On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:06:03PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
This patch looks good to me. I added the following as a header.
Is this ok? The Signed-off-by line is pretty important in patches.
Thanks,
-Corey
--
This patch adds the ability to register for a command per-channel in
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:37:36AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Barksdale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds the ability to register for a command per-channel.
If your BMC supports multiple channels, incoming messages can be
differentiated by the
This patch looks good to me. I added the following as a header.
Is this ok? The Signed-off-by line is pretty important in patches.
Thanks,
-Corey
--
This patch adds the ability to register for a command per-channel in
the IPMI driver.
If your BMC supports multiple channels, incoming messages
From: David Barksdale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds the ability to register for a command per-channel.
If your BMC supports multiple channels, incoming messages can be
differentiated by the channel on which they arrived. In this case it's
useful to have the ability to register to receive
From: David Barksdale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds the ability to register for a command per-channel.
If your BMC supports multiple channels, incoming messages can be
differentiated by the channel on which they arrived. In this case it's
useful to have the ability to register to receive
