Hi Kevin,
Please, review the fix:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090062
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8090062/webrev.0
Thanks,
Anton.
As long as SceneBuilder is maintained I'm all for FXML. It is entirely useless
without SceneBuilder though, and doing complex UI layouts without SceneBuilder
is a pain in the butt.
I have no issues with CSS either. There's no need to keep inventing new ways of
doing what CSS does. It's much
I share your view of FXML and CSS. I will not shed a single tear if the
support for them is dropped tomorrow. My main problem with CSS is that it
lacks any sort of static type checking.
Tomas
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:36 AM, cogmission (David Ray)
cognitionmiss...@gmail.com wrote:
The
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/javafx/user-interface-tutorial/table-view
.htm
Why are the SimpleStringProperties in the person class private?
IMHO the Person class should be:
Example 13-3 Creating the Person Class
public static class Person {
public final SimpleStringProperty
Point2D is immutable by design, so there are no setters. And yes, the
private variables for x and y could be made final, but since that's not
API it would just add a bit of clarity to the implementation.
-- Kevin
Sam Howman wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering why there such a method or even
Hi,
I'm wondering why there such a method or even setX/setY. I understand that
some classes prevent such manipulation of their initial values although it
seems like moving a point would be a very common thing to want to do. The
alternative would be to create a new Point2D whenever you would have
Hello,
I try to crosscompile with WebKit enabled for raspberry pi, armv6hf,
But it need Qt libraries.
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so: file not recognized: File
format not recognized
How to add Qt libraries to webkit 1.3 dependencies?
Since it is private, I'm not sure, but it couldn't hurt and is a good
idea -- NetBeans suggests making it final, since it can be.
Jim Graham wrote:
Would adding final to the field declarations also aid in the
inline-ability of the getters?
...jim
On 7/29/15 5:32 PM, Kevin
Some other comments about this class (and Point3D):
* In calculating the magnitude (and distance): Math.sqrt(a * a + b * b)
could be replaced with Math.hypot(a,b) to get the advantage of avoiding
intermediate underflow and overflow
* distanceSquared functions are faster for doing comparisons of
The argument against emulated LFs hinges on one point: That they will
always be one step behind.
This (Greg Brown et al.) is a fallacy!
The reason being is that companies like Apple and Google count on
affinity, acculturation, and familiarization with a given method of
presentation in order to
Hi again everybody, I'm attaching an .bbappend that I use to get right EGL
libraries on /opt/VIVANTE-fb. Remembering that
I'm using Dizzy release of Yocto.
Best regards,
- dhs
2015-07-08 17:37 GMT-03:00 Daniel. danielhi...@gmail.com:
Hi everybody!
I finally got it working! Here is what I
Hi,
I just wanted to share some opinions close to my heart...
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/exposing-myth-case-javafx-emulated-lfs-david-ray?published=t
Cheers,
David
--
*With kind regards,*
David Ray
Java Solutions Architect
*Cortical.io http://cortical.io/*
Sponsor of: HTM.java
Would adding final to the field declarations also aid in the
inline-ability of the getters?
...jim
On 7/29/15 5:32 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Point2D is immutable by design, so there are no setters. And yes, the
private variables for x and y could be made final, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
