On 27.04.24 00:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> "Drop hard-coded entry for openjdk-8
>
> In theory this entry was added for 'bootstrapping',
correct.
> but we have definitely
> not needed openjdk-8 for bootstrapping newer openjdks for a long time.
but it's needed to start building openjdk-8 on i386
Removing packages from noble:
openjdk-23 23~15ea-1build1 in noble
openjdk-23-dbg 23~15ea-1build1 in noble amd64
openjdk-23-dbg 23~15ea-1build1 in noble arm64
openjdk-23-dbg 23~15ea-1build1 in noble armhf
openjdk-23-dbg
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049715
Title:
Please merge 11.0.22+7-1 from Debian unstable
Status
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045330
Title:
Please remove these packages before 24.04 LTS
we will keep 22, but remove it from the release pocket, and then
introduce it in the updates pocket.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045330
Title:
Please remove these
** Changed in: openjdk-20 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016437
Title:
Restore jtreg tests in openjdk autopkgtest
Status in
** Changed in: openjdk-21 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2015929
Title:
Move lib/ct.sym file into jdk-headless package
moving that to the source package means, that you have these symlinks
for *all* architectures in the source package. Is this really worth it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Impish)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
openjdk is missing a riscv64 hotspot port.
** Affects: openjdk-17 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: riscv64
** Also affects: openjdk-17 (Ubuntu)
** Package changed: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) => jabref (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: jabref (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934815
Title:
Package: src:openjdk-15
Version: 15.0.1+9-3
Severity: serious
OpenJDK 15 should stay out of testing. We stil want to keep it unstable, as it
is the latest released version.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk
Post to :
Package: openjdk-8
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-9, gcc-9-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with
Package: openjdk-14
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-9, gcc-9-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with
On 12/6/20 6:55 PM, mc36 wrote:
> Package: openjdk-16-jre-headless
> Version: 16~27-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the package works fine for my project however it have to low
> priority assigned to be used by default. please increase!
>
>
> mc36@noti:~$ sudo update-alternatives
On 11/25/20 12:05 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it
> addresses JDK-8250861 [2] (which is serious, although I'm unsure as to
> whether it is DSA-worthy) and there are likely derivatives that would
> benefit from the update, would you mind if
Control: retitle -1 update copyright information
Control: severity -1 important
the pointer to the upstream sources is fixed, still need to update the copyright
information, maybe generate it with a script ...
___
Mailing list:
On 10/24/20 10:18 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
> On 23-10-2020 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 10/7/20 10:33 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On 21-09-2020 17:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>>>> Apparently
>>>
On 10/7/20 10:33 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 21-09-2020 17:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Apparently
>>> the very same tests don't time out on the buildds.
>>
>> I don't know what timeouts apply to buildds, but indeed I think they are
>> much higher to cope with *building* some
On 9/17/20 10:14 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Package: openjdk-11-jdk
> Version: 11.0.8+10-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Justification: violates a "must" directive in policy section 12.5.
>
> The current /usr/share/doc/openjdk-*/copyright files incorrectly
> states that the upstream source is from
On 9/28/20 6:37 PM, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> I agree with Tony's statement that this is a serious issue - and I'm
> also very glad that Julian found the root cause.
afaik, jlink is not used for any package builds, so it cannot be RC serious.
___
Mailing
On 9/24/20 7:47 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> Control: tags 944738 + pending
>
> Hello Matthias,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for openjdk-11 (versioned as 11.0.8+10-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay
> it longer or remove the upload from the queue.
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 release.debian.org
On 9/19/20 9:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: openjdk-15
> Version: 15+36-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: timeout
>
> Dear
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
did a no-change build today in a fresh chroot on a local machine, which
succeeded. Will recheck with the next upload.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk
Post to :
On 8/10/20 2:11 PM, Etienne Dysli Metref wrote:
> On 10.08.20 13:17, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Is this a Debian packaging problem or does upstream provide the wrong
>>> documentation?
>>
>> that's the documentation provided by upstream.
>
> Thank you for the
On 8/10/20 12:49 PM, Etienne Dysli Metref wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> As a Java developer, I'm very much interested in having this bug
> fixed. It has already caused me to give wrong information to other
> people... :/ For example: the java(1) man page lists the option
> `-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemory`,
Package: src:openjdk-11
Version: 11.0.8+10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
The zero build fails on armel. It builds on -13, -14 and -15, so maybe it's
just a bad build in the archive which needs a re-bootstrap.
Maybe related to this, the armhf zero build also fails, now disabled for the
we committed to have that available until the support for 16.04 LTS
ends. Did something change about that?
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in
Package: openjdk-8
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-8, gcc-8-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with
Package: openjdk-11
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-8, gcc-8-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with
no, it should migrate. There is no reason why it should not be available
to users for proper testing. Removing the tag.
** Tags removed: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu.
Review: Approve
patching debian/tests/control.in instead of control, and applied.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/371605
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk:openjdk-11.
Review: Approve
applied
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/371609
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk:openjdk-11.
___
Mailing list:
Review: Approve
applied
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/372017
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk:openjdk-11.
___
Mailing list:
yes,
or add the dlopen_jre_depends as a b-d and a autopkg test dependency. you are
just lucky that xfwm4 depends on those ...
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/370745
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
Review: Approve
committed.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/370796
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk:openjdk-11.
___
Mailing list:
Review: Needs Information
what is needed for running the tests? any dependencies on a gtk2 or gtk3
runtime library?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/+merge/370745
Your team OpenJDK is subscribed to branch
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 openjdk-12 should not release with bullseye
now that buster is released, let openjdk-12 migrate to testing for better
exposure. It will be removed once the upstream security support ends.
___
Mailing
Control: severity 931424 important
As documented in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2019/07/msg9.html
the openjdk-13 packages (and follow-up non OpenJDK LTS releases should get a
little bit more exposure. We just should make sure that these packages are not
part of any Debian
Source: openjdk-13
Version: 13~28-1
Severity: serious
openjdk-13 should stay in unstable for now, it is another short lived version
leading to the next LTS release. However we need these versions to ease updating
our packages.
___
Mailing list:
Package: src:openjdk-8
Version: 8u212-b01-1
Severity: serious
openjdk-8 is staying in unstable. It is used to prepare updates for
stable-security, and to bootstrap kotlin.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk
Post to :
On 11.04.19 20:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi doko,
>
> On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not
>>> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then
>>> people can start testing if the wrapper
On 06.04.19 15:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 06-04-2019 08:55, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> please don't NMU. In the past the atk patches broke the non-atk use case
>>> way too
>>> often. Maybe you want to upload to a PPA or to experimental to give this a
>>> little bit more testing.
>>
>>
On 01.04.19 17:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
>>> Recommends sounds a good idea.
>>>
>>>
Control: reassign -1 src:libreoffice
> IMHO correctly so, some of the changes are so far away from the
> freeze policy..
pointy comments won't help, because you will see these changes at least in the
first buster security update, so maybe some backports for libreoffice are
needed? is that fixed
now fixed in bionic-proposed and cosmic-proposed
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Fix
ntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 T
Control: reassign -1 ca-certificates-java
Control: found -1 20190214
Control: tags -1 + sid buster
the postinst is not ready for OpenJDK >= 12. Please extend the loop for java
versions 12 - 17 (inclusive, the next OpenJDK LTS version).
___
Mailing
Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2
/grouping.
Group 1:
* java-common 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago
-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago
11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1
~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago
0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04
Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20
fixed in bionic-proposed
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: pdfsam (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
(2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20
-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago
(2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20
0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago
.
Group 1:
* java-common 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago
Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20
11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1
~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer
:
* java-common 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3
Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20
~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias
/grouping.
Group 1:
* java-common 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago
0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer
-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx
~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago
-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer
)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback 1:1.2.3
/grouping.
Group 1:
* java-common 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago
-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython
Daitx (2019-02-21)
* javatools 0.72.1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20
Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20
)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java
(2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* logback
Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02
-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago
~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer
Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx
Version: 11.0.2+9-3
fixed at least in 11.0.2+9-3, maybe earlier.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk
Post to : openjdk@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-02-20)
* openjdk-lts 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars
-3ubuntu1~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-07)
Group 2:
* gettext 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2 Matthias Klose (18 hours ago)
* insubstantial 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1 Tiago Stürmer Daitx (2019-02-20)
* jython 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04 Matthias Klose (2019-02-20)
* libgpars-groovy-java 1.2.1-10~18.04.1 Tiago
** Also affects: jython (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814133
Title:
update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS
Status in
** Also affects: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openjfx (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
On 01.02.19 10:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/02/2019 à 09:17, Per Lundberg a écrit :
>
>> I think that risk is significant. If we go that route, I would suggest a
>> postinst/debhelper message saying that "OpenJDK 8 is included but
>> unsupported. Many packages will not work with it. Use at
Public bug reported:
update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS
** Affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
so this is not an openjdk error, and should be fixed in the pacakges itself. See
8211916: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/66a53d6047d1
see the -source 8 passed in the tests.
fixed in 11.0.2 in disco.
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799014
Title:
bold font rendeing in
Package: src:openjdk-11, src:binutils
Severity: important
openjdk-11 ftbfs on alpha, linking libjvm.
full build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openjdk-11=alpha=11.0.2%2B7-1=1547859652=0
[...]
Linking libjvm.so
( /bin/rm -f
Control: tags -1 + important
On 21.01.19 17:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: openjdk-11-jdk
> Version: 11.0.2+7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
no, why are you exaggerating? Both the jre and the jdk are usable.
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>
On 05.12.18 09:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that should not be changed, because the oracle-install needlessly bumps
> the priority over the openjdk, making it the default. This was said
> several times, and it's wrong to remove that conflict.
checked the -8 installer as well, and it has
that should not be changed, because the oracle-install needlessly bumps
the priority over the openjdk, making it the default. This was said
several times, and it's wrong to remove that conflict.
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in:
Control: severity -1 normal
On 05.12.18 09:13, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: openjdk-11
> Version: 11.0.1+13-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Build-Depends: ...
> ...
> openjdk-10-jdk-headless | openjdk-11-jdk-headless,
> ...
>
>
> Unstable buildds only consider the first alternative of build
>
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
No, this is not a clean sid install, it has the the man pages stripped. You
should report that to the provider of update-alternatives. There is nothing
that can be done in the openjdk packages.
The reason that libjvm.so is not stripped is, that jmap needs the debug
information to properly work. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/574997
Afaics we cannot strip this library. jmod now copies that file, shipping it in
fact twice. Sure, if we can get rid of the
On 22.07.2018 01:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 07/21/2018 04:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Please replace the patch with the attached version for the next upload.
>
> The patch was unfortunately incomplete, it missed the size adjustments
> for
1 - 100 of 1067 matches
Mail list logo
