: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Mail number: 16
Date: Tue, Nov 06, 2012
In reply to: Apostolos Syropoulos
MATE project could see in OI a choose for climb in the desktops
enviroment war. There is another Gnome fork named Cinammon (I guest)
Indeed and here's the link:
https
try it via
Mailing list, after pull Stefano to #openindiana
Cinnamon is from a to Linux Mint...
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Mail number: 16
Date: Tue, Nov 06, 2012
In reply to: Apostolos Syropoulos
MATE project could see in OI a choose for climb
/building:1.6
08:46stefano-k | http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.5/
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Mail number: 1
Date: Tue, Nov 06, 2012
In reply to: Apostolos Syropoulos
locale_t/newlocale()/uselocale() and the *_l() apis are hardly
Linuxize
Irek Szczesniak wrote:
Stubs won't be allowed, too. configure will just fail if they detect a
stub which still uses or relies on setlocale().
For what it's worth, the point of a stub would be to ignore attempts to
change locale, not to try to change the process-level locale on the fly.
--
: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Mail number: 13
Date: Mon, Nov 05, 2012
In reply to: Apostolos Syropoulos
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2012-November/msg2.html
The GNOME community today announced the EOL of their fallback mode,
These people have
locale_t/newlocale()/uselocale() and the *_l() apis are hardly
Linuxize your OS, they are POSIX.
I was not talking about these things but about the adoption of
things like udev.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
MATE project could see in OI a choose for climb in the desktops
enviroment war. There is another Gnome fork named Cinammon (I guest)
Indeed and here's the link:
https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
On 11/ 6/12 03:18 AM, låzaro wrote:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2012-November/msg2.html
The GNOME community today announced the EOL of their fallback mode,
On 11/ 6/12 08:23 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
MATE project could see in OI a choose for climb in the
On 11/ 1/12 02:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 11/ 1/12 02:20 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com
wrote:
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2012-November/msg2.html
The GNOME community today announced the EOL of their fallback mode,
These people have created a desktop for Linux and they do not care about
anything else. Unfortunately, this happens with many projects. So either
On 11/ 3/12 04:55 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
On út, 2012-10-30 at 13:27 -0400, låzaro wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos
asyropou...@yahoo.com wrote:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2012-November/msg2.html
The GNOME community today announced the EOL of their fallback mode,
These people have created a desktop for Linux and they do not
On 2012-11-01 18:18, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote:
I do not feel similarly :)
if it didn't feature a GUI we wouldn't notice or care.
I felt similarly for decades - on either linux or solaris, an X11
environment for me was just a way to:
1) Run many terminals instead of one in text mode,
2) Run
Hi,
On út, 2012-10-30 at 13:27 -0400, låzaro wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the step in the next
On 11/ 3/12 08:55 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
at fifth - Oracle team did some work on Gnome 3 on top of Solaris, they
have to publish it if they will distribute it. I am not saying I will
help with Gnome 3 on top of OI but somebody else could do that.
A bunch of that was already published in the
Hi,
On so, 2012-11-03 at 09:07 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 11/ 3/12 08:55 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
at fifth - Oracle team did some work on Gnome 3 on top of Solaris, they
have to publish it if they will distribute it. I am not saying I will
help with Gnome 3 on top of OI but somebody
. I would suggest it as and
avalaible package, just by traditions and memories. CDE is now free,
also could be use as light weight desktop solution.
good days or night...
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
Mail number: 26
Date: Thu, Nov 01, 2012
In reply to: Dmitry
Maybe I'm the oddball in the bunch. But I've been running OpenIndiana
as my desktop OS on my laptop at work since OI-147 was released two
years ago. Why?
I don't care about shiny new UI gloss, but I have to have a stable
system. What do I mean by that? One that can run stably without
rebooting
On 11/ 1/12 03:56 PM, Ron Parker wrote:
Maybe I'm the oddball in the bunch. But I've been running OpenIndiana
as my desktop OS on my laptop at work since OI-147 was released two
years ago.
...
There is no reason OI could not make a good
working desktop. It's been fine for my needs for two
+1. There are alot of very useful desktop operating systems already,
so i see no point in OI trying to compete with them. In business
This way of thinking is responsible for what happened to Solaris.
No OI should be a server and a desktop system. Otherwise, OI will
die pretty soon.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
Gnome 2 is perfect (apart from a few annoying bugs), Gnome3/Unity
would be a drawback indeed, and nobody here wants to go back to
such basic stuff as xfce and other incapable desktop systems (KDE
may would be an option). As long as gtk3
I do not feel similarly :)
if it didn't feature a GUI we wouldn't notice or care.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Yet I remember OpenWindows... Quite distinctive.
WindowMaker sounds good. Used it for a while a few years ago. Been thinking
about looking at it again. :)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com wrote:
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ...
The problem with Gnome 3 is
On 11/ 1/12 02:20 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com wrote:
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the step in the next time. That project look like very good with a
lot of good
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ...
We don't have time or resources to support a Gnome 2 desktop system
development fork (at least I don't and I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:27 PM, låzaro netad...@lex-sa.cu wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the step
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:27:59 -0400, låzaro netad...@lex-sa.cu wrote:
Hi all, as many people don't wanna see, gnome future is like a submarine
without roof. So, my question. What about make the new gnome's fork as
default desktop enviroment, just like is making linux mint. OI always
have the
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:35:02 +
From: t12nsloo...@gmail.com
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future
from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies
Mate is a fork of Gnome 2 that already has a community behind it. Mint
features Mate as a key desktop choice.
http://mate-desktop.org/
except that Mate looks nothing like Gnome 2 ... so if the idea is to
keep the look and feel of the current environment then Mate is not the
way to go.
We'd
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop
and most developed environment which is accepted by the current or
potential user base.It would not be the correct choice
going with a project which either peters out or is not accepted by
commercial users as this would
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:25:13 +, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
As an Enterprise system the commercial view should prevail?
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
___
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:25 AM, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop and
most developed environment which is accepted by the current or potential
user base.It would not be the correct choice
going with a project which
On 1 November 2012 02:33, mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
+1. There are alot of very useful desktop operating systems already,
so i see no point in OI trying to compete with them. In business
speak OI
So why OI has DE at all? Leading to your logic community has to cut off
DE from distribution at all... And what we will have? Another one
illumos based server distribution?!
I see OI as OS for general purposes, so stopping development in DE will
decrease value of OI. Yes, community is to
I never suggested stopping DE development. I merely suggested that thinking of
OI as an enterprise desktop OS is trying to sell an idea that enterprises
aren't going to buy. I'm actually going to switch from Mac to OI laptop after
the holidays (getting crazier with age).
Sent from my
A GUI is only needed when you want to use the gui
I see more benefit in better webmin-support for zfs, mysql and other
serversoftware.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 31 okt. 2012 om 23:30 heeft Julius Roberts hooliowobb...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On 1 November 2012 02:33,
On 1 November 2012 09:48, Maxim Kondratovich maxim@gmail.com wrote:
So why OI has DE at all? Leading to your logic community has to cut off DE
from distribution at all... And what we will have? Another one illumos based
server distribution?!
The community will do whatever the community
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:25:13 +, openbabel openba...@gmail.com wrote:
As an Enterprise system the commercial view should prevail?
This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
desktop operating system.
I would take
webmin?
Ick. Swapping a desktop gui for a web gui...still get a gui.
So just offshore the gui problem eh?
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 06:55 AM, Roel_D wrote:
A GUI is only needed when you want to use the gui
I see more benefit in better webmin-support for zfs, mysql and other
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:01 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:25 AM, openbabelopenba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am of a commercial view. I am interested in the most popular desktop and
most developed environment which is accepted by the current or potential
user base.It
WindowMaker sounds good. Used it for a while a few years ago. Been thinking
about looking at it again. :)
--
Sent from my Jelly Bean Galaxy Nexus
Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:01 AM, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at
I used WindowMaker for a couple years myself. It is an easy compile on
*Solaris and works well. At least it compiled easy for me.
I ultimately went back to OpenWindows. I own a large stock of Solaris
8 media, so I will never be without my OpenWindows packages.
Jerry Kemp
On 10/31/12 08:18
44 matches
Mail list logo
