1.0.so.0.3009.1 Reading libICE.so.6 Reading libSM.so.6 Reading libdbus-glib-1.so.2.1.0 Reading libdbus-1.so.3.4.3 Reading librt.so.1 Reading libgconf-2.so.4.1.5 Reading libORBit-2.so.0.1.0 Reading libvte.so.9.2600.2 Reading UTF-8%8859-15.so Reading UTF-8%UTF-8.so Reading libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.2800.3 Reading libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.2800.3 Reading libfontconfig.so.1 Reading libfreetype.so.6 Reading libm.so.2 Reading libexpat.so.1.6.0 Reading pango-basic-fc.so Reading libgioremote-volume-monitor.so Reading libgsettingsgconfbackend.so Reading libgvfsdbus.so Reading libgvfscommon.so.0.0.0 Reading libgiogconf.so Reading libmlib.so.2 Reading libmlib_sse2.so.2 Reading im-xim.so Reading xiiimp.so.2 Reading libiiimcf.so.3.0.0 Reading libiiimp.so.1.0.0 Reading ximcp.so.2 Reading libpixman-1.so.0 Reading xomGeneric.so.2 (gnome-terminal:18680): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 5750: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed t@1 (l@1) signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address) in from_mozilla_widget at 0xfdfd7e71 0xfdfd7e71: from_mozilla_widget+0x003d: cmpb %al,(%ecx) (dbx) where current thread: t@1 =[1] from_mozilla_widget(0x82140a0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x0), at 0xfdfd7e71 [2] draw_slider(0x824ce58, 0x80e09f8, 0x0, 0x2, 0x8045100, 0x82140a0, 0xfe7d2e0c, 0x193, 0x2a, 0xd, 0x1, 0x1), at 0xfdfdcc7d [3] gtk_paint_slider(0x824ce58, 0x80e09f8, 0x0, 0x2, 0x8045100, 0x82140a0, 0xfe7d2e0c, 0x193, 0x2a, 0xd, 0x1, 0x1), at 0xfe61cbe6 [4] gtk_range_expose(0x82140a0, 0x8244e80), at 0xfe5d52fe [5] _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED(0x810dc40, 0x80452c0, 0x2, 0x823f8a0, 0x80452e8, 0xfe5d4bc8, 0x80451e8, 0xfedd295c), at 0xfe592fc4 [6] g_type_class_meta_marshal(0x810dc40, 0x80452c0, 0x2, 0x823f8a0, 0x80452e8, 0xc8, 0x40008006, 0xfedd25ce), at 0xfedd2996 [7] g_closure_invoke(0x810dc40, 0x80452c0, 0x2, 0x823f8a0, 0x80452e8, 0x82140a0, 0x8045268, 0xfede90e9), at 0xfedd267a [8] signal_emit_unlocked_R(0x810db38, 0x0, 0x82140a0, 0x8045400, 0x823f8a0, 0x14, 0x80453c0, 0x800), at 0xfedea1f5 [9] g_signal_emit_valist(0x82140a0, 0x29, 0x0, 0x80454ac), at 0xfede8bb1 [10] g_signal_emit(0x82140a0, 0x29, 0x0, 0x8244e80, 0x80454cc, 0xfee10e2c, 0x80454e8, 0xfe6beea6), at 0xfede8f25 [11] gtk_widget_event_internal(0x82140a0, 0x8244e80, 0x8045508, 0xfe6bec78), at 0xfe6bf09c [12] gtk_widget_send_expose(0x82140a0, 0x8244e80, 0x8045548, 0xfe511536), at 0xfe6becf9 [13] gtk_container_propagate_expose(0x8140108, 0x82140a0, 0x8244ed0, 0xfe5112e4), at 0xfe511663 [14] gtk_container_expose_child(0x82140a0, 0x80455e8, 0x80455a8, 0xfe4dc872), at 0xfe5112fe [15] gtk_box_forall(0x8140108, 0x1, 0xfe5112d8, 0x80455e8), at 0xfe4dc8a5 [16] gtk_container_forall(0x8140108, 0xfe5112d8, 0x80455e8, 0xfe511322), at 0xfe50f7f4 [17] gtk_container_expose(0x8140108, 0x8244ed0), at 0xfe51136c [18] _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED(0x810dc40, 0x80457a0, 0x2, 0x823f828, 0x80457c8, 0xfe511308, 0x80456c8, 0xfedd295c), at 0xfe592fc4 [19] g_type_class_meta_marshal(0x810dc40, 0x80457a0, 0x2, 0x823f828, 0x80457c8, 0xc8, 0x40008005, 0xfedd25ce), at 0xfedd2996
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Looking for capable notebook for OI and other OSes, small size and with real network.
Hi, some laptops with nVidia NVS could be usable. Best regards, Milan On út, 2013-03-26 at 13:42 -0600, Gregory S. Youngblood wrote: If you find a good option I would like to know. The last good laptop I have personally used that worked great with open Indiana was my Lenovo T61p from 2008. I still have it and it works well though it is a bit dated and big. -- Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: I've been looking at possible choices for a small note-book for OI and some sort of Windows in dual boot, possibly even an ultrabook thingie. However, I keep running into disappointments: The biggest one is the apparent scarcity of proper high-capacity GB wired ethernet. Also, if I'd like to run such a thing under some Illumos based OS, I'd have to think very carefully. I sort of liked the Dell XPS 13 Linux Developer's Edition; small, full HD screen, nice kbd, very thin and fairly large SSD disk. But, running it under OI151a7??? I think that might be a bit unlikely to succeed! So, what advice can people give me on this subject? The Dell XPS 13 is the right price range, around €1000. The size is very nice, the screen is VERY good.. So, there's a nice exterior target type, but what if I absolutely require to run OI and have a proper network connector, and PXE capacity? And MUST run OI, with working wired network and graphics accel. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?
Hi, SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side, at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no time to look at it yet. Best regards, Milan On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: Who maintains the SFE package? If somebody is already maintaining it, I don't think I should butt in. (?) I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance process. If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be more inclined to do some package work for OI. I can't really take that on right now, though. At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, though! I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated? I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly. On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, too. Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your own installation updated from sources. Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not terribly difficult even that. If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable from somewhere, and those are possibly a little easier to produce. Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call on me, and I could try to help out. On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated? service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on the sfe repository. --- v2.1.15 2013-02-08 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O and memory than necessary. --- I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly up to date. I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the sources. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?
Hi, On pá, 2013-03-22 at 08:06 +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: So I take it you're the lead on doing SFE for OI?? if you call me in such way as I am the only one publishing to official SFE OI repo. Can you comment on what is the most accurate instruction for how to build OI SFE packages??? Looking at the tree under http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/SFE I see links that are no longer working and several other minor oddities. Also, there's a tantalising reference to more modern methods that will be commented here. I've asked about this before, but noone answered precisely this question: Where is the correct documentation on how to do OI SFE repository packages at home? AND, pehaps a more interesting question: How to get involved as a maintainer of some particular package or set of packages??? Both start on http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ as you discovered already. Try to build your first SVR4 package, then the next step is easy, just create your local publisher with pkgrepo and export PKGBUILD_IPS_SERVER (as URL) for pkgtool and it will publish IPS package to that repo. To be maintainer of some package, you have to prepare your CBE and submit some updated spec for review to SFE mailing list. See the URL above. Best regards, Milan On 2013-03-22 07:09, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side, at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no time to look at it yet. Best regards, Milan On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: Who maintains the SFE package? If somebody is already maintaining it, I don't think I should butt in. (?) I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance process. If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be more inclined to do some package work for OI. I can't really take that on right now, though. At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, though! I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated? I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly. On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, too. Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your own installation updated from sources. Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not terribly difficult even that. If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable from somewhere, and those are possibly a little easier to produce. Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call on me, and I could try to help out. On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated? service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on the sfe repository. --- v2.1.15 2013-02-08 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O and memory than necessary. --- I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly up to date. I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the sources. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?
On pá, 2013-03-22 at 01:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: Great! Do you normally keep dovecot reasonably up to date? SFE has active dovecot maintainer. The problem is build system now, I hope it will be solved soon. Best regards, Milan And, thanks for your contributions to OpenIndiana. On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side, at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no time to look at it yet. Best regards, Milan On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: Who maintains the SFE package? If somebody is already maintaining it, I don't think I should butt in. (?) I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance process. If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be more inclined to do some package work for OI. I can't really take that on right now, though. At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, though! I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated? I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly. On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, too. Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your own installation updated from sources. Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not terribly difficult even that. If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable from somewhere, and those are possibly a little easier to produce. Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call on me, and I could try to help out. On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated? service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on the sfe repository. --- v2.1.15 2013-02-08 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O and memory than necessary. --- I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly up to date. I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the sources. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] about tuntap
SFE is using http://www.whiteboard.ne.jp/~admin2/tuntap/ as the source Milan On 22.02.2013 14:21, Jonathan Adams wrote: sorry to but in, but how does this differ from the tuntap made by Maxim Krasnyansky that's in the SFE? Jon On 21 February 2013 19:24, Gordon Ross gordon.w.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Maurizio Boriani bau...@yahoo.it wrote: Hi all, in openindiana 151a7, the tuntap driver is: http://www.whiteboard.ne.jp/~admin2/tuntap/ or it has its' own? thanks, baux I have a userland style build for tuntap and openvpn here: https://bitbucket.org/gwr/userland-openvpn Works for me. -- Gordon Ross g...@nexenta.com Nexenta Systems, Inc. www.nexenta.com Enterprise class storage for everyone ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana roadmap
Hi, fee sounds nice. But you have to find somebody to whom to pay it. Nobody offers manpower helping Jon to build and to assemble releases. All working on it have full time job (with no plans to change I think). Offer some dedicated junior team members, not money. Best regards, Milan On 19.02.2013 13:41, Weiergräber, Oliver H. wrote: Moreover, providing security fixes has been a defined goal of OpenIndiana right from the beginning. See the FAQ: Q: Will OpenIndiana provide security and bug fixes to their stable releases? A: Yes, absolutely. We view this as one of the key missing features that prevented widescale adoption of OpenSolaris in production environments. Precisely. I think a small fee for security fixes (on the order of, say, $50/y) would appear quite acceptable even to private or academic OI users. Oliver PD Dr. Oliver H. Weiergräber Institute of Complex Systems ICS-6: Structural Biochemistry Tel.: +49 2461 61-2028 Fax: +49 2461 61-9540 From: Bob Friesenhahn [bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:52 AM To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana roadmap On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Jesus Cea wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/01/13 02:43, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Jesus Cea wrote: Is out there an OpenIndiana Roadmap?. In particular, I am VERY interested in a security supported version. How much are you willing to pay for this service? I would be willing to pay $100-200/year per system for simple binary updates and no support calls (other than if simple updates don't work). I see that OmniOS offers commercial support ($1000/year for 2 sockets) but they don't say if that includes security support. The notion of support usually seems to include someone to call to work through difficult technical issues and not just delivery of updated binaries. It is really not all that difficult to offer security support. A couple of people should be able to accomplish it for the whole OS. Bob ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE or OpenCSW? Or both?
Hi Stefan, I have a bit different question - what are you missing in SFE? Best regards, Milan Stefan Müller-Wilken píše v ne 10. 02. 2013 v 09:56 +: Dear all, as the amount of packages for OpenCSW by far exceeds SFE / SFE-encumbered, here's a (hopefully not stupid) question: are there any drawbacks involved in switching over to OpenCSW? Or have both in parallel? My intent is to run OpenIndiana in the tradition of OpenSolaris as an open source Solaris and as close to it as possible - and not as a kind of Linux with Solaris kernel. So, what's your way? Cheers Stefan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE or OpenCSW? Or both?
Hi Stefan, Stefan Müller-Wilken píše v ne 10. 02. 2013 v 13:13 +: Hi Milan, a good and valid question. Although I was coming more via quantity than quality, there are some packages of interest: MongoDB is one example, hylafax another one. None of these 2 are ready as specs for now. I heard some bad info about MongoDB vs. Solaris platform but it should not be big problem to compile it. For hylafax - it builds but it needs some love to make it nice in Solaris environment, e.g. init scripts. If anybody is interested in it then the fastest way is to produce spec and keep it updated. But I am right in my assumption that SFE stays closer to the original than CSW, right? At least that's what I also take from Brogyi's response. And that alone would be a justification for me to rather work on improving SFE than switching over to OpenCSW. Yes, OpenCSW is building own environment, trying to separate itself from system. Sometimes it is good, sometimes it is not. Cheers Stefan Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] For serviio 1.2beta, could, sfe-encumbered - ffmpeg and libffmpeg be updated to version 1.1.1??
Hi, done Milan Hans J. Albertsson píše v so 09. 02. 2013 v 17:24 +0100: A new ffmpeg and rtmpdump appeared today. Thanks a lot! Too bad you used v 1.1 rather than 1.1.1 ( or, better still, 1.1.2 ) which means it won't do the job for serviio 1.2 beta1. It does mean there's a significant improvement for many other uses anyway, so thanks regardless. On 2013-02-05 00:14, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote: Message: 1 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:06:51 +0100 From: Hans J. Albertssonhans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se To:openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss]For serviio 1.2beta, could sfe-encumbered - ffmpeg and libffmpeg be updated to version 1.1.1?? Message-ID:511014db.5070...@branneriet.se Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I guess Milan or Ken Mays might be the people to ask about this?? Current compile and link options (including the librtmp inclusion) are just right, I think. 1.1.1 contains stuff for new video stream types. The latest version of libRTMP must also be used and referenced for the new ffmpeg to work. I think. This is to enable running the next beta, 1.2, of serviio.org, Serviio is possibly the only reasonably complete DLNA server that runs w/o any special preps on OpenIndiana. Installing serviio.org on openindiana is no more complex than expanding a tarball and running a jar. You can put an SMF def in place if you like. Contact me if there's an interest. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Amanda Backup in SFE?
Hi, On pá, 2013-01-25 at 13:46 +, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote: Dear all, I read on illumos.org that there was an Amanda package in spec-files-extra but it needed a new maintainer (see https://www.illumos.org/issues/1302). Does anyone know about its current status? Is there a repo with existing package / metadata files? there is old spec file for Amanda in SFE - http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ I did not touch it for very long time because I have no interest in Amanda these days. You are welcome to look at it, update and fix it. Then I can push binary packages to SFE publisher. Cheers Stefan Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] numpy for python 3.2
Hi, yes, it would be possible, but it requires time which I do not have now :-( Please, open ticket, I will try to look at it later. Best regards, Milan On 17.01.2013 23:09, Kostas Oikonomou wrote: Would it be possible to add numpy to the lib/vendor-packages of the SFE python3.2 package? Kostas ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Anybody using Trusted JDS/Gnome?
Hi, is anybody interested in Trusted JDS in OpenIndiana? It represents set of packages and patches I would prefer to remove from OI JDS in future because of lack of consumers. Is somebody interested in maintaing this part of system? Best regards, Milan P.S.: If you do not know what Trusted JDS is then you do not need it. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Mount NTFS USB under OmniOS
Hi, On st, 2013-01-02 at 13:35 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2013-01-02 08:26, Jean-Pierre wrote: Up to date ntfs-3g and FUSE for OpenIndiana are available, with directions for installing on : http://jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/openindiana-ntfs-3g.html The same fuse kernel module has also been made available on SFE, but ntfs-3g is still an old one there. yes, I am sorry, I spend my spare time on JDS/Gnome for now (nearly completed task). I will look at it later this month if nobody else. I wonder what should the policy be about near-kernel support of foreign filesystems - shouldn't these (and FUSE) go to illumos-gate? For example, the (native) support of pcfs, hsfs and several others is maintained there... This way, all illumos-based distros would have comparable feature sets in terms of this basic FS interoperability support. Or is the main gate's current policy to only maintain the projects with no external upstream (*BSD etc.)? Then the FSes might go into common oi-build/illumos-userland/name-du-jour (BTW, which one - if any - is the active project for non-kernel common illumos software?) It would require to have somebody pushing it to Illumos, with at least 2 reviewers. My current experience is not very good in pushing larger things there, ext2fs did not find any reviewer for a year, WPA enterprise implementation with WiFi improvements and clean ups are also waiting. In case of FUSE I am not even trying because at least one highly respected RTI advocate was strong opponent of this FUSE implementation even during his SUN carreer. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Mount NTFS USB under OmniOS
Hi Gordon, On 02.01.2013 23:38, Gordon Ross wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote: Hi, On st, 2013-01-02 at 13:35 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2013-01-02 08:26, Jean-Pierre wrote: Up to date ntfs-3g and FUSE for OpenIndiana are available, with directions for installing on : http://jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/openindiana-ntfs-3g.html The same fuse kernel module has also been made available on SFE, but ntfs-3g is still an old one there. yes, I am sorry, I spend my spare time on JDS/Gnome for now (nearly completed task). I will look at it later this month if nobody else. I wonder what should the policy be about near-kernel support of foreign filesystems - shouldn't these (and FUSE) go to illumos-gate? For example, the (native) support of pcfs, hsfs and several others is maintained there... This way, all illumos-based distros would have comparable feature sets in terms of this basic FS interoperability support. Or is the main gate's current policy to only maintain the projects with no external upstream (*BSD etc.)? Then the FSes might go into common oi-build/illumos-userland/name-du-jour (BTW, which one - if any - is the active project for non-kernel common illumos software?) It would require to have somebody pushing it to Illumos, with at least 2 reviewers. My current experience is not very good in pushing larger things there, ext2fs did not find any reviewer for a year, WPA enterprise implementation with WiFi improvements and clean ups are also waiting. In case of FUSE I am not even trying because at least one highly respected RTI advocate was strong opponent of this FUSE implementation even during his SUN carreer. Best regards, Milan I hope you're not referring to me above. I'd like to see these move ahead, but have not had time to review... I am not counting you as opponent, I count you as supporter with different implementation, there are others :-) Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Mount NTFS USB under OmniOS
Hi Gary, On 03.01.2013 00:50, Gary Mills wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:38:44PM -0500, Gordon Ross wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote: It would require to have somebody pushing it to Illumos, with at least 2 reviewers. My current experience is not very good in pushing larger things there, ext2fs did not find any reviewer for a year, WPA enterprise implementation with WiFi improvements and clean ups are also waiting. In case of FUSE I am not even trying because at least one highly respected RTI advocate was strong opponent of this FUSE implementation even during his SUN carreer. I hope you're not referring to me above. I'd like to see these move ahead, but have not had time to review... The problem seems to be, and I'm guilty of this myself, is that too many people are working on development and too few people are doing reviews. In many cases, I don't feel competent to review a change because I'm not familiar with the area in question. Is the code review supposed to examine only the quality of the code, or is it also supposed to determine if the code will actually function correctly? I can generally do the former, but often not the latter. If the submitter includes information on the test framework they used, is that all that's needed for the function of the code? The problem with missing reviewers existed for all my SUN life and probably even before that. Nobody wants to waste his time on something he has no own interest (and sometimes even if he has). If we will wait for 2 experts in area then we will never touch many places in code. Even in SUN it was hard to find so many people with expertise of some parts of system. But I cannot criticize people, I do not spend enough time on reviews these days. TODO list is too long and my time is too short for Illumos/OI. Sorry. Reviewer doing evaluation of the quality of the code is frequently much better than expert reviewer with no time. I am not RTI advocate so I cannot decide how good must reviewer be, of course. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Building Node.js
Hi, http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe node.js and new GCC part of that repo. Best regards, Milan On so, 2012-12-15 at 22:57 -0500, Alan Gutierrez wrote: I'm a confused as to which compiler to use for userland C/C++ on Open Indiana. There is no compiler installed. I vaguely recall that Sun had it's own compiler that it preferred to GCC. While looking around the Open Indiana website, I'm finding discussions of how or whether to use Sun Studio and various flavors of GCC to compile the kernel. I'm not sure what to install, or what effect installing one compiler over another will have on my system. If I want to build software that will work on other people's systems, I don't know which compiler they'd be likely to use, or how to test that any C or C++ code I write would work for other Open Indiana users. Here's a page on the Illumos website desribing of a common build environment that makes me wonder which of these compilers listed is the best userland compiler to use. http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/Build+Environment Here is a long discussion of compilers from the beginning of the year. It is fascinating, but it does not seem to provide any direction. http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/2012-January/001082.html For starters, I want to be able to build Node.js and compile Node.js modules that may include C/C++ code. I'd like to be able to explore DTrace once I have Node.js compiled. These instructions suggest installing gcc-3, but that compiler is rather old. http://instance.io/blog/compiling-node-js-and-npm-on-openindiana-oi_151 Any pointers on which compiler to use or how to manage multiple compilers? -- Alan Gutierrez - @bigeasy ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Conflicting packages
Hi, I obsoleted blas package, refreshed xblas and lapack and published new octave, I hope it resolved your problems. Best regards, Milan On čt, 2012-11-29 at 08:56 +, Paul Johnston wrote: Hi I'm trying to build octave this is the tail of my first attempt: ... checking for sgemm_ in -lblas... (cached) no checking for sgemm_ in -lblas... (cached) no configure: error: You are required to have BLAS and LAPACK libraries paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ pfexec pkg install blas Packages to install: 7 Create boot environment: No Create backup boot environment: No DOWNLOAD PKGS FILESXFER (MB) Completed 7/7 72/72 4.0/4.0 PHASEACTIONS Install Phase310/310 PHASE ITEMS Package State Update Phase 7/7 Image State Update Phase 2/2 paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ pfexec pkg install lapack Creating Plan | pkg install: The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/lib/libblas.so: pkg://sfe/library/lapack@3.4.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181337Z pkg://sfe/library/math/blas@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T183737Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/lib/libblas.a: pkg://sfe/library/lapack@3.4.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181337Z pkg://sfe/library/math/blas@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T183737Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ I assume the and in BLAS and LAPACK is a proper and so any ideas? paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/lapack-3.4.2$ uname -a SunOS smartos1 5.11 oi_151a7 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Cheers Paul ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Conflicting packages
Hi, I will look at it in the next days. Best regards, Milan On 29.11.2012 11:29, Aurélien Larcher wrote: Indeed you are right: larcher@na75:~$ pkg contents -r blas PATH usr usr/lib usr/lib/libblas.a usr/lib/libblas.so larcher@na75:~$ pkg contents -r lapack PATH usr usr/lib usr/lib/libblas.a usr/lib/libblas.so usr/lib/liblapack.a usr/lib/liblapack.so usr/lib/liblapacke.a usr/lib/liblapacke.so I guess we should report to SFE maintainers. For the moment just having the lapack package seems enough though. Moreover in https://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/spec-files-extra/file/65bca4bb8413/SFEoctave.spec You can see that the package depends on xblas and lapack and that in that case the blas library is called libxblas.so such that there is no conflict. larcher@na75:~$ pkg contents -r xblas PATH usr usr/include usr/include/blas_dense_proto.h usr/include/blas_enum.h usr/include/blas_extended.h usr/include/blas_extended_private.h usr/include/blas_extended_proto.h usr/include/blas_fpu.h usr/include/blas_malloc.h usr/include/f2c-bridge.h usr/lib usr/lib/amd64 usr/lib/amd64/libxblas.so usr/lib/amd64/libxblas.so.1 usr/lib/amd64/libxblas.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/libxblas.so usr/lib/libxblas.so.1 usr/lib/libxblas.so.1.0.0 Best regards, Aurelien On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Paul Johnston paul.johns...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: Hi I'm trying to build octave this is the tail of my first attempt: ... checking for sgemm_ in -lblas... (cached) no checking for sgemm_ in -lblas... (cached) no configure: error: You are required to have BLAS and LAPACK libraries paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ pfexec pkg install blas Packages to install: 7 Create boot environment: No Create backup boot environment: No DOWNLOAD PKGS FILESXFER (MB) Completed 7/7 72/72 4.0/4.0 PHASEACTIONS Install Phase310/310 PHASE ITEMS Package State Update Phase 7/7 Image State Update Phase 2/2 paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ pfexec pkg install lapack Creating Plan | pkg install: The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/lib/libblas.so: pkg://sfe/library/lapack@3.4.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181337Z pkg://sfe/library/math/blas@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T183737Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/lib/libblas.a: pkg://sfe/library/lapack@3.4.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T181337Z pkg://sfe/library/math/blas@1.1,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120807T183737Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/octave-3.6.3$ I assume the and in BLAS and LAPACK is a proper and so any ideas? paulj@smartos1:~/Downloads/lapack-3.4.2$ uname -a SunOS smartos1 5.11 oi_151a7 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Cheers Paul ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zone install hangs/never completes
Hi, On ne, 2012-11-11 at 17:00 +0100, Achim Wolpers wrote: `ptree` 929 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd 6652 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd 6653 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd 6657 -bash 7044 zoneadm -z wolke install 7046 /bin/ksh -p /usr/lib/brand/ipkg/pkgcreatezone -z wolke -R /tank/zone/wolke 7246 /usr/bin/python2.6 /usr/bin/pkg image-create -f --no-refresh --zone --full -p o truss -p 7246 pstack 7246 ? What is it trying to do? Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Availability of c-icap with clamav support?
Hi, OK, so your own build of c-icap works and build from SFE repo does not, with the same configs? Best regards, Milan On út, 2012-11-06 at 08:29 +0100, Andrej Javoršek wrote: Hello, unless there is some simple procedure I will avoid debugging that. I'm not a programer and have never before done that kind of debugging. But if it helps: version (0.2.2) that I downloaded and compiled from SF works. Best Regards Andrej On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote: On 2012-11-05 13:02, Andrej Javoršek wrote: Current client complains with: Error connecting to socket (host: ?P??) . Failed to connect to icap server. That P inside brackets has changed from @ and before from ? in consecutive runs. And setting parameter -i (localhost | actual IP) does not help. Off the top of my head, this seems like uncareful work with strings as command-line parameters and/or their copies. In particular, this seems like the pointers to the strings (host and port) were released and later these pointer values were reused while the in-memory data was overwritten. Or the pointers were not initialized to NULL and were used before receiving any proper value to point into. Do you have any chance to step the code through a debugger to test? Or use poor-man's probes and printf the interesting variables at different points in the execution?.. HTH, //Jim __**_ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@**openindiana.orgOpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/**mailman/listinfo/openindiana-**discusshttp://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE multimedia players and codecs
Hi, it would be good to say which packages you installed. Yes, vlc is broken in SFE encumbered because there is no stable spec for it and the old one pushed to the repo is broken on newer systems. I use mplayer from SFE encumbered without issues. That is the one I care about, the rest depends on own maintainers (mplayer2 and vlc). After finishing JDS/Gnome updated in OI I publish more gstreamer plugins so totem will be able to play more things. Best regards, Milan On ne, 2012-11-04 at 08:52 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote: I've tried to install some multimedia support to that OI laptop of mine, and while all the codec packages seem to have been selected and installed, the multitude of installed players refuse to play anything - from MP3's to movies. I was surprised to see even VLC refuse to do anything, though I previously thought that it has some codecs of their own implementation built in (not shared from external libraries). Anyhow, are there any hoops to jump through beside installing the players and codecs, so that the former would know about the latter? Thanks, //Jim ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Hi, On út, 2012-10-30 at 13:27 -0400, låzaro wrote: Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always have the step in the next time. That project look like very good with a lot of good toys... at first - why to make new fork if there is one already - MATE ? at second - currently I am the only one paying attention to (read as working on) JDS consolidation with Gnome for OI, I did not see many volunteers. at third - the last Gnome 2 with some additional patches from MATE is good enough for now, my plan is to stay on this way for some time if possible. at forth - I hope somebody will go and work on Xfce port, which is currently unmaintained in SFE because I have no spare time for that. There are few known issues and some updates are needed. And I think Xfce would be good enough replacement in some time at fifth - Oracle team did some work on Gnome 3 on top of Solaris, they have to publish it if they will distribute it. I am not saying I will help with Gnome 3 on top of OI but somebody else could do that. Please, do not fork anything, work on needed bits and share. Either in Illumos or Userland or JDS or SFE or documentation etc. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Hi, On so, 2012-11-03 at 09:07 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 11/ 3/12 08:55 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: at fifth - Oracle team did some work on Gnome 3 on top of Solaris, they have to publish it if they will distribute it. I am not saying I will help with Gnome 3 on top of OI but somebody else could do that. A bunch of that was already published in the trunk branch of spec-files. (The JDS model was always that development/testing happened in trunk, and then every 6 months or so, usually following the GNOME upstream stable release, they'd pull stuff from trunk into a stable branch for integration to the WOS - since GNOME 3 wasn't ready to go into the WOS for Solaris 11 or 11.1, trunk has been diverging more than normal from the stable branches.) I know but JDS stopped to update public SVN repo during spring and they did not resolve the situation yet. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Availability of c-icap with clamav support?
Hi Andrej, On út, 2012-10-30 at 21:51 +0100, Andrej Javoršek wrote: I can try to do that, but I'm missing up-to-date instructions how to build/prepare SFE package since instructions from wiki ( http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Building+SFE+Packages) are more than a year and half old and are referring to (now unavailable) patched version of SunStudio. c-icap-modules should contain clamav support, I updated packages in the repo now. I stopped to use it some time ago because I had stability issues with vscan support in ZFS from its beginning. No idea about the current quality. Yes, wiki page is not updated, e.g. because I have no time to do that and oi-cbe needs updates. You do not need the old Studio version, you can go and download the latest from Oracle. Probably some tweaks are needed in the script on wiki but, sorry, I have no time for updating it, somebody else should go through that. Best regards, Milan Best Regards Andrej On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote: 2012-10-30 16:03, Andrej Javoršek пишет: Hello, couple of years back I builded zfs vscan solution using this manual: http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/**uploads/vscanclamav.pdfhttp://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/vscanclamav.pdf While this server still works I decided to update/refresh/rebuild -it with newer versions of components. On today (modern) version of OI I can find both packages already included (in sfe) but it seems that c-icap is missing support for clamav?! Are there any other packages or workarounds to enable that support since I would like to avoid self-build/self-suport of those components. I think, the best solution would be to do the self-build once more based on the SFE recipes, adding the options you need, and when you are satisfied with the result - integrate the recipe changes along with rationale for the changes upstream to SFE (I think you'd need to mail Milan Jurik for more details). HTH, //Jim Klimov __**_ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@**openindiana.orgOpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/**mailman/listinfo/openindiana-**discusshttp://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Newbie server testing...
Hi, On čt, 2012-10-25 at 05:05 -0700, John Doe wrote: Hi, [...] Then, for testing, I needed to put some data from an ext3 usb drive on the raidz2... So I had to first install ext2 support: pfexec pkgadd -d SFEe2fsprogs.pkg SFElibiconv SFEe2fsprogs pfexec pkgadd -d SUNWext2fs.pkg SUNWext2fs from where did you download these packages? It worked, but the file transfer (rsync -avH) was VERY slow (only 179G in 15 hours)... It could be. Either USB support or ext2(3)fs is slow in your case. From the logs: Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 device (usb4fc,c15) operating at hi speed (USB 2.x) on USB 2.0 external hub: storage@1, scsa2usb0 at bus address 5 Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] Sunplus Technology Inc. USB to Serial-ATA bridge ST2000DL00S2H7J90C602099 Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] scsa2usb0 is /pci@0,0/pci15d9,62f@1d/hub@1/storage@1 Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /pci@0,0/pci15d9,62f@1d/hub@1/storage@1 (scsa2usb0) online Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 scsi: [ID 583861 kern.info] sd0 at scsa2usb0: target 0 lun 0 Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] sd0 is /pci@0,0/pci15d9,62f@1d/hub@1/storage@1/disk@0,0 Oct 24 12:05:49 clust-2 genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /pci@0,0/pci15d9,62f@1d/hub@1/storage@1/disk@0,0 (sd0) online Oct 24 12:09:58 clust-2 ufs: [ID 717476 kern.notice] NOTICE: mount: not a UFS magic number (0x0) Oct 24 12:22:07 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 800345 kern.notice] NOTICE: info: mount_count=0 Oct 24 12:22:07 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 854744 kern.notice] NOTICE: Setting ops, name=ext2fs Oct 24 12:22:07 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 302322 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2init end Oct 24 12:22:07 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 850434 kern.notice] NOTICE: DATAs_033: 13472722/244203520 files, 487818616/488378000 blocks Oct 24 12:55:50 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 118274 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2_iupdat 2 Oct 24 12:57:00 clust-2 last message repeated 190 times Oct 24 12:57:24 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 118274 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2_iupdat 2 Oct 24 13:03:30 clust-2 last message repeated 940 times Oct 24 13:04:15 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 118274 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2_iupdat 2 Oct 24 13:10:23 clust-2 last message repeated 955 times Oct 24 13:10:24 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 118274 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2_iupdat 2 Oct 24 13:16:25 clust-2 last message repeated 592 times ... Oct 25 03:03:41 clust-2 ext2fs: [ID 118274 kern.notice] NOTICE: ext2_iupdat 2 Oct 25 03:10:01 clust-2 last message repeated 94 times And that stops there at 3am because this morning I had been disconnected and when I went to the server, there was some kind of kernel panic (I think related to ext2fs) and it said something about dumping zfs stuff and rebooting... but it got stuck there and never rebooted. I cannot find the panic message... is it written somewhere or only on the screen? As root you should write savecore and if crashdump was created and is still on the disk, it will be exported to /var/crash/ Is the ext2fs module stable? I was using it several times a year ago and it was good enough for me but mostly for ext2 data transfer. Please, contact me off the list and we can look at it. Thx, JD Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Power management in OI
Hi Jim, On čt, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 +0400, Jim Klimov wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to set up power management on my oi_151a5 laptop. For one, I found a useful comment in this blog post: http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/07/12/using-the-cpu-power-management-features-in-solaris/ ...that cpupm (in /etc/power.conf) must include the poll-mode keyword: cpu-threshold 1s cpupm enable poll-mode At least, with this option set, I see reduced core speeds with kstat -m cpu_info -i 0 -s current_clock_Hz and powertop much more often than with just cpupm enable. Bumping the threshold to 3s also helped the CPU stay in reduced states much longer, because running GNOME seems to bite off about 3% user-time and about 3% kernel-time on this laptop, which causes the CPU to wake up often needlessly (IMHO). yes, poll-mode can be more effective on some systems. But not always what you see with kstat and powertop is what you have in real usage. powertop and kstat are a bit heavy tools which have impact on the reality (system does not decrease CPU speed if you are monitoring it). I am not sure HDD powersaving is viable, given there's 1 disk in the system and ZFS has something to flush every cycle, but there were no reportable problems with setting it up with http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2010/03/opensolaris-home-server-scripting-2-setting-power-management (however, I did not hear spindown-spinup when I set a 1s timeout). Now, I'm having a problem with suspend: when I do the action, the system falls out of X11 into text mode (empty screen with the cursor bar) and freezes. The box must be hard-rebooted afterwards. Logs include: Sep 2 12:14:41 nbofh genunix: [ID 535284 kern.notice] System is being suspended Sep 2 12:14:42 nbofh genunix: [ID 122848 kern.warning] WARNING: Unable to suspend device display@1. Sep 2 12:14:43 nbofh genunix: [ID 537702 kern.warning] WARNING: Device is busy or does not support suspend/resume. Sep 2 12:14:53 nbofh srn: [ID 980641 kern.warning] WARNING: srn_notify: clone 2 did not ack event a03 Sep 2 12:14:53 nbofh genunix: [ID 121466 kern.warning] WARNING: audiohd#0: Unable to restore value of control record-source Sep 2 12:14:54 nbofh genunix: [ID 583038 kern.notice] System has been resumed. Sep 2 12:22:52 nbofh genunix: [ID 576964 kern.notice] ^MOpenIndiana Build oi_151a5 64-bit (illumos 13740:836bfdf31fc4) Sep 2 12:22:52 nbofh genunix: [ID 107366 kern.notice] SunOS Release 5.11 - Copyright 1983-2010 Oracle and/or its affiliates. ... So, apparently, some device - the display (generic VESA VGA on the Radeon built into the AMD E2 CPU) or one of the audios (hdmi on the radeon or separate realtek chip) fail to suspend/resume and may cause the freeze. No surprise, the key problem is lack of support fo Radeon. System cannot sleep without implementation of it. Without fixing this it makes no sense to investigate it more. You need to look at system console, usually serial port, to see what happend after resume. Also, you can try to suspend and resume with disabled X server. On side notes: DPMI works ok to turn off the lights on the LCD screen. Suspend-resume worked OK in Win7, though I couldn't get that to hibernate for no apparent reason. Thanks for ideas, //Jim Klimov Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 151a7 ??
Hi, the homepage was not updated but the latest version is already 151a7 as you can see here: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_151a_prestable7+Release+Notes Best regards, Milan On ne, 2012-10-21 at 18:17 -0700, Reginald Beardsley wrote: FWIW I just did an install of 148 (CD on hand) on a spare system followed by an update via the website. I was expecting 151a5 based on the website and named my BE accordingly. However, on rebooting, I see that I actually installed 151a7. Other than that, nice job. Reg ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] I am having problems with Inkscape and convert producing PNG's
Hi Jon, On út, 2012-10-16 at 09:50 +0100, Jonathan Adams wrote: Cheers, I know you're doing your best, just checking if I was alone, or if there was a quick fix. I wish I had some knowledge of creating IPS packages, but the first step to producing a package loses me every time ... I have updated versions of rdesktop/vnc that'd be good to try ... and I was wondering if it was possible to convert Firefox/Thunderbird to IPS ... but I never got beyond starting up the local IPS server :) everything is possible, it is just matter of manpower :-) Ken Mays did some updates in specs for inkscape and imagemagick, I have to review them and publish new bits. Publishing FF and TB in IPS is not big problem, the problem is to keep it updated. I hope to find some way how to collaborate with Oracle on this. Still we have the latest FF and TB published on ftp.mozilla.org thanks one very good man. Best regards, Milan Jon On 16 October 2012 05:43, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote: Hi, *SNIP* It is known bug - https://www.illumos.org/issues/2706 Currently I spend time updating JDS and not in fight with bloody libpng. My vision is to build everything in JDS with libpng 1.4, to solve all these problems. If anybody has time for fixing SFE ImageMagick to build with older libpng temporarily then he is welcome to prepare fix and I can push the results to the repository :-) Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] I am having problems with Inkscape and convert producing PNG's
Hi, On po, 2012-10-15 at 12:12 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Jonathan Adams wrote: it's the same message on both, I'm not sure if Inkscape is using convert to produce the file. jadams@jadlaptop:~/images$ convert Mylogo.svg /tmp/Mylogo.png convert: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.44 `/tmp/Mylogo.png' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1781. convert: Application is running with png.c from libpng-1.4.3 `/tmp/Mylogo.png' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1781. convert: Incompatible libpng version in application and library `/tmp/Mylogo.png' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1781. convert: memory allocation failed `/tmp/Mylogo.png' @ error/png.c/WriteOnePNGImage/8873. jadams@jadlaptop:/sal/images$ pkg list | egrep -i inkscape|png|magick image/editor/imagemagick (sfe)6.7.6.10-0.151.1.5 i-- image/editor/inkscape (sfe) 0.48.2-0.151.1.5 i-- image/library/g++/imagemagick (sfe) 6.7.6.10-0.151.1.5 i-- image/library/libpng 0.5.11-0.151.1.7 i-- SFE ImageMagick has a bug and this should be reported to the OpenIndiana SFE bug tracker. The bug can be illustrated by executing 'convert -list format' and looking at the details for PNG: PNG* PNG rw- Portable Network Graphics (libpng 1.2.44,1.4.3) See http://www.libpng.org/ for details about the PNG format. What the error messages and the PNG detail information is telling us is that the png headers used do not match the png library used. Bob It is known bug - https://www.illumos.org/issues/2706 Currently I spend time updating JDS and not in fight with bloody libpng. My vision is to build everything in JDS with libpng 1.4, to solve all these problems. If anybody has time for fixing SFE ImageMagick to build with older libpng temporarily then he is welcome to prepare fix and I can push the results to the repository :-) Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] postgres as service on OI
Hi, On 02.10.2012 23:11, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, I am a bit of a newbie so bear with me. If I want postgres to start up automatically - where do I put the XML definition file to have it start as a service? are you building postgres yourself? Do you know that 9.0 and 9.1 are in repository (SFE)? Thanks. Boris. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] conky scripts
Hi, there is older 1.5.1 version of conky in SFE spec, so if somebody will take care about it and update the spec, I can push newer conky to the repository. Best regards, Milan Paolo Marcheschi píše v pá 21. 09. 2012 v 14:58 +0200: Thank you It works., and it's nice. you can install scons via pkg: sudo pkg install scons SUNWlua Ciao Paolo On 09/21/12 11:21 AM, openbabel wrote: Installo Scons: http://www.scons.org/ tolua++ uses SCons to build. SCons is based on python, you can get a stand-alone version on their website. After you have SCons, follow this simple instructions: $ tar xvzf scons-1.2.0.d20090919.tar.gz $ cd scons-1.2.0.d20090919 $ pfexec python setup.py install Installed SCons library modules into /usr/lib/scons-1.2.0.d20090919 Installed SCons scripts into /usr/bin Installed SCons man pages into /usr/man/man1 $ ls -lah /usr/bin/scon* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5.9K 2009-09-20 01:59 scons -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5.9K 2009-09-20 01:59 scons-1.2.0.d20090919 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 49K 2009-09-20 01:00 scons-time -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 49K 2009-09-20 01:00 scons-time-1.2.0.d20090919 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17K 2009-09-20 01:59 sconsign -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17K 2009-09-20 01:59 sconsign-1.2.0.d20090919 Installo TOLUA++: $ pfexec pkg install SUNWlua ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI stopped booting after 151a6 update.
Hi Dmitry, thank you. I can reproduce it on my system now in 32-bit mode only. I am trying to find for investigation asap. Best regards, Milan On 17.09.2012 13:13, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote: Hi Milan, What I need it is described here: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150#note-5 https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150#note-9 I need to collect data to see if all cases are same. $ svcs -xv svc:/system/hal:default svc:/system/hal:default (Hardware Abstraction Layer daemon) State: maintenance since September 17, 2012 01:56:44 PM YEKT Reason: Start method exited with $SMF_EXIT_ERR_FATAL. See: http://illumos.org/msg/SMF-8000-KS See: man -M /usr/man -s 1M hald See: /var/svc/log/system-hal:default.log Impact: 2 dependent services are not running: svc:/system/filesystem/rmvolmgr:default svc:/application/graphical-login/gdm:default # /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no | more Runner started - allowed paths are '/usr/lib/hal:/usr/lib/hal:/usr/bin' (process:677): GLib-WARNING **: giounix.c:405Error while getting flags for FD: E rror 0 (0) 681: XYA attempting to get lock on /media/.hal-mtab-lock 681: XYA got lock on /media/.hal-mtab-lock in hal-storage-cleanup-all-mountpoints hal_mtab = '' 681: XYA released lock on /media/.hal-mtab-lock Sep 17 14:41:56 www fdc: fd0 at fdc0 Sep 17 14:41:56 www genunix: fd0 is /pci@0,0/isa@1/fdc@1,3f0/fd@0,0 ... similar messages ... Sep 17 14:42:58 www genunix: bpf0 is /pseudo/bpf@0 MMC-3 Here it hangs, and I have to Ctrl-C it. Interesting that | more does not help, but without | more output is different for some reason. # /usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=yes gives no output, and returns to command prompt. I forgot to look at /var/svc/log/system-hal:default.log (sorry for this, I need to sleep more), will look at it if you need it. Regards, Dmitry. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI stopped booting after 151a6 update.
Hi, it would be nice if people affected by this are active on that issue. Currently I have only one reporting person who wrote that the problem seems to be visible only in case that hald is daemonized. Ongoing investigation. I cannot reproduce it on my system (yet). Best regards, Milan On 13.09.2012 13:55, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote: Yes, it's the same. Production server affected... I am stick to 151a5 for a while. On 07.09.2012 18:23, Richard PALO wrote: It's possibly the same as a couple of us have suffered: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150 Le 07/09/12 14:20, Dmitry Kozhinov a écrit : Thank you, Andrey, for pointing me into right direction. Now I have figured out that it does not hang, but stops at console login prompt. GUI not loads for some reason. Graphics card is ATI Radeon 9600. How do I inspect a boot log (if any)? Maybe the reason of the glitch is that online updates not always go smoothly, especially when there was many incremental updates already for given system. I remember that I already had similar problem, and fresh install did resolve it (cannot remember OSol or OI). Maybe I will reinstall the whole system at next week. Though it is a production server, there is not much to configure. Apache, vsftpd, and content files. Downtime is not critical. Though reinstall may help, it would be useful to find out what went wrong. On 07.09.2012 1:03, Andrey Sokolov wrote: Hi, Where does OI hang? Use -v option for kernel and boot without progress bar 2012/9/6 Dmitry Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com Hi all, I have a quite old machine running OI: ASUS A7N8X-X motherboard, Athlon XP 1150Mhz CPU, 1GB RAM. Everything worked fine until the 151a6 update. Now the boot process hangs (progress bar is moving, no HDD activity, nothing). Previous 151a5 BE boots fine. Any advices appreciated. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI stopped booting after 151a6 update.
Hi, interesting you see it on T61p which is not far from my T60. What I need it is described here: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150#note-5 https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150#note-9 I need to collect data to see if all cases are same. Best regards, Milan Gary Gendel píše v čt 13. 09. 2012 v 10:49 -0400: Milan, Please contact me directly if you need me to run some experiments or collect some data. I tried Richard Palo's workaround but it only worked in the current session; a reboot brought it back and wouldn't go away with a re-applied fix. I blew a6 away, but I can put it back if you tell me what you want me to try. BTW, this is on a Lenovo Thinkpad T61p. Gary On 9/13/12 10:40 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, it would be nice if people affected by this are active on that issue. Currently I have only one reporting person who wrote that the problem seems to be visible only in case that hald is daemonized. Ongoing investigation. I cannot reproduce it on my system (yet). Best regards, Milan On 13.09.2012 13:55, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote: Yes, it's the same. Production server affected... I am stick to 151a5 for a while. On 07.09.2012 18:23, Richard PALO wrote: It's possibly the same as a couple of us have suffered: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3150 Le 07/09/12 14:20, Dmitry Kozhinov a écrit : Thank you, Andrey, for pointing me into right direction. Now I have figured out that it does not hang, but stops at console login prompt. GUI not loads for some reason. Graphics card is ATI Radeon 9600. How do I inspect a boot log (if any)? Maybe the reason of the glitch is that online updates not always go smoothly, especially when there was many incremental updates already for given system. I remember that I already had similar problem, and fresh install did resolve it (cannot remember OSol or OI). Maybe I will reinstall the whole system at next week. Though it is a production server, there is not much to configure. Apache, vsftpd, and content files. Downtime is not critical. Though reinstall may help, it would be useful to find out what went wrong. On 07.09.2012 1:03, Andrey Sokolov wrote: Hi, Where does OI hang? Use -v option for kernel and boot without progress bar 2012/9/6 Dmitry Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com Hi all, I have a quite old machine running OI: ASUS A7N8X-X motherboard, Athlon XP 1150Mhz CPU, 1GB RAM. Everything worked fine until the 151a6 update. Now the boot process hangs (progress bar is moving, no HDD activity, nothing). Previous 151a5 BE boots fine. Any advices appreciated. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How to help if you are not developer: Re: OpenIndiana lead Alasdair Lumsden resigns
Hi Bob, Bob Friesenhahn píše v út 11. 09. 2012 v 14:22 -0500: On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Milan Jurik wrote: And probably other things which do not come to my mind just now. Documentation was always good thing in Solaris, we had team of dedicated people working on it. Do you think it is good area for you? It would be useful to build up a comparison matrix of top packages in the Debian Popularity Contest (http://popcon.debian.org/) and compare these packages to the ones that OpenIndiana currently offers to make sure that OpenIndiana is not ignoring popular packages which might easily compile and be useful on OpenIndiana. I would prefer to avoid such way. Sun internal people know how such thing ends... Packages should be added by people who need them and volunteer to maintain them. Otherwise system is full of popular packages which are not maintained. Also useful to look at each package that OpenIndiana currently offers and see how much out of date it is and what newer release version the package could be updated to to without causing harm (e.g. can it work with libraries that OpenIndiana already provides). Lastly, the CVEs (security alerts) applicable to OpenIndiana should be collected so that it can be known which applications have important security issues. Both these can help, mainly to Meths. If there is such volunteer, he should contact Meths and ask him privately. Bob Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How to help if you are not developer: Re: OpenIndiana lead Alasdair Lumsden resigns
Hi Jan, Jan Owoc píše v st 12. 09. 2012 v 07:37 -0600: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Michael Schuster michaelspriv...@gmail.com wrote: something else that comes to mind where a non-programmer can help: Testing. While I'm by no means an expert in this subject, I can think of: installation tests (which HW? how long? are the results as expected), [...] I have OI running on some hardware that isn't on the HCL (yet). Is there some sort of test suite that I can run to verify what is working (even if it's a list of components that need to be checked by hand)? Otherwise I could only speak of compatibility for the 3 hardware components I actually use. no, we have no such thing like HCTS used by Sun. But if you have good experience with some HW, feel free to place it on HCL, usually it is better to have somebody with good experience than results of some artificial test suite. Jan Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] How to help if you are not developer: Re: OpenIndiana lead Alasdair Lumsden resigns
Hi Bryan, Bryan N Iotti píše v st 05. 09. 2012 v 20:25 +0200: Folks, I got on board the OI boat seriously back in April. I love it. It has pushed me to learn a lot about Solaris as an OS and certain technologies (like SAS, SCSI) that probably wouldn't have had a place on the Mac I sold. I want to work with it and use it in solutions I propose to Vet clinics and the like. I am not a programmer (I do some basic Ruby and shell scripting), so I wouldn't really know how to help with code, but I'd like to help with the website and wiki. Can I help, and if so, how do I get started? you can do many things: 1) there are missing manpages for some commands, so you can write text for them, it is preferred in manpage format, so it can be easy to add to the system 2) you can write new documentation for users on wiki, of course 3) you can write articles about your use cases on some blog. It looks like planet.illumos.org is gone but it should not be big problem to do something with it. And probably other things which do not come to my mind just now. Documentation was always good thing in Solaris, we had team of dedicated people working on it. Do you think it is good area for you? Best regards, Milan Bryan On 09/ 5/12 05:21 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Magnus mag...@yonderway.com wrote: On Sep 4, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: I expect that this became available in oi_151a_prestable5 (however, oi_151a_prestable6 is out today!). I'm looking at http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/ and it looks like 151a5 is the latest available to the public right now. oi_151a_prestable6 AKA oi_151a6 is a bug and security fix release. This is not an ISO release. [1] Making an ISO image takes time, so tends to happen every 2-3 releases. You need to install prestable5 and then upgrade. [1] http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_151a_prestable6+Release+Notes Does this require the end user to do anything special, or should it just work when installing OI? Right now some other Illumos distros are not handling these drives well at all yet. My drive is coming up as WDC WD2002FAEX-0 revision 1D05. I don't think the drive's model number or revision will change with a system update. I don't know whether it detects sector size or simply uses ashift=12 always (using 4k data sectors on a 512b drive doesn't exactly have downsides). Either way it shouldn't require any manual user intervention. Some drives behave by reporting 4k sectors (not sure about yours specifically), and then even OI 151a (what I used) created a pool with ashift=12 when needed. root@openindiana:~# zdb -C rpool | grep ashift ashift: 9 root@openindiana:~# zdb -C tankz2 | grep ashift ashift: 12 root@openindiana:~# uname -a SunOS openindiana 5.11 oi_151a4 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Jan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss --ms090806040901060907080805-- ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB WiFi dongel? / N Standard wifi
Hi Heinz, Heinz Nikolaus Gies píše v ne 09. 09. 2012 v 18:41 +0200: Hi everyone, I wonder if anyone has experience with a USB wifi don gel for OI? Preferable N standard (300M speed). While the stick I currently have somewhat works it totally fails with WAP2 (or wap+wap2) configurations and does not get any useful connectivity even with plain WAP (even so dhcp works ping does not). I had good experience with (now old) ZyDAS dongles but it is few years back. Which model do you use? Any advice/known working models? Regards and many thank in advance, Heinz Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] LiveUSB and oi_151a5
Hi, Jim Klimov píše v út 28. 08. 2012 v 22:09 +0400: [...] How lacking is USB3 support? Would the ports not work at all, or can they drop back to compatibility modes like USB1 or USB2? Can they be passed through as is to a VM (VirtualBox, KVM) that would have drivers to support them better? ;) The USB3 ports did not work with the OS - not even for the mouse. One port is powered, so the mouse laser shined there ;) no surprise, USB3 HCI chips are not supported by Illumos at all. Also the WiFi driver is missing, at least from the LiveCD - apparently the laptop uses a BCM 4313 WiFi abgn chip, IIRC. Does anyone know off the headtop if that driver is in OI, or where it can be found? I'll go google for that now ;) I've already seen that Broadcom opensourced their drivers for Linux 2 years ago, and the code drop included support for this chip... Opensourced under GPLv2 license? Or published documentation? No, Broadcom WiFi chips are not supported by Illumos :-( Hope this report amuses some and helps others, //Jim Klimov Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE postgres 9.1 doesn't install
Hi, On 27.08.2012 10:45, solarg wrote: On 08/25/12 10:11 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, solarg wrote: hello francois, wouldn't it be better to post this on SFE devel list: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgbuild-sfe-devel Not necessarily. There is a SFE for Solaris 11 and another for OpenIndiana since Solaris 11 and OpenIndiana are not the same. The OpenIndiana packages may have some modification from the originals at SourceForge. OpenIndiana SFE does have its own bug tracker (which is actively monitored and used). Bob pfff... SFE for S11, SFE for OI, OpenCSW for everyone, but in every case, micro-community... how long before people will abandon ? there is one SFE and several binary distributions for different operating systems (S11 and OI). Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE postgres 9.1 doesn't install
Hi, Francois Dion píše v pá 24. 08. 2012 v 21:13 -0400: # pkg install pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91 Creating Plan - pkg install: The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/postgres/9.1/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/postgres-9.1.mo: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T091000Z pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T090943Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/postgres/9.1/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/pg_ctl-9.1.mo: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T091000Z pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T090943Z and so on and so forth... Version 9.0 works ok. I am still trying to find the correct way how to package postgres. The spec for 9.0 and 9.1 is not very IPS friendly. I hope I will complete it soon. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SFE postgres 9.1 doesn't install
Hi, it should be fixed now. Best regards, Milan Francois Dion píše v pá 24. 08. 2012 v 21:13 -0400: # pkg install pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91 Creating Plan - pkg install: The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/postgres/9.1/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/postgres-9.1.mo: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T091000Z pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T090943Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/postgres/9.1/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/pg_ctl-9.1.mo: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T091000Z pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.5,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120819T090943Z and so on and so forth... Version 9.0 works ok. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Wifi support in OI text image
Hi, where is it discussed? Isn't dladm *-wifi working? Or do you need some text UI during installation? Best regards, Milan On 21.08.2012 16:16, Jim Klimov wrote: Hello world, As is currently discussed on the list, the text installer image seems to lack support of WiFi connectivity. While this really is an unlikely component of an enterprise server, which would have multiple wired links instead, small HomeNAS installs might require that WiFi after all, and they might not want or be able to use the GUI install option which is geared towards desktops and includes WiFi. I wonder if it would make sense to either provide WiFi support and drivers in the base text image, or if the added footprint useless to true servers is deemed too big, at least preload a small repository with these drivers onto the ISO and document how to install it from there (though this might hinder home-nas installations over SSH into the live environment)? What do you think? //Jim Klimov ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Wifi support in OI text image
Hi, On 21.08.2012 16:24, Jim Klimov wrote: 2012-08-21 18:18, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, where is it discussed? Isn't dladm *-wifi working? Or do you need some text UI during installation? The thread Probably small question discusses installation of OI on an EeePC under the premise that the GUI Live image discovered and supported the WiFi of the computer, while the Text live image and subsequent installed OS did not. really good subject of e-mail I am sorry I am not reading every e-mail in the list these days. I do not currently have an untampered text-based OS to verify and validate that claim - or presence/lack of wifi support in the text installer image. Still, I see how this can be a problem to newcomers not savvy in OpenSolaris networking new features and tools. At the very least, this may be a problem of documentation and communication. Newcommer should use GUI. Text-install lacks support for easy wifi configuration but the whole WiFi stack, including management tools, should be there. //Jim Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update errors re: gcc, gmp, mpc, etc.
Hi Marc, Marc Williams píše v so 18. 08. 2012 v 14:45 -0700: On 08/ 4/12 03:38 PM, Marc Williams wrote: Today I ran update manager and I'm given a slew of errors regarding the packages mentioned in the subject. Not exactly sure how to resolve it as wanting to remove one or the other might not work because everything depends on everything else. Due to other projects and the crazy heat (no air conditioner) I haven't used the machine with OI on it until today. I ran Update Manager and all was good today. No problems with updates. Thanks Milan, it was just a matter of time and your rebuilds I guess. nice to hear somebody's problem was solved. OI SFE is mostly rebuild, few bits remains. The same encumbered repo, with one big exception - vlc is not ready for rebuild because older versions are not compatible with new ffmpeg and new version is not ready yet. mplayer and mplayer2 are available (you can install only one of them and I maintain the first one only). The last two updates did produce two 151a-5 backup BEs though. First time I've seen those. New feature of pkg, backup BEs are produced if you are not doing update but install/uninstall bits. Good work guys. Marc The next step is to fix remaining OI SFE bugs and RFEs and slowly add new packages. If you will find any problem, log it here: https://www.illumos.org/projects/oi-sfe/issues Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update errors re: gcc, gmp, mpc, etc.
Hi Ken, done Best regards, Milan ken mays píše v ne 19. 08. 2012 v 10:45 -0700: Please build the wine spec. -- On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 3:25 AM EDT Milan Jurik wrote: Hi Marc, Marc Williams píše v so 18. 08. 2012 v 14:45 -0700: On 08/ 4/12 03:38 PM, Marc Williams wrote: Today I ran update manager and I'm given a slew of errors regarding the packages mentioned in the subject. Not exactly sure how to resolve it as wanting to remove one or the other might not work because everything depends on everything else. Due to other projects and the crazy heat (no air conditioner) I haven't used the machine with OI on it until today. I ran Update Manager and all was good today. No problems with updates. Thanks Milan, it was just a matter of time and your rebuilds I guess. nice to hear somebody's problem was solved. OI SFE is mostly rebuild, few bits remains. The same encumbered repo, with one big exception - vlc is not ready for rebuild because older versions are not compatible with new ffmpeg and new version is not ready yet. mplayer and mplayer2 are available (you can install only one of them and I maintain the first one only). The last two updates did produce two 151a-5 backup BEs though. First time I've seen those. New feature of pkg, backup BEs are produced if you are not doing update but install/uninstall bits. Good work guys. Marc The next step is to fix remaining OI SFE bugs and RFEs and slowly add new packages. If you will find any problem, log it here: https://www.illumos.org/projects/oi-sfe/issues Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Calibre doc converter to ebooks formats for OpenIndiana??
Hi, Jan Owoc píše v čt 09. 08. 2012 v 07:37 -0600: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote: Sooner or later Python 3.2 will be provided in OI SFE but I am not sure how much it can coexists with 2.6 Many GNU/Linux distributions have both a Python2 and a Python3 in their repositories. I happen to have both installed on one of my systems. The way it works is similar to how it's frequently done with gcc, where there is a series of symbolic links, with the plain python command pointing toward the version that is considered most universal: ~$ ls -l /usr/bin/pyth* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 23 10:06 /usr/bin/python - python2.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 23 10:06 /usr/bin/python2 - python2.7 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2989480 Jul 31 23:40 /usr/bin/python2.7 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root1652 Jul 31 23:40 /usr/bin/python2.7-config lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 17 11:20 /usr/bin/python2-config - python2.7-config lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 14 23:13 /usr/bin/python3 - python3.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 May 3 09:52 /usr/bin/python3.2 - python3.2mu -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2954048 May 3 09:52 /usr/bin/python3.2mu lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Apr 14 23:13 /usr/bin/python3mu - python3.2mu lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 17 11:20 /usr/bin/python-config - python2.7-config When I have a program that *requires* Python 3.2, it usually knows (or can be configured) to call python3. well, for long time we had python 2.4 and 2.6 in OpenSolaris. So the infrastructure is in place, only somebody has to prepare bits for oi-build. In SFE there is spec for python3, only clash in deliverables is 2to3 which is delivered by OI 2.6 already. Cheers, Jan Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Calibre doc converter to ebooks formats for OpenIndiana??
Hi, On 08.08.2012 22:29, Francois Dion wrote: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Ray Arachelian r...@arachelian.com wrote: On 08/08/2012 05:03 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Is there a version of the Calibre ebook/epub doc converter for OpenIndiana? Or any other SW that can convert a PDF book to epub? Epub (or other ebook formats) are much more readable on smartphones than standard PDFs ususally are, due to the text reflow capability. So I'd like to be able to convert even large pdf docs to some ebook format, so I can take large manuals along on trips. Sadly I don't think it's been built on OI. There are Linux, OS X and windows version - I guess you could install Ubuntu inside KVM and try it there? It's an amazing program. Just looked at it, it requires PyQT4 and that means QT4... Is there a prebuilt QT4? yes, there are gcc and Sun Studio stdcxx based in OpenIndiana SFE repo. I tried to built Calibre few times many months back but it has more dependencies you need to solve and I had not enough energy to finish it. I recommend to go with GCC builds of libraries in this case if somebody wants to do that. Francois Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update errors re: gcc, gmp, mpc, etc.
Hi Bob, Bob Friesenhahn píše v ne 05. 08. 2012 v 10:48 -0500: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Milan Jurik wrote: Hi, as I wrote a week ago, OI SFE repository is work in progress these days because I am slowly rebuilding all components and fixing old packaging bugs. For additional details see http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-July/008882.html I have also been blocked by this issue. I do understand that it is a volunteer effort and am very thankful for that effort. It would be useful to know if the on-going SFE packaging effort will eventually magically repair these package problems (which might be blocking OI updates as well) or if much/most/all of existing SFE installations will need to be uninstalled so that the new SFE packages can be installed. It is currently not clear how to uninstall older packages from the GUI since several of them seem to not be mentioned by the GUI even though 'pkg' still knows about them. Since yesterday, I don't seem to be finding GCC 4.6.2 or LLVM 3.1 that were there sometime earlier. could you do pkg refresh --full and confirm you cannot see developer/llvm and sfe/developer/gcc in GUI? Both are available there. Also older After rebuild of all packages it should be mostly smooth. I am trying to rename and obsolete bad packages. As I wrote earlier, if somebody has interest in some packages, send me e-mail privately and I will try to coordinate it with him. I cannot test everything, so after rebuild I will send e-mail asking for test and reports. I have a from-scratch GCC install which unfortunately used several of the libraries from SFE with the conflicts. I will re-do this with my own from-scratch install of those libraries so that my private compiler is not dependent on these SFE libraries. GCC packages and libraries needed for it are the worst thing in old OI SFE, new packages were published: sfe/developer/gcc sfe/library/gmp sfe/library/mpc sfe/library/mpfr Bob Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update errors re: gcc, gmp, mpc, etc.
Bob, runtime/gcc is something I am trying to deal with. I will mark it as renamed or obsoleted. I tried to rename it for now. Let see if it will work for you. Best regards, Milan Bob Friesenhahn píše v ne 05. 08. 2012 v 12:41 -0500: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Milan Jurik wrote: Since yesterday, I don't seem to be finding GCC 4.6.2 or LLVM 3.1 that were there sometime earlier. could you do pkg refresh --full and confirm you cannot see developer/llvm and sfe/developer/gcc in GUI? Both are available there. Also older I did find both of these in the GUI. Based on a search for 'gcc', only 'runtime/gcc' is currently shown as installed. The GUI is not showing the installed GCC 4.6. % pfexec pkg search developer/llvm INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE pkg.fmri setsfe/developer/llvm pkg:/developer/llvm@3.1-0.151.1.5 pkg.fmri setsfe/developer/llvm pkg:/developer/llvm@3.1-0.0.151.1.5 pkg.fmri setsfe/developer/llvm pkg:/developer/llvm@3.1-0.151.1.5 pkg.fmri setsfe/developer/llvm pkg:/developer/llvm@3.0-0.151.1 pkg.name setdeveloper/llvm pkg:/developer/llvm@3.0-0.151.1 % pfexec pkg list developer/llvm pkg list: no packages matching 'developer/llvm' installed % pfexec pkg search developer/gcc INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE pkg.fmri setsfe/sfe/developer/gcc pkg:/sfe/developer/gcc@4.6.3-0.151.1.5 pkg.fmri setsfe/sfe/developer/gcc pkg:/sfe/developer/gcc@4.6.3-0.0.151.1.5 % pfexec pkg list gcc NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION IFO runtime/gcc (sfe) 4.6.2-0.151.1 i-- % pfexec pkg list sfe/developer/gcc pkg list: no packages matching 'sfe/developer/gcc' installed % pfexec pkg list sfe/sfe/developer/gcc pkg list: no packages matching 'sfe/sfe/developer/gcc' installed % /usr/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.6.2 Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. % ls -l /usr/bin/gcc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jun 30 16:01 /usr/bin/gcc - ../gcc/4.6/bin/gcc* It seems that the GCC that SFE installed earlier has somehow been forgotten, even though it is still obviously installed (and I did not request to uninstall it). The only package I did request to (successfully) uninstall was LLVM 3.0. The most significant issue is the conflict for runtime/gcc since there are several other SFE packages which are depending on this package and so the existing one can not be uninstalled: The requested change to the system attempts to install multiple actions for legacy 'SFEgccruntime' with conflicting attributes: 1 package delivers 'legacy category=SFE,application desc=GNU gcc runtime libraries for applications - metapackage with symbolic links to version 4.6 runtime available in /usr/gcc /usr/gnu hotline=Please contact your local service provider name=GNU gcc runtime libraries for applications - metapackage with symbolic links to version 4.6 runtime available in /usr/gcc /usr/gnu pkg=SFEgccruntime vendor=http://pkgbuild.sf.net/spec-files-extra version=4.6.3,REV=110.0.4.2012.07.27.21.57': pkg://sfe/sfe/system/library/gcc-runtime@4.6.3,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120727T211210Z 1 package delivers 'legacy category=SFE,application desc=GNU gcc runtime libraries required by applications hotline=Please contact your local service provider name=GNU gcc runtime libraries required by applications pkg=SFEgccruntime vendor=http://pkgbuild.sf.net/spec-files-extra version=4.6.2,REV=110.0.4.2011.12.21.22.11': pkg://sfe/runtime/gcc@4.6.2,5.11-0.151.1:20111222T011404Z Bob ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installation issues for postgres-91 (sfe) on oi_151a5
Hi, On 30.07.2012 10:09, Ewald Ertl wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Andreas Stenius andreas.sten...@astekk.se wrote: Hi, Now that I have upgraded to oi_151a5 and try to install postgres 9.1 from SFE, pkg complains about conflicting files from: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.1 ,5.11-0.151.1:20120216T192151Z pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.1,5.11-0.151.1:20111030T184837Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. you are impacted by https://www.illumos.org/issues/1578 On a older system (151a or it may have been 151a3) it installed these same packages witout complaining. kaos@ganesha:~$ pkg info postgres-91 Name: database/postgres-91 Summary: PostgreSQL client tools Category: System/Databases (org.freedesktop) System Database () State: Installed Publisher: sfe Version: 9.1.1 Build Release: 5.11 Branch: 0.151.1 Packaging Date: 30 oktober 2011 18:48:37 Size: 8.99 MB FMRI: pkg://sfe/database/postgres-91@9.1.1,5.11-0.151.1:20111030T184837Z Name: service/database/postgres-91 Summary: PostgreSQL client tools Category: System/Databases (org.freedesktop) System Database () State: Installed Publisher: sfe Version: 9.1.1 Build Release: 5.11 Branch: 0.151.1 Packaging Date: 16 februari 2012 19:21:51 Size: 25.37 MB FMRI: pkg://sfe/service/database/postgres-91@9.1.1,5.11-0.151.1:20120216T192151Z Any hints on how to install postgres 9? It's not only postgres, I tried a pkg update on my laptop and get for a whole lot of packages from the sfe-repo errors of the form: The following packages all deliver file actions to usr/gcc/4.6/lib/libgomp.spec: pkg://sfe/sfe/system/library/gcc-46-runtime@4.6.3 ,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120727T211211Z pkg://sfe/runtime/gcc@4.6.2,5.11-0.151.1:20111222T011404Z These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting set may be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed. For many packages the pkg_fmri_pattern has changed and it seems, as if pkg doesn't recognize it as an update. Don't know if everything from sfe should be uninstalled and reinstalled or something other went wrong. currently OI SFE is work in progress. Some packages were broken and incompatible with the latest OI and also with SFE upstream. Including the basic packages. I am trying to rebuild them step by step with correct content and dependencies. runtime/gcc package will be either obsoleted or renamed in future and it is dead end for OI SFE, sfe/system/library/gcc-runtime is the replacement. I cannot promise smooth update for all SFE packages because there are some collisions with OI already which I cannot fix easily. Anyway, if you are interested in particular OI SFE packages, send me e-mail (private) with the list and I will increase their priorities in rebuilt list. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Upgrade failed
Hi, CJ Keist píše v st 18. 07. 2012 v 15:10 -0600: All, I was trying upgrade from oi_148 to oi_151a and it failed with message below: Update Phase 10094/33221 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp9vJXh7 should you wish to inspect it. pkg: The requested operation cannot be completed due to invalid package metadata. Details follow: The action 'file 2ff6ea65a68bd74b3557ffc6c90cedb08b6255b4 chash=815df70d5140e8e8516e7f97fe06472f833f0f20 elfarch=i386 elfbits=32 elfhash=41b25b80976e1fbf3cd52d18971a19adf7d77b9c group=smmsp mode=2555 owner=root path=usr/lib/sendmail pkg.csize=482068 pkg.size=1068700' in package 'pkg://openindiana.org/service/network/smtp/sendmail@8.14.4,5.11-0.151.1.5:20120630T193733Z' has invalid attribute(s): '/tmp/tmp9vJXh7/usr/lib/sendmail' cannot be installed; 'smmsp' is an unknown or invalid group. Anyway I think I made the fix and, but it will not let me re-run the update command: pfexec pkg image-update -v --be-name oi_151a Saying that oi_151a already exists. How do I remove the be environment so I can re-runt he command? pfexec beadm list if it is among the listed BEs: pfexec beadm destroy oi_151a Also you should look why you have not smmsp group on your system, did you remove it manually? I believe smmsp (25) is in group by default. Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] /etc/resolv.conf is always empty, after OS updates
Hi, are you using static configuration in nwam or dhcp? Best regards, Milan On 17.07.2012 13:01, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Please feel free to explain how to configure DNS servers into my NWAM config?? The docs for NWAM seem limited, to say the least. On 2012-07-17 02:51, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote: Message: 7 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:11:37 -0400 From: Richrerc...@acm.jhu.edu To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] /etc/resolv.conf is always empty after OSupdates Message-ID: CAOeNLuoWeS_qp3+VHLSf3-S31KAbABcnP5sCor0G9R33xqR=h...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If you don't specify DNS servers in your NWAM config, then yes, resolv.conf will blow away whenever nwam next reloads, I believe. I presume you have reason to believe you are? - Rich ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ACPI errors
Hi, I do not think Illumos contains some newer ACPI than OI 151a4 has and your system is on the latest release. Would it be possible to dump the tables with acpidump? I am busy with my work these days so I cannot look at it soon. Best regards, Milan Weiergräber, Oliver H. píše v ne 01. 07. 2012 v 18:06 +: Hi, given the information below, can you confirm that the ACPI code in current OpenIndiana is lagging behind that in the Illumos tree? If yes, could you please consider adopting the latest fixes to the OI kernel? Given that the same problem is also present in Solaris 11 (at least with my machine), having these updates would be a significant plus for OI ;-) Oliver From: Weiergräber, Oliver H. [o.h.weiergrae...@fz-juelich.de] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:11 PM To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ACPI errors Sure, here we go: (~): uname -a SunOS mymachine 5.11 oi_151a4 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris (~): pkg publisher PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI openindiana.org origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/dev/ opensolaris.org (non-sticky, disabled) origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/legacy/ sfe origin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/ sfe-encumberedorigin online http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe-encumbered/ Hope this helps, Oliver From: Milan Jurik [milan.ju...@xylab.cz] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:40 AM To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ACPI errors Hi, could you start system terminal and send output of: uname -a and pkg publisher to this list? Best regards, Milan On 25.06.2012 09:17, Weiergräber, Oliver H. wrote: Thanks a lot for the quick replies. According to Update manager, my system is up to date, so it seems the latest fixes you mentioned did not make it (yet) into OpenIndiana. Is there a chance this will happen in the neat future? Best regards, Oliver From: Yuri Pankov [yuri.pan...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 6:24 AM To: openindiana-discuss Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ACPI errors On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:39:00 -0400, Gordon Ross wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Weiergräber, Oliver H. o.h.weiergrae...@fz-juelich.de wrote: Hello, while testing OpenIndiana (and Solaris 11) on an HP xw8600 workstation, I noticed messages like this occurring regularly during bootup: May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 879926 kern.notice] ACPI Error: [CAPD] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20100915/dsfield-231) May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 10 kern.notice] May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 804433 kern.notice] Exception AE_ALREADY_EXISTS during execution of method [\_SB_.PCI0._OSC] (Node ff02d59a8e80) May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 10 kern.notice] May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 652514 kern.notice] Method Execution Stack: May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 489567 kern.notice] Method [_OSC] executing: CreateDWordField (CAPB, Local1, CAPD) [...] May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 342246 kern.notice] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0._OSC] (Node ff02d59a8e80), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20100915/psparse-632) May 17 21:13:48 mymachine.mydomain acpica: [ID 117524 kern.notice] ACPI: Marking method _OSC as Serialized because of AE_ALREADY_EXISTS error What kind of ACPI problem is indicated here? Anything to worry about? I did notice stability issues on Solaris 11, but not on OpenIndiana, so I guess these are unrelated to the ACPI stuff. The BIOS version is the latest available for this machine. Thanks in advance Oliver When I was last working on an ACPI update (which I think is what's currently in illumos and OI) Yuri Pankov was helping me test the code, and observed a problem on his HP laptop that looked something like this, if I recall correctly. He did some further experimenting and found that he could make his laptop boot without the ACPI errors by attaching the EC device a bit later. He showed me a possible fix, which I asked him to do some more work on, but then he ran out of time or something. Maybe you'd like to pick up his changes and try them? ACPICA 20100915 isn't the latest version available at the moment (at least in illumos tree), which means
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] VirtualBox in an IPS repo?
Hi, Jim Klimov píše v st 20. 06. 2012 v 19:22 +0400: Hello, I was asked why the OI repos don't provide VirtualBox? My first reply was that this may be because of PUEL license limitations; however, since release of the 4.x branch, the basic software and its source code are GPLv2, with only the Extended Pack being PUEL. Hence the question: it there anything (but lack of time and other resources) forbidding the IPS redistribution of VirtualBox? Can the original Oracle SVR4 package be repacked for IPS, or must that be a private rebuild? Finally, which repo would that best fit into (illumos-userland, SFE, etc.) if anyone were to do this quest? VBox team was delivering IPS package for some time. But their requirements for preinstall/postinstall were in collision with IPS team view. It is hard to judge who was/is right but generally, what is wrong with this SVR4 package (except autoupdate I would not recommend in case of VBox anyway)? As if the original SVR4 package can be repacked - you need to do more than just publish it as IPS, you have to deal with all work needed during install process. Also building VBox on Solaris was not simple task, not sure if it improved. Thanks for info, //Jim Klimov Best regards, Milan ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] libmtsk.so and Solaris Studio 12.3 with libsunperf
Hi Kostas, Kostas Oikonomou píše v po 04. 06. 2012 v 15:10 -0400: Hi Milan, That doesn't sound good. However, I found that Oracle bundles an up-to-date libmtsk.so with the Studio distribution for Linux: /opt/oracle/solarisstudio12.3/prod/lib/compilers/rtlibs/usr/lib/libmtsk.so.1 If they do that, cant' we get this for OI also? yes, they bundle it with Linux distro because they have no other options. But in case of Solaris they distribute libs directly with Solaris on the install media of Solaris 11 and these are not redistributable. Best regards, Milan Kostas Hi, no. It looks like Oracle moved libmtsk to system/library/openmp package with something called openmp.license. From the license only one header file is under BSD like license, the rest is owned by Oracle and not redistributable. So there is no legal way to publish newer libmtsk in OpenIndiana, only if somebody reimplements libmtsk :-( Best regards, Milan Kostas Oikonomou píše v pá 01. 06. 2012 v 11:12 -0400: Is there any chance of updating the /lib/libmtsk.so.1 and /lib/amd64/libmtsko.so.1 that come with OI 151a3 to version SUNWprivate_1.5? This version is required by Solaris (Oracle) Studio 12.3's libsunperf. Without this update, libsunperf is apparently not usable. You cannot get programs to compile because of Undefinedfirst referenced symbol in file __mt_static_for_loop /opt/solstudio/lib/amd64/libsunperf.so Kostas ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How do I get OpenIndana's make (not gmake) to accept the following
Hi Richard, Richard Sharpe píše v ne 03. 06. 2012 v 06:55 -0700: Hi folks, I have figured out part of my problem with the OpenIndiana machine on the Samba build farm. It seems that the system goes not have GNU make installed or the OpenIndiana version of make is first on the path. is gmake not installed? GNU make package with gmake 3.81 is developer/build/gnu-make Best regards, Milan We have the following in the Makefile: .SUFFIXES: .so .o.so: @echo Linking $ @$(CC) $(LDSHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $*.o -o $*.so and make is objecting with: Don't know how to make blah.so. Is there any way to work around this? ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
