Hi,
I'd like to request a review for JDK-8207377 available
as a PR on Github:
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/140
Thanks.
--
Michael Ennen
Hi,
I'd like to request a review for JDK-8207370 available
as a PR on Github:
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/135
Thanks.
--
Michael Ennen
Hi,
I'd like to request a review for JDK-8207794 [1] available as a PR [2]
on the Github-Mirror.
Thanks
Tom
[1]https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207794
[2]https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/139
On 2018-07-23T17:22:34 +0200
Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> So it seems these issues are not OpenJFX specific, and more projects will
> run into this?
> I'm a bit worried about the grey zone between OpenJDK and Maven/Gradle...
> @Kevin are you aware of someone from the jigsaw team who is
Alan Bateman is probably the best person to ask about this, although I
don't know how much he has looked into what maven is doing w.r.t. modules.
The problem here seems to be that the dummy jar doesn't have a
module-info.class, and so will become an automatic module with a name
chosen based
On 2018-07-23T10:49:29 +0100
Paul Ray Russell wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I do find the following:
> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/2397 - and I notice in your
> POM you're using an annotation processor path.
Removed that. Same error, unfortunately.
I feel like we may be looking at
On 2018-07-23T09:42:56 +0200
Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi Mark, Paul,
>
> I can't reproduce the issue, as I'm running into these warnings that are
> turned into errors, apparantly:
>
> [WARNING] Rule 4: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireProperty failed
> with message:
> Property
Hi Mark, Paul,
I can't reproduce the issue, as I'm running into these warnings that are
turned into errors, apparantly:
[WARNING] Rule 4: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireProperty failed
with message:
Property "io7m.api.previousVersion" evaluates to "". This does not match
the regular
