Hi Alex,
Do you have the following entry in the .desktop file of your application[1]:
StartupWMClass=com.foo.bar.FooApplication
-Abhinay
[1] https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder/pull/407
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Alex Orlov
Sent: Thursday, May 26,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:50:07 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 18.0.1 to the repository
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f0099c25
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Nir Lisker
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
Add release notes for JavaFX 18.0.1 to the repository
-
Commit messages:
- Add list of security fixes
- 8285475: Create release notes for 18.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/785/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=785=00
Issue:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 10:18:07 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 18 to the repository
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: df43d2bd
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 10:07:26 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
>> Add release notes for JavaFX 18 to the repository
>
> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
> broug
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:08:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
>
>> @kevinrushforth Before I integrate the PR, can you have a look at [my
>> comment on the
>>
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:31:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
>>
>> - s/Enhancement/Enhancements
>> - Create release
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:25:09 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> This regression was caused in PR #667 in which I didn't take into account the
> lower bounds. I have added more tests and one manual test along with the fix.
> The manual test can be used to identify any future issues w
> Add release notes for JavaFX 18 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
commits si
Add release notes for JavaFX 18 to the repository
-
Commit messages:
- Create release notes for JavaFX 18
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/752/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=752=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8282766
> This regression was caused in PR #667 in which I didn't take into account the
> lower bounds. I have added more tests and one manual test along with the fix.
> The manual test can be used to identify any future issues with paths outside
> lower and upper bounds easily.
Abhinay
This regression was caused in PR #667 in which I didn't take into account the
lower bounds. I have added more tests and one manual test along with the fix.
The manual test can be used to identify any future issues with paths outside
lower and upper bounds easily.
-
Commit
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:58:54 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Release Notes for 17.0.2
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 3aa459eb
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/com
> Release Notes for 17.0.2
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Remove build and test changes
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/28/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.
> Release Notes for 17.0.2
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Add security fix
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/28/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:18:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix formatting
>
> doc-files/release-notes-17.0.2.md line 17:
> Release Notes for 17.0.2
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Fix formatting
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/28/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:58:54 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Release Notes for 17.0.2
doc-files/release-notes-17.0.2.md line 18:
> 16: | [JDK-8272638](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8272638) |
> Update copyright header for files modified in 2021 | other|
>
Release Notes for 17.0.2
-
Commit messages:
- 8280172: Create release notes for JavaFX 17.0.2
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/28/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=28=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280172
Stats:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 05:34:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> This work improves the performance of `MultipleSelectionModel` over large
> data sets by caching some values and avoiding unnecessary calls to
> `SelectedIndicesList#size`. It further improves the performance by reducing
>
f an element in the
> BitSet.
>
> The work is based on [an abandoned
> patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/127) submitted by @yososs
>
> There are currently 2 manual tests for this fix.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
c
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 21:01:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Remove commented out method. Document constructors.
>> - Add tests
>
> m
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:32:06 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> A cache that's manually invalidated and then validated when needed is a form
>> of lazy evaluation. The main point, regardless of how you name it, is to
>> ensure that every call that modifies the underlying BitSet invalidates the
>>
f an element in the
> BitSet.
>
> The work is based on [an abandoned
> patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/127) submitted by @yososs
>
> There are currently 2 manual tests for this fix.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
c
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:46:54 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update ROW_COUNT to 700_000
>
> modules/javafx.controls/src/
f an element in the
> BitSet.
>
> The work is based on [an abandoned
> patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/127) submitted by @yososs
>
> There are currently 2 manual tests for this fix.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
c
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:18:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update ROW_COUNT to 700_000
>
> modules/javafx.controls/src/
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:40:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This work improves the performance of `MultipleSelectionModel` over large
>> data sets by caching some values and avoiding unnecessary calls to
>> `SelectedIndicesList#size`. It further improves the performance by reducing
>> the
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:10:08 GMT, yosbits wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update ROW_COUNT to 700_000
>
> tests/manual/controls/SelectTableViewTest.java line 1
f an element in the
> BitSet.
>
> The work is based on [an abandoned
> patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/127) submitted by @yososs
>
> There are currently 2 manual tests for this fix.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:54:59 GMT, yosbits wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove duplicate entry for test data
>
> tests/manual/controls/SelectListViewTest.java li
f an element in the
> BitSet.
>
> The work is based on [an abandoned
> patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/127) submitted by @yososs
>
> There are currently 2 manual tests for this fix.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:44:47 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> PathElements were skipped in AreaChart if the data point were outside axis
> bounds and had duplicate value for either x or y. This is now fixed with this
> PR.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 0dbdec
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:53:07 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
>> This work improves the performance of `MultipleSelectionModel` over large
>> data sets by caching some values and avoiding unnecessary calls to
>> `SelectedIndicesList#size`. It further improves the performance by reducing
>> the number
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:54:30 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> This work improves the performance of `MultipleSelectionModel` over large
>> data sets by caching some values and avoiding unnecessary calls to
>> `SelectedIndicesList#size`. It further improves the performance by reducing
>> the number
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:06:08 GMT, Tom Schindl wrote:
>> modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/ReadOnlyUnbackedObservableList.java
>> line 119:
>>
>>> 117: Object obj = get(i);
>>> 118: if (o.equals(obj)) return i;
>>> 119: }
>>
>>
> PathElements were skipped in AreaChart if the data point were outside axis
> bounds and had duplicate value for either x or y. This is now fixed with this
> PR.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Up
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:07:37 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix condition and add more tests
>
> modules/javafx.controls/src/tes
> PathElements were skipped in AreaChart if the data point were outside axis
> bounds and had duplicate value for either x or y. This is now fixed with this
> PR.
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Fix
This work improves the performance of `MultipleSelectionModel` over large data
sets by caching some values and avoiding unnecessary calls to
`SelectedIndicesList#size`. It further improves the performance by reducing the
number of iterations required to find the index of an element in the
PathElements were skipped in AreaChart if the data point were outside axis
bounds and had duplicate value for either x or y. This is now fixed with this
PR.
-
Commit messages:
- Remove trailing whitespace
- Remove unwanted import
- Update tests
- 8276490: Incorrect path is
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:59:17 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Release Notes for 17.0.1
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 23545b4f
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/23545b4fb3d963a052ad81452e06ac71a718a
Release Notes for 17.0.1
-
Commit messages:
- 8275361: Create release notes for JavaFX 17.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/14/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=14=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275361
Stats:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:42:37 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> Release notes for 17.0.1
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/644
Release notes for 17.0.1
-
Commit messages:
- Update content to match 15.0.1 release notes
- 8275361: Create release notes for JavaFX 17.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/644/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=644=00
Issue:
Hi,
I recently worked on removing a few left-over Traversal engine usage in
ControlsFX [1].
It can be tricky, sometimes impossible, to get the traversal part right in a
custom control which can be done using 2 lines if Traversal API was present [2].
This made me thinking if there is a scope
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:09:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> 8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d356340b
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:59:47 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> Re-introduce `Automatic-Module-Name` for empty jars until a better
> alternative to empty jars has been finalized.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7329279e
Author:Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vo
Re-introduce `Automatic-Module-Name` for empty jars until a better alternative
to empty jars has been finalized.
-
Commit messages:
- 8273754: Re-introduce Automatic-Module-Name in empty jars
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/623/files
Webrev:
Hi Clemens,
If you have any thoughts/suggestions, please let us know.
-Abhinay
From: clemens.lantha...@itarchitects.at
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 6:46 PM
To: Abhinay Agarwal
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: JavaFX 17 Maven Artifacts
Thanks
JavaFX 17 Maven artifacts currently fail to compile modular JavaFX application.
The non-modular application still works.
To explain what's going on, let have a look at JavaFX and its Maven
distribution since version 11:
1. JavaFX is distributed in non-platform (empty) and platform specific
JavaFX 17 Maven artifacts currently fail to compile modular JavaFX application.
The non-modular application still work.
To explain what's going on, let have a look at JavaFX and its Maven
distribution since version 11:
1. JavaFX is distributed in non-platform (empty) and platform specific
> Add release notes for JavaFX 17 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Remove list items as per review
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/619/files
- new: ht
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:11:41 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 17 to the repository
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 24d0600a
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
Add release notes for JavaFX 17 to the repository
-
Commit messages:
- 8273343: Create release notes for JavaFX 17
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/619/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=619=00
Issue:
> 8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Add default value tests for setting / getting the managed property
- Replace with HTML equivalent code
-
Chan
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:09:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> 8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
I started a [discussion on the mailing
list](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2021-August/031520.html).
Is there anything else pending to move this PR forw
s
include "**/*swt*.jar"
includeEmptyDirs = false
rename ".*swt.*jar", "swt-debug\\.jar"
// duplicatesStrategy = DuplicatesStrategy.WARN
}
________
From: Kevin Rushforth
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 2:24 AM
To: Abhinay Agarwal
On 8/12/2021 12:33 PM, Abhinay Agarwal wrote:
> I am on Ubuntu 20.04. Using ANT 1.10.8, "gradlew apps" works for me.
>
> However, "gradlew sdk" fails for me since we upgraded to Gradle 7.0.1. I
> always switch back to Gradle 6.9 to build a local sdk.
> __
Every now and then, I miss having the capability to (un)manage nodes in its
Parent via CSS. There have been similar requests[1] in the past. A combination
of visibility and -fx-managed would allow developers/designers to completely
hide a node via CSS, without altering its height and width.
I
I am on Ubuntu 20.04. Using ANT 1.10.8, "gradlew apps" works for me.
However, "gradlew sdk" fails for me since we upgraded to Gradle 7.0.1. I always
switch back to Gradle 6.9 to build a local sdk.
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Thiago
Milczarek Sayão
Sent:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:09:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> 8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8272386
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/602
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:09:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> JDK-8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
Thanks for the feedback. I will create a CSR and start a thread on the mailing
list.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/602
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:09:46 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> JDK-8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
Past OpenJFX mailing list discussion:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2015-July/017597.html
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/602
JDK-8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8172095: Let Node.managed become CSS-styleable
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/602/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=602=00
Issue:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:42:14 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> 8264998: Empty Jars shouldn't have Automatic-Module-Name
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 02b078a8
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/com
JDK-8264998: Remove Automatic-Module-Name from empty jars
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8264998: Remove Automatic-Module-Name from empty jars
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/484/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=484=00
Issue:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:25:14 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e0ce73a3
Author: Abhinay Agarwal
Committer: Johan Vos
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/e0ce73a3
St
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:21:06 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?filter=40381
Hi @kevinrushforth ,
Thanks for this list. You may want to add `test_sprint` to the list of labels :)
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/414
> Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- 8262460: Fix markdown table layout
- 8262460: Add release notes for JDK-8256362 and JDK-8196079. Remove test bugs
and bu
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:09:51 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Right, I was confused when I saw the tag 15.0.1+0 but it is indeed in 15.
>
> There might be other issues like that. Maybe the backport issue type should
> be filtered.
This has already been taken care of. I have removed all the issues
> Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8262460: Sort issues first by sub-component followed by bug id
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:00:07 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> doc-files/rel
> Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared
to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit
si
> Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 27 additional commits
si
Add release notes for JavaFX 16 to the repository
-
Commit messages:
- 8262460: Create release notes for JavaFX 16
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/414/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=414=00
Issue:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:52:55 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> Both DialogPane and ContextMenu have a child node with a style-class
> `graphic-container`. This leads to a corner case where an unwanted style is
> applied to ContextMenu when it is shown on a DialogPane.
This pull reques
Both DialogPane and ContextMenu have a child node with a style-class
`graphic-container`. This leads to a corner case where an unwanted style is
applied to ContextMenu when it is shown on a DialogPane.
-
Commit messages:
- Remove executable flag from image and move it to correct
Hi,
Classes which extends Node have access to the protected method
`setEventHandler`[1]. It makes it exceptional easy to register a user-defined
onXXX event handler.
However, for custom EventTarget which do not extend Node, it becomes cumbersome
as JavaFX expects us to create a whole new
On Thu, 14 May 2020 19:22:54 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> In Android, TextInputControls (TextField and TextArea) are responsible for
> showing and hiding software keyboard.
> Currently, a focus listener is attached to these controls and is used to
> toggle the visibility
ready has focus but the keyboard
> is not visible. Ideally, the keyboard
> should be shown again when the user taps on the TextInputControl.
> This PR adds an event handler for `MouseEvent.MOUSE_CLICKED` event and shows
> the keyboard if the TextInput control is
> both editable
ready has focus but the keyboard
> is not visible. Ideally, the keyboard
> should be shown again when the user taps on the TextInputControl.
> This PR adds an event handler for `MouseEvent.MOUSE_CLICKED` event and shows
> the keyboard if the TextInput control is
> both editable
On Fri, 29 May 2020 16:48:29 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Abhinay Agarwal has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix typo: dispose should remove event handler
>
> worth discussing the case were a
ready has focus but the keyboard
> is not visible. Ideally, the keyboard
> should be shown again when the user taps on the TextInputControl.
> This PR adds an event handler for `MouseEvent.MOUSE_CLICKED` event and shows
> the keyboard if the TextInput control is
> both editable
On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:23:38 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> @kleopatra Done!
>
> wondering if there is any way to include android specific skins in unit
> testing? For all (nearly, htmlEditor excluded
> ;) others we have a test to guard against contract violations (and will soon
> have
ready has focus but the keyboard
> is not visible. Ideally, the keyboard
> should be shown again when the user taps on the TextInputControl.
> This PR adds an event handler for `MouseEvent.MOUSE_CLICKED` event and shows
> the keyboard if the TextInput control is
> both editable
On Fri, 15 May 2020 10:58:14 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> In Android, TextInputControls (TextField and TextArea) are responsible for
>> showing and hiding software keyboard.
>> Currently, a focus listener is attached to these controls and is used to
>> toggle the visibility of keyboard.
ready has focus but the keyboard
> is not visible. Ideally, the keyboard
> should be shown again when the user taps on the TextInputControl.
> This PR adds an event handler for `MouseEvent.MOUSE_CLICKED` event and shows
> the keyboard if the TextInput control is
> both editable
In Android, TextInputControls (TextField and TextArea) are responsible for
showing and hiding software keyboard.
Currently, a focus listener is attached to these controls and is used to toggle
the visibility of keyboard. This
condition fails in cases where the control already has focus but the
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:12:07 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal
wrote:
> Update WebEngine's Javadoc to add information on how it switches to
> HttpClient instead of URLConnection in JavaFX 14
> when used with JDK 12 or later.
> Identification of the correct client is important as both these
Hi Ty Young,
I am trying to identify which part of the documentation changed after JavaFX
13. The JVM arguments that you have specified are required since JavaFX 11.
Alternatively, user doesn't need to pass these arguments if they are using
javafx-maven-plugin to build and run the application.
Hi,
Scene Builder is open-sourced [1]. If you find something can be improved,
please feel free to send a PR. All the style-sheets use to style Scene Builder
can be found in the repository [2].
-- Abhinay
[1] https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder
[2]
Hi Apurwa,
Any FXML created by Scene Builder 11 can be used by JavaFX 14.
> I tried downloading the latest version of Scene Builder but its not
> compatible with javafx.
Can you pleases explain what incompatibility issues are you facing?
-- Abhinay
From:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:53:46 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> The issue occurs because the key events are consumed by the `ListView` in
> `Popup`, which displays the items.
> This is a regression of
> [JDK-8077916](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077916). This change
> aadded several
>
Update WebEngine's Javadoc to add information on how it switches to HttpClient
instead of URLConnection in JavaFX 14
when used with JDK 12 or later.
Identification the correct client is important as both these clients may offer
different ways to achieve a task. One
such task can be bypassing
/javafx.controls/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/behavior/FocusTraversalInputMap.java#L53
P.S. I sincerely hope everyone in this mailing list are healthy and safe!
From: Abhinay Agarwal
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 1:51 PM
To: Dirk Lemmermann
Cc: openjfx-dev
Hi Dirk,
Exactly. The TAB key press event not firing at all seems fishy.
-- Abhinay
From: Dirk Lemmermann
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 2:55 PM
To: Abhinay Agarwal
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: ComboBox keypress discrepancy
Regarding expected
: Dirk Lemmermann
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 6:39 PM
To: Abhinay Agarwal
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: ComboBox keypress discrepancy
So what info do you need? What test do you want us to run?
I ran it on MacOS X with Java 14ea and I DO NOT see the „TAB“ output.
Dirk
Am
Hi,
We have come across a behavioural change in ComboBox b/w JavaFX 8 and 9+.
We are not sure if its a regression or a bug fix which is causing it.
Therefore, I am reaching out to the community for insight.
If you run the following example, open the popup window in ComboBox and press
TAB:
?
-- Abhinay
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Abhinay
Agarwal
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 1:15 PM
To: Kevin Rushforth ; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: 8228363 Fix shifts for ContextMenu shown on TOP/LEFT side
Hi Kevin,
Yes, this is actually a pre-review mail to
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
