In moving most of the skin code to public API (as part of JEP 253), I
worked with the plan of minimising the API as much as possible, and
would then spend time this year bringing API back out in a more
considered way (as opposed to dumping all skin code, warts and all, into
public API and making mistakes). I am happyto make more API public, and
have been encouraging people heavily at conferences to start playing
with JDK 9 _today_. Your bug is now on my radar - I will look into it ASAP.
-- Jonathan
On 30/01/16 2:14 AM, faste...@swingempire.de wrote:
On the move into public, its abstract methods
columnVisibility/Width/Property
changed scope from protected to package - this makes the base class
rather useless
for extension: it's main job is sync'ing the cell's visible property
to the
column's visible property and triggering and doing the cell's layout.
Both are possible only, if subclasses provide the column properties.
Would suggest to change scope back to protected. Or any special
reasons for
not doing it?
Cheers
Jeanette
