...I read again the WayIn post, don't know if you can read it without being
registered:
http://www.wayin.com/#!/games/727ef756-1a8a-48f5-82c9-0e3c10b077d6
well, these are few words by Scott McNealy:
Solaris is not on Intel, so if Sparc goes, Solaris suffers too
What do you read??
http://www.wayin.com/#!/games/727ef756-1a8a-48f5-82c9-0e3c10b077d6
well, these are few words by Scott McNealy: Solaris is not on
Intel, so if Sparc goes, Solaris suffers too
What do you read??
Sorry Gabriele, please do not be angry at me, but this is just
confused gibberish to me.
I
So many pure SUN/Solaris/OpeninIndiana professionals and one rumour puts us
back to The Sun gossip. ;-)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 01/ 7/12 10:46 AM, Open Indiana wrote:
So many pure SUN/Solaris/OpeninIndiana professionals and one rumour puts us
back to The Sun gossip. ;-)
Its not rumor actually.
It does not mean what it is said (x86 kill) but it is close enough,
regarding Openindiana.
I don't care if our commodity
On Jan 7, 2012, Nikola M. wrote:
It means Oracle not willing to make x86 hardware to run non-Oracle software
on it.
Then why did they send me a Windows driver disc with the X4170 M2 we
bought last year? Maybe it's explained somewhere in their Windows 2008
Server install guide for the same
On 01/ 7/12 12:22 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012, Nikola M. wrote:
It means Oracle not willing to make x86 hardware to run non-Oracle software on
it.
Then why did they send me a Windows driver disc with the X4170 M2 we
bought last year? Maybe it's explained somewhere in their Windows
On Jan 7, 2012, at 4:42 AM, Andrew McRae wrote:
If you read the whole statement, and its context, rather than just pulling
out a few words like this, then it's clear that what he means is if SPARC
was cancelled, then Oracle would not control the CPU that their OS (Solaris)
runs on, and
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On 6/01/12 10:22 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
2003 called, they want their conspiracy theory back.
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer, system admin and troubleshooter
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
What's the source of this rumor?
--
Finid
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On 01/06/2012 01:22 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Sources please, because from where I'm standing, it looks like you're
just making this stuff up.
Cheers,
--
Saso
On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
What's the source of this rumor?
And moreover, how would anyone here know if such a rumor were true? This is not
an Oracle-sponsored project.
Also,
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
No. Oracle makes lots of money selling Exadata storage appliance
systems running Solaris on x64 hardware.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
This has been a rumor since acquisition of sun... i wouldn't worry about
it. i would guess that in the highest rooms of the oracle building all
ideas have gone across the table.
lk
On 1/6/12 6:22 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of
Sorry mate,
but i think this is pure nonsense and fud too.
Who told you this?
Would be quit interesting to know about the source.
Why should Oracle do this?
To sell more Sparc Systems?
Nobody of the Customer Base will buy more Sparc Systems in case of EOL'd
x86 Solaris
Cheers
Bernd
On
Please note that although we all thought it was FUD; Alan Coopersmith
(notice his email address) who works for Oracle (but still thankfully
watches these forums) has already responded to this in the negative,
and hasn't included any of the usual caveats about it being a
different department.
I
On 01/06/12 09:23, Jonathan Adams wrote:
Please note that although we all thought it was FUD; Alan Coopersmith
(notice his email address) who works for Oracle
But as I note here every few months, please remember I am not an authorized
Oracle spokesman, and what I say is not an ironclad
From Solaris 11 releases notes : Solaris 11 no longer support x86 (32 bit) but
support x64 (64 bit Intel).
Message du 06/01/12 18:31
De : Alan Coopersmith
A : Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oracle Solaris on x86 going to be killed?
On 01
On 01/06/2012 07:22 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
They did say they'd get rid of the 32-bit versions of Solaris, so that's
probably what you're referring to, as well as remove support for older
SPARCs, which
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On 1/6/12 4:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 01/06/12 04:22, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I heard rumors of Oracle going to dismiss the intel version of
Solaris...
Is this true?!
Inviato da iPad
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one would loose any
server if Orcale goes nuts and kills architectures... That would be a very
important task.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Shain Singh
Goes nuts? That would imply that the starting point wasn't currently
nuts wouldn't it? ;-)
On 1/6/12 4:37 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz gabriel.delac...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one
On 01/ 7/12 01:37 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
bittorrent, we could make S11 upgreadable to OI, so no one would loose any
server if Orcale goes nuts and kills architectures... That would be a very
important task.
Ok, the sources were voices from some Oracle Italy guy who told a friend of
mine that the higher plans of Oracle were to kill Oracle Intel in a couple of
years and stick to just sparc...
I didn't believe that, but was still guessing if there may be any hidden truth
leading somwhere.
I also
On Jan 6, 2012, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
Well, if someone would make use of those files that Oracle shared in
BitTorrent
1. It's not a legit release and therefore a legal grey area
2. We don't know who released it but either way see #1
3. It's most likely that Solaris 11 changes are spread
26 matches
Mail list logo
