Changeset: b6f62f8bd8e6
Author:vadim
Date: 2014-03-05 12:48 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/b6f62f8bd8e6
RT-16923: Toolkit addListener methods should ignore null listeners
Reviewed-by: anthony, kcr, fheidric
!
Can you check the bug number? This doesn't look right...
I guess it should be https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-35619
On 3/5/2014 10:19 AM, Rafi Tayar wrote:
Hi Daniel, Lisa,
Please review the patch in the Jira :
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-35616
Thanks,
Rafi
As a reminder (and not to pick on Rafi) this is the second time in as
many days that an 8-update review has been sent out for a bug that is
targeted for FX 9. In order to help us better track which bugs are going
into which release, please set the release target as appropriate before
starting
Oops. I didn't read Lisa's and Rafi's follow-on messages about the bug
ID being wrong. Sorry about that.
-- Kevin
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
As a reminder (and not to pick on Rafi) this is the second time in as
many days that an 8-update review has been sent out for a bug that is
targeted for
Hi
On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Martin j...@reportmill.com wrote:
Thanks Tom! I assume the thread was this one:
Font.font() says it is point size but it looks like it are pixels
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2014-January/012398.html
I guess the
Hi,
As evidenced by the screenshots in http://pixelduke.wordpress.com/ blog
posts about JMetro, javafx as noticeably poor font rendering visuals. The
most recent screenshots were taken on a windows 8.1 machine and the older
ones on windows 7, using Segoe UI (windows 7 8 system font).
1- As this
Hi Kirill,
Please review the lambdification of the base component. You are welcome
to apply the patch, but there are numerous changes and they are all
automatic. If you have outstanding changes, please commit them and I
will lambdify once more,
Jira:
.. of course I mean the media component, not base. I just change the
template to say your component ...
Steve
On 2014-03-05 3:41 PM, Stephen F Northover wrote:
Hi Kirill,
Please review the lambdification of the base component. You are
welcome to apply the patch, but there are numerous
Changeset: dc63b991dc39
Author:snorthov
Date: 2014-03-05 15:39 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/dc63b991dc39
ECLIPSE ONLY: fix .classpath
! modules/media/.classpath
Changeset: 143b27648d96
Author:hudson
Date: 2014-03-05 09:01 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2u/dev/rt/rev/143b27648d96
Added tag 2.2.60-b09 for changeset 53d0f8119d8c
! .hgtags
From my tests the font size generated by CSS is what one gets with the same
point size and font using native apps and Qt - my complaint was the font size
when using the Java API.
Tom
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 05.03.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Felipe Heidrich felipe.heidr...@oracle.com:
I don't think we can do what you suggest about the warning, since there
are cases where CSS could be initialized prior to calling into the
application (e.g., the default preloader, deploy dialogs), but I think
it might make sense to add a property to control the scale. Can you file
a JIRA
Has anyone else noticed that Drag and Drop doesn't work with JFXPanel on MacOSX
(unless I'm doing something stupid)?
I filed a bug: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-36127
There is a very simple test case in the comment.
jeff
Hi all,
To change the Java API now would break the universe. All you can do is
add new API. This can be in the form of new methods on Font, however
things like Font.getSize() must always return pixels. A new method can
be added getPoints() and new constructors that take points added, or
Here is the definition of point:
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_units.asp
As Jeff is saying it should be 1/72 inch.
I think this should be the default. Isn't the introduction of modena
potentially going to break more apps than changing the definition of point?
Aren't breaking apps making
Everyone should just accept that there is no such thing as a 'point' in
JavaFX. Work in pixels and you will achieve nirvana.
On 3/5/14, 5:49 PM, Pedro Duque Vieira wrote:
Here is the definition of point:
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_units.asp
As Jeff is saying it should be 1/72 inch.
16 matches
Mail list logo