On Fri, 2 Jan 2015, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm pretty sure it would be faster over ssh but haven't tried that
yet.
Is this really abnormal? Can any of you give some idea what I should
be expecting here?
It is normal. NFS writes are synchronous writes. Unless your server
has special
If you're using rsync between computers over an existing secure link, then
don't bother with the ssh overhead and set up an rsync-daemon and you'll
get a much faster speed (and if you have riverbeds you even get
optimisation)
Jon
On 3 January 2015 at 16:21, Bob Friesenhahn
oops, you're Writing to the share, not reading from it; pls disregard and
sorry for the misread.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
wrote:
is it mounted with noatime? Updating access time for every file being
read over nfs sometimes results in massive
is it mounted with noatime? Updating access time for every file being read
over nfs sometimes results in massive slowdown. An nfs rsync of millions
of tiny files would exhibit this pathology.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Server setup: oi build 151_a9
Server setup: oi build 151_a9
zfs filesystem with nfs and root rw enabled on share.
zfs get sharenfs p0/rrsnap/gv
NAME PROPERTY VALUESOURCE
p0/rrsnap/gv sharenfs rw=@192.168.0.0/24,root=@192.168.0.0/24 inherited from
p0/rrsnap
---
Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com writes:
is it mounted with noatime? Updating access time for every file being read
over nfs sometimes results in massive slowdown. An nfs rsync of millions
of tiny files would exhibit this pathology.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry Jacob I didn't see your correction before replying
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
