Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

> On May 27, 2016, at 1:30 AM, Tom Schindl wrote: > > Do you have an example how to construct such a Layer? // path is the path to javafx-swt.jar ModuleFinder finder = ModuleFinder.of(path); Configuration cf = Layer.boot() .configuration()

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

We're too focused on JDK 9 to think about JDK 10 yet. After we stabilize JDK 9 we'll start planning. At that time we will solicit feedback from the openjfx-dev community to help prioritize. -- Kevin Konstantin Pasko wrote: Hi Kevin, sorry for the offtopic, but as you just mentioned JDK 10,

Open test development: JDK-8139764

Please look at my new test for regression JDK-8139764 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arusakov/8139764/webrev.00/

Re: JavaFX with Eclipse and JDK9

Where did you download it from? What build is it (i.e., what is the output of "java -version")? Can you run "java -listmods" and see whether the javafx.* modules are there? -- Kevin Dr. Michael Paus wrote: I recently tried to get a JavaFX application running with the latest EA build of JDK9

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

As I mentioned before, it is a non-trivial amount of work to integrate it into FX. We don't use the WebKit native renderer, rather the WebKit renderer is implemented by calling into Prism. Further, we use DirectX on Windows, which adds an additional complication (yes I know that WebGL has a

JavaFX with Eclipse and JDK9

I recently tried to get a JavaFX application running with the latest EA build of JDK9 from within Eclipse but I failed. Can anybody on this list tell me what I have to do to get that working? I have the latest milestone release of Eclipse Neon installed together with the latest JDK9 and I have

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

Can you at least let me know why the JavaFX usage of WebKit does *not* support WebGL when native WebKit itself always has? Is there some technical or architectural barrier? > On 27 May 2016, at 22:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > > No, I don't have anything further to

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Thanks for confirming. So it sounds like we have a workable plan. -- Kevin Alan Bateman wrote: On 27/05/2016 13:47, Kevin Rushforth wrote: The qualified exports are done using reflection to the calling module that contains the javafx.embed.swt.FXCanvas class, irrespective of the name of

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

On 27/05/2016 13:47, Kevin Rushforth wrote: The qualified exports are done using reflection to the calling module that contains the javafx.embed.swt.FXCanvas class, irrespective of the name of the module (so it works even when the javafx.embed.swt package is in the unnamed module). I plan

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

No, I don't have anything further to add about WebGL, if that's what you are asking. As for moving to Blink, that would be a very large effort. We do not currently plan to do this for JDK 10, but could reevaluate it in the future if something changes. -- Kevin Felix Bembrick wrote: Any

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Alan Bateman wrote: On 26/05/2016 16:38, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Yes, I've tested it in both modes (with a simple HelloFXCanvas program) -- as an automatic jar file and as just an ordinary jar on the classpath. Just curious, if there are qualified exports to javafx.swt then how it does when

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

On 26/05/2016 16:38, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Yes, I've tested it in both modes (with a simple HelloFXCanvas program) -- as an automatic jar file and as just an ordinary jar on the classpath. Just curious, if there are qualified exports to javafx.swt then how it does when on the class path?

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

Any comments on this? Isn't it time to move to Blink? > On 13 May 2016, at 04:32, Felix Bembrick wrote: > > Thanks Kevin. > > I was more curious as to why WebGL support hasn't been there since day 1, > given that WebKit itself supports it. > > Felix > >> On 13 May

[webkit] [9] Review request for 8157509: UserDataDirectoryTest fails on Windows platforms with updated WebKit

Hello Kevin, Guru, Murali, Please review the fix for UserDataDirectoryTest failure. JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157509 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arajkumar/8157509/webrev.00 Issue: New WebKit takes around 5 mins to close the sqlite-db file associated with

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Do you have an example how to construct such a Layer? Tom Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 26.05.2016 um 17:47 schrieb Mandy Chung : > > >> On May 26, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Kevin Rushforth >> wrote: >> >> Yes, I've tested it in both modes

RE: Mouse events blocked during DnD inside JFXPanel - bug or limitation?

Sorry I forgot to add - I'm using 1.8.0_66 on Windows 7. Cheers, Rob -Original Message- From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Fisher, Robert Sent: Freitag, 27. Mai 2016 10:07 To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Mouse events blocked during DnD