On 03/04/2024 10:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> When building with CONFIG_OF and/or CONFIG_ACPI disabled but W=1 extra
> warnings enabled, a lot of driver cause a warning about an unused
> ID table:
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c:356:34: error: unused variable
>
Cleanup bindings dropping unneeded quotes. Once all these are fixed,
checking for this can be enabled in yamllint.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
.../devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 08/08/2022 15:26, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 11:11:16AM +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/08/2022 09:54, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> Add to npcm845 KCS compatible string a fallback to npcm750 KCS compatible
>>> string becuase NPCM845 and NPCM7
gned-off-by: Tomer Maimon
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
___
Openipmi-developer mailing list
Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
On 07/08/2022 09:51, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 09:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/08/2022 20:18, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> Add to npcm845 KCS compatible string a fallback to np
On 07/08/2022 18:05, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> We had a disscation with Arnd, Arnd asked us to use a fallback as we
>> did here if NPCM8XX device module is similar to NPCM7XX module:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220522155046.260146-5-tmaimo...@gmail.com/
>>
>> I think we should use a fallback
On 07/08/2022 16:54, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 15:11, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:03:56AM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> Hi Corey,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your comment.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 14:58, Corey Minyard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022
On 07/08/2022 14:11, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:03:56AM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>> Hi Corey,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment.
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 14:58, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:18:00PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
Add to npcm845
On 05/08/2022 13:58, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:18:00PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>> Add to npcm845 KCS compatible string a fallback to npcm750 KCS compatible
>> string becuase NPCM845 and NPCM750 BMCs are using identical KCS modules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon
>>
On 04/08/2022 20:18, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Add to npcm845 KCS compatible string a fallback to npcm750 KCS compatible
> string becuase NPCM845 and NPCM750 BMCs are using identical KCS modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon
Your previous commit adding that compatible was simply wrong and not
On 04/08/2022 16:55, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Add to npcm845 KCS compatible string a fallback to npcm750 KCS compatible
> string.
It's easily visible in the code what you are doing, so instead you must
explain why you are doing it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 17/07/2022 14:11, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Add a compatible string for Nuvoton BMC NPCM845 KCS and modify NPCM KCS
> description to support all NPCM BMC SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regard
On 22/04/2022 06:16, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> Added Krzysztof Kozlowski
> as I'm not aware of the email change
The email change from @canonical.com was 1.5 months ago, so it would be
better if rebase your changes on more recent Linux kernel. You get all
proper .mailmap entries.
Best r
On 03/02/2022 18:07, Verdun, Jean-Marie wrote:
>
>> Maybe it does not look like, but this is actually a v2. Nick was asked
>> to change the naming for the nodes already in v1. Unfortunately it did
>> not happen, so we have vuart, spifi, vic and more.
>
>> It is a waste of
On 02/02/2022 17:52, nick.hawk...@hpe.com wrote:
> From: Nick Hawkins
>
> GXP is the name of the HPE SoC.
> This SoC is used to implement BMC features of HPE servers
> (all ProLiant, Synergy, and many Apollo, and Superdome machines)
> It does support many features including:
> ARMv7
On 03/02/2022 15:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:55 AM wrote:
>>
>> From: Nick Hawkins
>>
(...)
>> +
>> + vuart_a: vuart_a@80fd0200 {
>
> serial@...
Maybe it does not look like, but this is actually a v2. Nick was asked
to change the naming for the nodes already in
i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
will set it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
---
The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
---
drivers/cha
i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
will set it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com
---
The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
---
drivers/char/ipmi
was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
char: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 1 -
drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c | 1 -
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c| 1
19 matches
Mail list logo
