[RFR] JDK-8208173 bug is U+11FF return false in isComplexCharCode()

Hi, Please review following Github PR, https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/407 JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208173 Regards, Nakajima Akira

Review request for JDK-8207839, JDK-8207932, JDK-8208076 (variation selector)

Hi Kevin, Phil, Please review the following Github PR. JDK-8207839 https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/125 https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/125/files JDK-8207932 https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/126

Re: [javafxports/openjdk-jfx] JDK-8207932 : Wrong rendering of variation sequences (#126)

Hi Kevin, Sorry. I pushed to different branch, since I don't know whether it is OK to mix two different patches (for Win/Mac and for Linux). Now I pushed patch(for Linux) to this branch. Would this be right? (1) rendering variation sequences (for Win,MAC only) 55d85b5

Review Request JDK-8207932 : Wrong rendering of variation sequences

Hi, I'd like to request a review for JDK-8207932. [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207932 [2] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/126 Includes 2 patches (1) rendering variation sequences (for Win,MAC only) 55d85b5

Review-Request for JDK-8208076 (display INVISIBLE_GLYPH_ID as square box on Windows)

Hi. I'd like to request a review for JDK-8208076 [1] available as a PR [2] on the Github-Mirror. Thanks Akira Nakajima [1]https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208076 [2]https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/137 -- Company: NTT Comware

Review Request JDK-8187100 [JavaFX] To make display Variation Selectors(SVS/IVS) on Win(VISTA-) and MacOS(10.6-)

Hi All. patch: https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/126 This is separated from http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-June/022005.html and modified to simple patch for Win(VISTA or later) and MacOS(10.6 or later). I checked on Windows7 and Windows10. But I

Review Request Re: [PATCH] Fix bug to handle minus value glyph_id on Windows

: nakajima.ak...@nttcom.co.jp OLA : http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#n -- On 2018/06/27 15:02, Nakajima Akira wrote: This bug is happened on Windows. Sorry, I should use SHORTMASK instead of intMask. I re-send patch. Difference is name

Re: [PATCH] Fix bug to handle minus value glyph_id on Windows

i++; j+=step; } Thanks. Akira Nakajima On 2018/06/27 14:52, Nakajima Akira wrote: # This patch is separated from http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-June/022005.html Java issue error of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException by run following Test program on Wi

[PATCH] Fix bug to handle minus value glyph_id on Windows

# This patch is separated from http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-June/022005.html Java issue error of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException by run following Test program on Windows. This bug is that Java handles big glyph_id as minus value. For Example, Inside JavaFX, glyph_id

JDK-8187100 [PATCH][JavaFX] To make display Variation Selector(IVS/SVS/FVS)

I happened to create similar patch without knowing the report below. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187100 == Difference with following SWING patch and my JavaFX patch. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srl/8187100/webrev.00/ 1. For