Re: More community participation in JavaFX

Hi Kevin, As a long-time observer of the OpenJFX project, let me put all my chips at this point on making builds more stable, bullet-proof, and automated, and give equal weight making them so on Win10 and OS/X, specifically, the same weight as is given to making building and developing on

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

I think that having a public sandbox mirror on GitHub, as you mentioned, is a great idea. The idea is that PRs could be opened and the test suites could be run using CI for the platforms supported by JavaFX. The PR itself would never be directly merged into the OpenJFX hg repository. Instead the

More community participation in JavaFX

To: OpenJFX Developers We are looking to grow the community of contributors to the OpenJFX project, especially serious contributors who will stick around long enough to become reviewers, to help us keep the platform vibrant. To this end we are looking at ways to encourage more participation

Re: JDK-8196130: Eclipse configuration files need to be updated

So it seems either a workaround is needed, or else maybe create two Eclipse projects: one for the sources and one for the tests. -- Kevin Michael Paus wrote: Am 01.02.18 um 19:41 schrieb Nir Lisker: Looks like I understood the problem. Eclipse does not support (yet) multiple modules per

Re: Public API for Robot Class

I didn't see this before I replied with basically the same answer. -- Kevin Michael Ennen wrote: I have a thread on this list entitled "Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and ParametersImpl in the Public API". I have made a webrev of the suggested changes. Kevin is going to look at the changes

Re: Public API for Robot Class

Yes, there is interest in creating a public JavaFX API for Robot. See the following: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-January/021212.html This is a good reminder, mostly to myself, that I need to do a review of the proof-of-concept. -- Kevin August Nagro wrote:

Re: Public API for Robot Class

Great news; thanks! On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:03 PM Michael Ennen wrote: > I have a thread on this list entitled "Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and > ParametersImpl in the Public API". > > I have made a webrev of the suggested changes. > > Kevin is going to look at the

Re: Public API for Robot Class

I have a thread on this list entitled "Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and ParametersImpl in the Public API". I have made a webrev of the suggested changes. Kevin is going to look at the changes sometime after RDP 2. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:49 PM, August Nagro wrote:

Re: JDK-8196130: Eclipse configuration files need to be updated

It probably makes sense to submit what you have now as a partially working solution. As for Eclipse making any changes, I'm not sure there is a spec you could point to ... we do some of the same magic that I'm sure other projects have had to do w.r.t running tests: * We have test "shims"

Re: JDK-8196130: Eclipse configuration files need to be updated

Am 01.02.18 um 19:41 schrieb Nir Lisker: Looks like I understood the problem. Eclipse does not support (yet) multiple modules per project. Do you know any specifications I can point them to to fix this properly? I would not expect a change of this any time soon. There was a lengthy discussion