On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:42:00PM +0100, Christian Theune via
Openipmi-developer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ouch, sorry to hear that. I’ll test it with that patch and will ask for a
> backport to 5.10 after that. Is that something you’d do or should I contact
> the maintainers?
I've already requested
Hi,
ouch, sorry to hear that. I’ll test it with that patch and will ask for a
backport to 5.10 after that. Is that something you’d do or should I contact the
maintainers?
Christian
> On 14. Mar 2023, at 18:29, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
> Well, dang, I had already fixed this a year and a half
Well, dang, I had already fixed this a year and a half ago. I wish I
had a better memory.
Anyway, the fix is commit db05ddf7f321634c5659a0cf7ea56594e22365f7
("ipmi:watchdog: Set panic count to proper value on a panic") in
mainstream 5.16. I'm attaching that patch.
-corey
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, at 15:17, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config TTY_PRINTK_LEVEL
>> config PRINTER
>> tristate "Parallel printer support"
>> depends on PARPORT
>> + depends on HAS_IOPORT
>
>
Awesome!
> On 14. Mar 2023, at 15:54, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Christian Theune via
> Openipmi-developer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry, I didn’t expect you to make me a branch. I had already taken your
>> diff over to 5.10 as it applied cleanly … sorry
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Christian Theune via
Openipmi-developer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, I didn’t expect you to make me a branch. I had already taken your diff
> over to 5.10 as it applied cleanly … sorry for the additional work and thanks
> anyways.
Ok, that's great. It's
Hi,
sorry, I didn’t expect you to make me a branch. I had already taken your diff
over to 5.10 as it applied cleanly … sorry for the additional work and thanks
anyways.
Here’s the output:
[ 6521.905890] sysrq: Trigger a crash
[ 6521.909294] Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash
[
Hi Niklas,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:12 PM Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add this dependency and ifdef
> sections of code using inb()/outb() as alternative access methods.
>
> Co-developed-by:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:11:41PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add this dependency and ifdef
> sections of code using inb()/outb() as alternative access methods.
>
> Co-developed-by:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, at 13:20, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:11:41PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
>
> Who should pick this?
All patches in this series depend on patch 1, so either I merge
them all through the asm-generic tree, or I ask
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:11:41PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add this dependency and ifdef
> sections of code using inb()/outb() as alternative access methods.
For the IPMI portions,
In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
not being declared. We thus need to add this dependency and ifdef
sections of code using inb()/outb() as alternative access methods.
Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle
---
drivers/char/Kconfig
12 matches
Mail list logo
