Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] ZFS High-Availability and Sync Replication

2012-11-19 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 11/18/2012 08:32 PM, Richard Elling wrote: more below... On Nov 18, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/17/2012 03:03 AM, Richard Elling wrote: On Nov 15, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote: I've been lately looking around the

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] ZFS High-Availability and Sync Replication

2012-11-19 Thread Roel_D
http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-February/002451.html Are we reinventing the wheel? Kind regards, The out-side Op 19 nov. 2012 om 11:35 heeft Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: On 11/18/2012 08:32 PM, Richard Elling wrote: more

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] ZFS High-Availability and Sync Replication

2012-11-18 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 11/17/2012 03:03 AM, Richard Elling wrote: On Nov 15, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote: I've been lately looking around the net for high-availability and sync replication solutions for ZFS and came up pretty dry - seems like all the jazz is going around on

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] ZFS High-Availability and Sync Replication

2012-11-18 Thread Matt Clark
On 18 Nov 2012, at 11:13, Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote: I understand that replication at the storage level is the Wrong Way(tm) to do it, but I need to cover this scenario for the rare cases where the application layer can't/won't do it themselves. Most specifically, I need