Blurring 1px border

Hi guys, I've found a very strange thing about JavaFX and borders. If an element has *-fx-border-width: 1 1 1 1;*, then the border will be a bit blur (not exactly 1px). But if it's declared as *-fx-border-width: 0 1 1 1;*, then the border is perfectly sharp (exactly 1px). I've attached java

[9] Review request for 8133839: StringIndexOutOfBoundsException in setter search when using

Jonathan, Please review the fix: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133839 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8133839/webrev.00/ Thanks, Vadim

Re: Blurring 1px border

Thanks for confirming. We have at least one other example of a similar issue that still happens in 8u60: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133826 Can you please file a new bug? Your issue may or may not be the same as JDK-8133826, so it would be good to have another test case.

[9] Review request for 8129401: Bindings.bindContentBidirectional does not work correctly

Chien, Please review the fix: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129401 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8129401/webrev.00/ Thanks, Vadim

Re: Blurring 1px border

Hi Kevin, sorry for not mentioning that: it's JDK8u60. I've just double checked and reinstalled it from oracle.com. P.S. I also attache the screenshot. Regards, Konstantin Pasko 2015-08-19 16:40 GMT+02:00 Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com: What version of the JDK are you using? We

Re: OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions

On 08/18/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Currently the gradle openZip method makes it easy to create builds that unpack into OpenJDK / Zulu JDK but this assumes a pre-Jigsaw (JRE) structure and doesn't work with JDK9. Shall I submit a bug? We are in the process of making major

Re: JEP 253: UI control skins and input mapping discussion

I provided my feedback on the input mapping API some 4 months ago here (be warned, it is a *long* discussion) https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091189 I am very disappointed that this API is being pushed forward with all its flaws. It is both overly complex (both conceptually and in terms

Re: JEP 253: UI control skins and input mapping discussion

Tomas, As it stands there exists two approaches being proposed (my one and yours). The purpose of my job is to create new API that benefits the community - your disappointment that I'm doing that is itself disappointing to me! :-) I couldn't progress our discussion in JDK-8091189 any further

Re: JEP 253: UI control skins and input mapping discussion

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jonathan Giles jonathan.gi...@oracle.com wrote: Tomas, I hope you'll agree that throughout our long discussion on JBS we both improved our implementations based on our discussion. To say that I haven't addressed your issues isn't fair - I worked with you to

Re: JEP 253: UI control skins and input mapping discussion

Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Giles jonathan.gi...@oracle.com wrote: Tomas, As it stands there exists two approaches being proposed (my one and yours). The purpose of my job is to create new API that benefits the community - your disappointment that I'm doing that

Re: JEP 253: UI control skins and input mapping discussion

Tomas, I hope you'll agree that throughout our long discussion on JBS we both improved our implementations based on our discussion. To say that I haven't addressed your issues isn't fair - I worked with you to understand your issues and I addressed many of them as my InputMap implementation