I'm not aware of any specific timeline.
-- Kevin
Michael Paus wrote:
This is great news and I think this could give JavaFX a boost if it
were readily available in all OpenJDK builds
(also on other platforms than Linux). Is there already a time frame
for when this is planned?
Michael
Am
To add to this, if you are interested in participating in the discussion
about the JEP, the discussion should happen on jdk-dev.
When Victor is ready to post a webrev, he will cross-post the review to
both jdk-dev and openjfx-dev.
-- Kevin
victor.droz...@oracle.com wrote:
New JEP
New JEP Candidate:
JEP 311: Java Packager API & CLI: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/311
Mailing list for further discussion: jdk-...@openjdk.java.net
--Victor
This is great news and I think this could give JavaFX a boost if it were
readily available in all OpenJDK builds
(also on other platforms than Linux). Is there already a time frame for
when this is planned?
Michael
Am 18.10.17 um 14:19 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
We are looking to include FX for
I should note that providing OpenJDK binaries for platforms other than
Linux is also planned.
-- Kevin
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
For JDK 9 and 9 updates this will always be the case. We are looking
to include FX for future releases (which will require some hopefully
minor build changes).
--
For JDK 9 and 9 updates this will always be the case. We are looking to
include FX for future releases (which will require some hopefully minor
build changes).
-- Kevin
Adam Granger wrote:
Oracle is now doing OpenJDK builds, e.g. 9.0.1 at http://jdk.java.net/9/
However these don't appear
Oracle is now doing OpenJDK builds, e.g. 9.0.1 at http://jdk.java.net/9/
However these don't appear to include JavaFX. Is this intentional? Will this
always be the case in the future?
Thanks.
Adam.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
