On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:15:21 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> Currently, `WebPage` has already a public `setBackgroundColor()` method, but
>> the class is not public. Therefore, public API is needed in `WebView` to
>> allow developers access to it.
>>
>> In line with the `fontSmoothingType`
I've gotten back to look at this.
For now I'm dealing only with the nullableMapping method in Bindings so we
can limit the amount of new classes to LazyObjectBinding (FlatMapBinding
and ConditionalBinding can come later). This method is used by map, orElse
and orElseGet in ObservableValue. Of
I have not looked at the code yet but why does this have to be part of
OpenJFX and can not be implemented as an external library?
Tom
Am 05.08.21 um 00:25 schrieb John Hendrikx:
Perhaps:
Fluent bindings for ObservableValue https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434
It was received well I
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:15:21 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> Currently, `WebPage` has already a public `setBackgroundColor()` method, but
>> the class is not public. Therefore, public API is needed in `WebView` to
>> allow developers access to it.
>>
>> In line with the `fontSmoothingType`
I think that we need your input on this to move it forward.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 7:49 AM Nir Lisker wrote:
> so the value field should perhaps be nulled out when bound.
>
>
> There was a PR for something like that in the old repo:
> https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/110
>
> On
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:15:21 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> Currently, `WebPage` has already a public `setBackgroundColor()` method, but
>> the class is not public. Therefore, public API is needed in `WebView` to
>> allow developers access to it.
>>
>> In line with the `fontSmoothingType`
I'm willing to invest the necessary time in this.
What should a concrete proposal consist of? Is there a format for this
that I can follow (like
https://gist.github.com/brcolow/26370db6cab0355186d4a1d13b30fc19 for
example?)
Otherwise I can flesh out a small document with the Why, What, How
Bump release version in `jfx17u` repo to 17.0.1 for the start of a new release.
-
Commit messages:
- 8273279: Change JavaFX release version in jfx17u to 17.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/2/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=2=00
This PR updates
[`README.md`](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx17u/blob/3082a845253dd00d46d36500abc42464459e59ed/README.md)
and
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx17u/blob/3082a845253dd00d46d36500abc42464459e59ed/CONTRIBUTING.md)
to be suitable for update releases. The two files
Hi Scott,
Your points about .jmod are very valid, but I see this discussion somehow
separated from the original one.
There are plenty of developers using maven to compile, build and run JavaFX
applications. They need a maven-solution for those lifecycles.
Being pragmatic, I don't think native
10 matches
Mail list logo