Re: Unit testing recommendations for JavaFX

2015-03-30 Thread ngalarneau
TestFX is nice. Another option is QF-Test. Neil From: Benjamin Gudehus hasteb...@gmail.com To: Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org, Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Date: 03/30/2015 08:29 AM Subject:Re: Unit testing recommendations for JavaFX Sent by:

Re: Doubts on KeyCode

2015-03-30 Thread Scott Palmer
If I recall correctly there is one keycode named PLUS and another named ADD. One of them refers to the numeric keypad. Scott On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at wrote: hi, suppose you have the following code: package application; import

Re: Doubts on KeyCode

2015-03-30 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
Hi, What I can not explain is why the keyboard + (ascii-code 43) maps to ] (ascii-code 93) from a native-keyevent to KeyCode happens in Glass-Layer. Hmm, the + key on a german keyboard layout [1] is actually ] on the us keyboard layout [2]. But when I type + on my german keyboard with german

Re: Doubts on KeyCode

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi, Yes there is an ADD and a PLUS but both of them claim that they are NOT NUMPAD keyCodes. ADD(0x6B, Add), PLUS(0x0209, Plus), From the location I think ADD should be the a keypad type, when I type + on my keypad I get ADD. Tom On 30.03.15 13:19, Scott Palmer wrote: If I recall correctly

Re: Doubts on KeyCode

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi, I think I'll start to understand, when I type ] on a german keyboard I have to use a modifier key (on OS-X ALT) but the keycode without modifier is the one for the +. Tom On 30.03.15 13:56, Benjamin Gudehus wrote: Hi, What I can not explain is why the keyboard + (ascii-code 43) maps to

Doubts on KeyCode

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Schindl
hi, suppose you have the following code: package application; import javafx.application.Application; import javafx.scene.Scene; import javafx.scene.control.TextField; import javafx.scene.layout.BorderPane; import javafx.stage.Stage; public class Main extends Application {

Re: Unit testing recommendations for JavaFX

2015-03-30 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
There are also Automaton, which is similar to TestFX and supports Swing as well, and MavinFX, which is especially useful to assert Properties. TestFX allows simple and clean testing without much boiler-plate code. When we took JavaFX into consideration for a migration of our geographical

Re: Questions/possible bugs about JDK 1.8.0 + OpenJFK on the PI 2

2015-03-30 Thread David Hill
On 3/26/15, 7:03 PM, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:40:41 +0100, Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it wrote: The mouse is ok, it was probably a connection fault. The keyboard navigation of buttons is still not working - still investigating. The keyboard is

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-30 Thread Jim Graham
On 3/30/15 12:04 PM, Jim Graham wrote: drawPolygon() is a very complex operation that involves things like: - dealing with only rendering common points of intersection once An example of the distinction here - try a test case where you execute the exact same diagonal line primitive 1,000

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-30 Thread Jim Graham
Hi Chris, drawLine() is a very simple primitive that can be optimized with a GPU shader. It either looks like a (potentially rotated) rectangle or a rounded rect - and we have optimized shaders for both cases. A large number of drawLine() calls turns into simply accumulating a large vertex

Re: Packaging a JFX app in a gradle build system

2015-03-30 Thread Danno Ferrin
Yes, bitbucket is the main repo, github is a mirror (currently out of date). (sorry for the late response, just got back from a long spring break). On Mar 28, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote: I believe the bitbucket repo is the main page. At least the bintray page

9-dev and 8u-dev unlocked + reminder about pushing changesets

2015-03-30 Thread Kevin Rushforth
The 9-dev and 8u-dev repos are unlocked. As a reminder, please note the following. All changesets that were pushed to 8u-dev prior to 1am this morning are already in 9-dev. Starting now, bug fixes go into 9-dev first and then to 8u-dev -- or else pushed at the same time if they are safe,

Review Request: RT-39975 - AppCDS support for packager

2015-03-30 Thread Danno Ferrin
Kevin, Chris, please review jira: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-39975 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shemnon/RT-39975/webrev.00/

Re: Review Request: RT-39975 - AppCDS support for packager

2015-03-30 Thread Chris Bensen
+1 On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Danno Ferrin danno.fer...@oracle.com wrote: Kevin, Chris, please review jira: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-39975 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shemnon/RT-39975/webrev.00/