Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 1/3] ipmi/bt-bmc: change compatible node to 'aspeed, ast2400-ibt-bmc'

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:15:57 PM CET Corey Minyard wrote: > On 11/08/2016 09:52 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > O > snip > > While we're modifying the binding, should we add a compat string for > the ast2500? > >>> Well, if the change in this patch is fine for all, may be we can

Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 1/3] ipmi/bt-bmc: change compatible node to 'aspeed, ast2400-ibt-bmc'

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:28:01 PM CET Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 11/02/2016 02:56 PM, Joel Stanley wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Wednesday 02 November 2016, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > >>> The Aspeed SoCs have two BT interfaces :

Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 1/3] ipmi/bt-bmc: change compatible node to 'aspeed, ast2400-ibt-bmc'

On Wednesday 02 November 2016, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > The Aspeed SoCs have two BT interfaces : one is IPMI compliant and the > other is H8S/2168 compliant. > > The current ipmi/bt-bmc driver implements the IPMI version and we > should reflect its nature in the compatible node name using >

[Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 1/3] ipmi/bt-bmc: change compatible node to 'aspeed, ast2400-ibt-bmc'

The Aspeed SoCs have two BT interfaces : one is IPMI compliant and the other is H8S/2168 compliant. The current ipmi/bt-bmc driver implements the IPMI version and we should reflect its nature in the compatible node name using 'aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc' instead of 'aspeed,ast2400-bt-bmc'. The latter