On 19 November 2012 00:37, bscuk2 bsc...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone considered lightspark as a substitute for flash on Oi?
If we're looking at incomplete solutions, have you taken a look at:
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway
___
OpenIndiana-discuss
The latest Firerfox releases do play HTLM 5 format videos without the
need for flash perhaps an argument to keep updated on Firerfox.
On 19/11/2012 12:48, Jonathan Adams wrote:
we're looking at incomplete solutions, have you taken a look at:
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway
Message du 19/11/12 14:25
De : bscuk2
A : Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
The latest Firerfox releases do play HTLM 5 format videos without the
need for flash perhaps an argument to keep updated on Firerfox.
Yes
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, cpforum cpfo...@orange.fr wrote:
However today a browser without Flash has a broken leg.
I and a few hundred thousand Bloons players whole-heartedly agree. ;)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
/12 21:06
De : Gary
A : Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, cpforum wrote:
However today a browser without Flash has a broken leg.
I and a few hundred thousand Bloons players whole-heartedly
Message du 17/11/12 19:39
De : Bob Friesenhahn
A : Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Gary Driggs wrote:
I see this question asked regularly... Generally speaking, the vast
majority of browser
On 2012-11-18 18:00, cpforum wrote:
Firefox, Java and Thunderbird are very old releases. Gnome Desktop is not
maintened and applications like OpenOffice, Flash, Adobe Reader, etc. are 2 or
3 years old with a lot of known security holes.
Speaking of which: some of these projects are
Has anyone considered lightspark as a substitute for flash on Oi?
On 18/11/2012 18:19, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2012-11-18 18:00, cpforum wrote:
Firefox, Java and Thunderbird are very old releases. Gnome Desktop is
not maintened and applications like OpenOffice, Flash, Adobe Reader,
etc. are 2 or
Hello,
am I right thinking that the firefox version supplied with OI is the same as in
Solaris 11, and updated more or less regularly together with the remaining
userland?
Does this mean it is safe to use?
I generally don't care about new features in later firefox versions, as long as
security
I see this question asked regularly... Generally speaking, the vast
majority of browser exploits in the wild target windows browsers or
their plugins like Java, Adobe Reader Flash, or ActiveX. So even if
you're using one of those plugins with a Unix browser (of those
available), you're already
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Gary Driggs wrote:
I see this question asked regularly... Generally speaking, the vast
majority of browser exploits in the wild target windows browsers or
their plugins like Java, Adobe Reader Flash, or ActiveX. So even if
you're using one of those plugins with a Unix
On Nov 17, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
Even with x86 binary code, it is possible that the code may be able to
resolve and invoke a standard C library call (e.g. system()) in a way which
works on both Solaris and Linux.
I've not seen any code that
On Nov 17, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
Even with x86 binary code, it is possible that the code may be able to
resolve and invoke a standard C library call (e.g. system()) in a way which
works on both Solaris and Linux.
The JavaScript I've seen most
13 matches
Mail list logo
