[Openjdk] Bug#900912: openjdk-10: Accessibility does not get loaded

On 13.07.2018 12:39, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Matthias Klose, le ven. 13 juil. 2018 12:04:42 +0200, a ecrit: this issue now has two patches, one to install the properties file, and the other to extend the class path. Are both needed? Yes. Can you see any compatibility issues when

Re: [Openjdk] [Bug 1778479] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 package post-installation script subpr

On 25.06.2018 12:12, Logan wrote: > Sorry may be not clear about what I'm looking for. I know MY actual > slave list but wanted to find the ones expected by openjdk package. manual pages only. see the maintainer scripts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,

Re: [Openjdk] [Bug 1778479] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 package post-installation script subpr

On 25.06.2018 11:29, Logan wrote: > Is there a way (may be sourcecode) to find alternative slave list ? So I > can clean my installation ? search for the java alternative, which maybe is the master? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed

[Openjdk] [Bug 1778479] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 package post-installation script subproces

rmid was never packaged as a slave for an alternative. You installed packges from another source. Not a problem with our openjdk packages. package:openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64:8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Setting up openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 (10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1) ... update-alternatives:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1739631] Re: Fresh install with JDK 9 can't use the generated PKCS12 cacerts keystore file

** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739631 Title:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1735482] Re: OpenJDK JRE should be ported to GTK3

also done for openjdk-11, but now only available in the openjdk-r/ppa PPA ** Changed in: openjdk-11 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1735482] Re: OpenJDK JRE should be ported to GTK3

fixed in 10 in 18.04 ** Changed in: openjdk-10 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735482 Title: OpenJDK JRE should be ported

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-10 10~46-4 (source) into unstable

Architecture: source Version: 10~46-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-10-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-10-demo - Java runtime base

[Openjdk] [Bug 1735482] Re: OpenJDK JRE should be ported to GTK3

fixed in 18.04 ** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Assignee: Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-7 7u171-2.6.13-1 (source) into experimental

Architecture: source Version: 7u171-2.6.13-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: high Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: icedtea-7-jre-jamvm - Alternative JVM for OpenJDK, using JamVM openjdk-7-dbg - Java r

[Openjdk] [Bug 1735482] Re: OpenJDK JRE should be ported to GTK3

openjdk-9 source removed from bionic ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735482 Title: OpenJDK JRE should be

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-9 9.0.4+12-4 (source) into unstable

: source Version: 9.0.4+12-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-9-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-9-demo - Java runtime based on Op

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-10 10~46-3 (source) into unstable

Architecture: source Version: 10~46-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-10-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-10-demo - Java runtime base

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-9 9.0.4+12-3 (source) into unstable

: source Version: 9.0.4+12-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-9-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-9-demo - Java runtime based on Op

[Openjdk] [Bug 1754276] Re: Update openjdk 9 to 9.0.4

** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754276 Title: Update openjdk 9 to 9.0.4 Status in openjdk-9 package in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1735482] Re: OpenJDK JRE should be ported to GTK3

** Also affects: openjdk-11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =>

[Openjdk] [Bug 1738579] Re: package openjdk-10-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_openjdk-9.py', which is also in packa

fixed in 11 as well ** Changed in: openjdk-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738579 Title: package openjdk-10-jre-headless (not

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-11 11~5-1 (source) into unstable

Architecture: source Version: 11~5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-11-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-11-demo - Java runtime base

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-9 9.0.4+12-2 (source) into unstable

: source Version: 9.0.4+12-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-9-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-9-demo - Java runtime based on Op

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-9 9.0.4+12-1 (source) into unstable

: source Version: 9.0.4+12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-9-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-9-demo - Java runtime based on Op

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-8 8u162-b12-1 (source) into unstable

: source Version: 8u162-b12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-8-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-8-demo - Java runtime based on Op

[Openjdk] Bug#877853: Closing issue reported for backport version, no information in the report

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Closing issue reported for backport version, no information at all in the report. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Openjdk] [Bug 1738579] Re: package openjdk-10-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_openjdk-9.py', which is also in packa

** Also affects: openjdk-11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-10 10~46-2 (source) into unstable

Architecture: source Version: 10~46-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-10-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-10-demo - Java runtime base

[Openjdk] Accepted openjdk-10 10~46-1 (source) into unstable

Architecture: source Version: 10~46-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net> Changed-By: Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Description: openjdk-10-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-10-demo - Java runtime base

[Openjdk] Bug#891573: Bug#891573: Bug#891573: openjdk-10: builds with unlimited 'make -j'

On 14.03.2018 18:29, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On 26.02.2018 19:56, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Source: openjdk-10 >> Version: 10~32-1 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: make build machine unusable while building >> >

[Openjdk] Bug#891573: Bug#891573: openjdk-10: builds with unlimited 'make -j'

Control: severity -1 important On 26.02.2018 19:56, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source: openjdk-10 > Version: 10~32-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: make build machine unusable while building > > Hi, > > I just stumbled upon load 425 while rebuilding openjdk-10 in > experimental ... the

[Openjdk] Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available

Control: severity -1 wishlist On 04.10.2017 11:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Control: reassign -1 openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1 > Control: severity -1 serious no. why? Please don't exaggerate bug severities without looking at them. > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:47:12PM +0200, Olliver

[Openjdk] [Bug 1713043] Re: openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install

fixed in -4 ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713043 Title: openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't

[Openjdk] [Bug 1548434] Re: jmap -heap broken since update to 7u95-2.6.4-0ubuntu0.14.04.1

Andrew, can jmap work with the detached debug info? Even looking at the redhat report it looks like the issue is not solved this way. Could you clarify "the symbols we need"? I'm currently stripping with --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note --strip-debug, so this might be too much.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1665736] Re: unstable packages installed without warning

the openjdk-9 packages now have the status of a release candidate in 17.10. No need to remove them. If packages pull in openjdk-9 by default, then they have wrong dependencies. You should file bug reports for these packages to get the dependencies fixed. ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu)

[Openjdk] Bug#871009: Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff

On 06.08.2017 11:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 08/06/2017 05:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I am currently testing the updated patch on armel, armhf and >> m68k. If it succeeds, it should be included for the next upload >> and the workaround for m68k from #868255 [1]. > >

[Openjdk] [Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8

this has nothing to do with the LTS. It's a PPA. ** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] Bug#863199: error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp

If I remember correctly this has to do with update-alternatives not considering anything outside of /usr/share/man ... but my memory might be wrong. Is your configuration not installing man pages by default? Does installation of man-db help? ___

[Openjdk] Bug#863888: issue in backport package

Control: severity -1 normal this is apparently an issue in the backports archive. Please contact the uploader for this package for a fix. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Openjdk] Bug#864288: openjdk-9: Please obsolete patch 8073754-stack-overflow-9-build.diff

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The patch was introduced to build zero on ppc64el. Does zero still build with this patch disabled? Matthias ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Openjdk] [g...@libero.it: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3858-1] openjdk-7 security update]

On 19.05.2017 14:51, g...@libero.it wrote: > Forgot to address the OpenJDK team. > best regards, > g. > > - Forwarded message from g...@libero.it - > > Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 23:29:44 +0200 > From: g...@libero.it > To: Moritz Muehlenhoff > Subject: Re: [SECURITY]

[Openjdk] [Bug 1584118] Re: 16.04 incorrectly installs openjdk-9 to satisfy java8-runtime dependency

closing this issue. you should always have a dependency on a real package first, not just depending on a virtual package. ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to

[Openjdk] Bug#850899: openjdk-9 should not yet enter testing (snapshot only)

Package: src:openjdk-9 Version: 9~b151-1 Severity: serious openjdk-9 should not yet enter testing (snapshot only). ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk

[Openjdk] [Bug 1640845] Re: Strip -O3 from hotspot and jdk build flags

** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640845 Title: Strip -O3 from hotspot and jdk build flags Status in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

could these be proposed for an upstream backport? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation Status

[Openjdk] [Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

would it be possible to propose this patch upstream for backporting to jdk8u? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to

[Openjdk] Bug#841173: openjdk-9: FTBFS on mips*

Please can you forward the issue upstream? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openjdk] Bug#840401: Bug#840401: openjdk-8-jdk: Compiler crashes the JVM on mipsel during libguestfs build

Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 + help please ask the mips porters for help, or ask for the removal of the package. Cheers, Matthias On 11.10.2016 11:11, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Package: openjdk-8-jdk > Version: 8u102-b14.1-2 > Severity: grave > > Dear Maintainer, > > I just got a

[Openjdk] Bug#832489: tzdata-java: The Debian 8 package tzdata-java without support openjdk8

Control: reassign -1 src:tzdata openjdk-8 now ships it's own timezone data base, which cannot be derived from tzdata unfortunately. The tzdata-java packages need to be removed. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to :

[Openjdk] [Bug 1573913] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 正要取代 '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h'，它也是套件 openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b114-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1573745] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: попытка перезаписать «/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h», который уже имеется в пак

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1573406] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di "/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h" presente anche nel pa

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1573731] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 removed openJDK-7 from repositories

won't fix. you'll find an openjdk-7 package in the openjdk-r/ppa PPA. There is no intent to update this package. ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-7 in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1567077] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/bin/jstatd', which is also in package openj

fixed in 9~b114. ** Changed in: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567077 Title: package openjdk-9-jdk-headless

[Openjdk] [Bug 1572797] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 正要取代 '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h'，它也是套件 openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b114-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1551532] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in JNU_GetEnv()

** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551532 Title: java crashed with SIGABRT in JNU_GetEnv() Status in openjdk-9 package in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1572185] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 正试图覆盖 /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h，它同时被包含于软件包 openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1559689] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Pake

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1565270] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: zkouším přepsat soubor „/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h“, který je také v balíku

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1571435] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package op

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] Bug#821858: Bug#821858: openjdk-7-jre-headless: postinst turns /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/zi into a dangling symlink

Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 + wontfix the package is being removed in unstable. It's kept in experimental only, to prepare and test security releases. These security release don't need this fix, and dpkg-maintscript-helper can't be used because it's not available in

[Openjdk] Bug#794502: Bug#794502: please fix the dangling symlink, adeqaute found the same.

On 20.04.2016 21:59, shirish शिरीष wrote: Hi all, I was going to open a new bug-report but thankfully found this one. I saw the same thing, although with help of adequate. [$] adequate openjdk-8-jdk-headless openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64: broken-symlink

[Openjdk] [Bug 1501369] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.

please recheck with 16.04 LTS; if the problem persists, please report the issue where you downloaded the application ** Package changed: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Openjdk] [Bug 1505132] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT

please recheck with 16.04 LTS ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505132 Title: java crashed with

[Openjdk] [Bug 1559684] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in _XimServerDestroy()

** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559684 Title: java crashed with SIGABRT in _XimServerDestroy() Status

[Openjdk] [Bug 1559684] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in _XimServerDestroy()

no reproducer given, the loaded ums.jar is not part of the archive ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1544886] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179: dequeue_pending_request: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_unknown_req_in_deq' failed.

unreproducible, kmttg.jar is not part of the archive ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to

[Openjdk] [Bug 1544095] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179: dequeue_pending_request: Zusicherung »!xcb_xlib_unknown_req_in_deq« nicht erfüllt.

involves localally installed libraries. Please report the problem where you downloaded these. LocalLibraries: /tmp/libgdxrobin/31ce78a2/libopenal64.so /tmp/libgdxrobin/31ce78a2/liblwjgl64.so /tmp/libgdxrobin/6ef2d459/libgdx64.so ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid

[Openjdk] [Bug 1565287] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in XQueryExtension() [SweetHome3d- App]

unreproducible ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Package changed: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) => sweethome3d (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: sweethome3d (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed

[Openjdk] [Bug 1520743] Re: Netbeans 8.1 installer freezes running over openjdk-8

this is now turned off by default ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1520743 Title: Netbeans 8.1

[Openjdk] [Bug 1510009] Re: Java 1.8.0_66 is extremely deadlock prone regarding AWT/GTK interaction

now turned off by default in 16.04 ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510009 Title: Java 1.8.0_66

[Openjdk] [Bug 1502271] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u45-b14-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

nothing to do with openjdk-8 Setting up oracle-java8-installer (8u60+8u60arm-1~webupd8~1) ... Installing from local file /var/cache/oracle-jdk8-installer/jdk-8u60-linux-x64.tar.gz Removing outdated cached downloads... update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for java update-alternatives:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1530576] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u66-b01-5 failed to install/upgrade: Auf das Archiv kann nicht zugegriffen werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden

I don't see anything openjdk-8 related in the logs ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530576 Title: package

[Openjdk] [Bug 1552500] Re: No properties installed in /etc/java-8-openjdk/

icedtea-8-plugin is in the archive, but moved to universe. ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552500

[Openjdk] [Bug 1550244] Re: Wrong version set in latest openjdk-8 builds

fixed for 16-04 LTS, no intent to fix for earlier releases ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550244

[Openjdk] Bug#760301: Bug#760301: openjdk-8: Missing links to jawt_md.h and jni_md.h in /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/include

On 17.03.2016 09:48, Hilko Bengen wrote: I have just been bitten by this while trying to build software that uses JNI that involves calling gcc with -I${JAVA_HOME}/include . Additionally passing -I${JAVA_HOME}/include/linux to gcc seems to work around the problem in my Linux-specific case, but

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: openjdk-7 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial amd64 icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial armhf icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial i386

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: openjdk-7 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial amd64 icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial armhf icedtea-7-jre-jamvm 7u95-2.6.4-3 in xenial i386

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: azureus 4.3.0.6-5 in xenial azureus 4.3.0.6-5 in xenial amd64 azureus 4.3.0.6-5 in xenial arm64 azureus 4.3.0.6-5 in xenial armhf azureus 4.3.0.6-5 in xenial i386 azureus

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: radare2-bindings 0.9.6-4 in xenial python-radare2 0.9.6-4 in xenial amd64 python-radare2 0.9.6-4 in xenial arm64 python-radare2 0.9.6-4 in xenial armhf python-radare2 0.9.6-4 in xenial i386

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: avian 1.1.0-4 in xenial jvm-7-avian-jre 1.1.0-4 in xenial amd64 jvm-7-avian-jre 1.1.0-4 in xenial armhf jvm-7-avian-jre 1.1.0-4 in xenial i386 Comment: lp: #1563986, openjdk-7 removal 1 package successfully

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] [NEW] openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Public bug reported: openjdk-7 should be removed from 16.04 LTS, and only openjdk-8 should be shipped. ** Affects: avian (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563986] Re: openjdk-7 removal for 16.04 LTS

Removing packages from xenial: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm 7u79-3 in xenial openjdk-7-jre-dcevm 7u79-3 in xenial amd64 openjdk-7-jre-dcevm 7u79-3 in xenial i386 Comment: lp: #1563986, openjdk-7 removal 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563578] Re: remove openjdk-6, superseded by 7 and 8

** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563578 Title: remove openjdk-6, superseded by 7 and 8 Status in jai-core package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed

[Openjdk] [Bug 1560405] Re: FFe: Sync ca-certificates-java 20160321 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

openjdk-6 removed and ca-certificates-java synced ** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563578] Re: remove openjdk-6, superseded by 7 and 8

openjdk-6 removed ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563578 Title: remove openjdk-6, superseded by 7 and 8

[Openjdk] [Bug 1563578] Re: remove openjdk-6, superseded by 7 and 8

Demoting packages to xenial-proposed: jai-core 1.1.4-3ubuntu1 in xenial Comment: lp: #1563578, openjdk-6 removal 1 package successfully demoted. ** Changed in: jai-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: jai-core (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix

[Openjdk] [Bug 1560405] Re: FFe: Sync ca-certificates-java 20160321 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

yes, openjdk-6 needs to go away, and better openjdk-7 as well ** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] Bug#815885: openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el

Control: tags -1 + pending On 25.02.2016 16:23, Aurelien Jarno wrote: tag 815855 + patch thanks applied for -4 (-3 is currently in NEW). ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Openjdk] Bug#815885: openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el

On 25.02.2016 16:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2016-02-25 11:58, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch moreinfo According to the build logs, openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p

[Openjdk] Bug#815885: openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el

On 25.02.2016 14:11, James Cowgill wrote: On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:58 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch moreinfo According to the build logs, openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status

[Openjdk] Bug#815885: openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el

Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch moreinfo According to the build logs, openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-8 I'm thinking to just disable openjdk builds on the mips* platforms. The feedback

[Openjdk] [Bug 1517609] Re: Openjdk8 still has failing tests on ppc64el

both patches in comments #1 and #2 don't apply, other patches need back porting. ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1520743] Re: Netbeans 8.1 installer freezes running over openjdk-8

please can you recheck the behavior in 16.04 LTS without the change in comment #2? ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1544095] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179: dequeue_pending_request: Zusicherung »!xcb_xlib_unknown_req_in_deq« nicht erfüllt.

** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544095 Title: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1501369] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.

** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1501369 Title: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1505132] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT

** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505132 Title: java crashed with SIGABRT Status in openjdk-8 package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Openjdk] [Bug 1510009] Re: Java 1.8.0_66 is extremely deadlock prone regarding AWT/GTK interaction

please recheck with 16.04 ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510009 Title: Java 1.8.0_66 is extremely

[Openjdk] [Bug 1539900] Re: openjdk-8 in main for upcoming 16.04 LTS

** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539900 Title: openjdk-8 in main for upcoming 16.04 LTS Status in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1544886] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179: dequeue_pending_request: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_unknown_req_in_deq' failed.

** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544886 Title: java assert failure: java: ../../src/xcb_io.c:179:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1385661] Re: Suggests non-existing package "icedtea-8-plugin"

available in 16.04 LTS ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385661 Title: Suggests non-existing

[Openjdk] Bug#814159: avian: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

Package: src:avian Version: 1.1.0-4 Severity: serious User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition The package build-depends or depends one an openjdk-7-* package, which is scheduled for removal for stretch. Please do not depend on a specific openjdk version, but on one of

Re: [Openjdk] Comments regarding icedtea-web_1.6.1-1_amd64.changes

On 26.01.2016 20:03, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi Matthias, marked for accept, but please add the license of icedtea-web-1.6.1/tests/UnitTest++/* to your debian/copyright. added in -2. Matthias ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk

[Openjdk] [Bug 1341628] Re: [needs-packaging]openjdk-8 in 14.04

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1368094 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368094 -100, nobody is doing the work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341628 Title:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >