I added the missing copyright header before pushing. I will file two new
issues: one to add copyright headers to all the other package.html files
(which I will do in JDK 9) and one to convert all of the package.html
files to package-info.java (which I will target to 10...I don't want to
make th
> On May 9, 2017, at 6:52 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review. We currently don't use package-info.java anywhere, but
> I can file a separate bug for converting all of our package.html to
> package-info.java.
That’d be good.
> I can add the the missing copyright headers a
Thanks for the review. We currently don't use package-info.java
anywhere, but I can file a separate bug for converting all of our
package.html to package-info.java. I can add the the missing copyright
headers at the same time.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
On May 9, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Kevin Ru
> On May 9, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> Please review the following to exclude jdk.packager module from the JDK docs
> bundle:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/
>
> I also added a missing package descr
Looks ok to me.
/Erik
On 2017-05-09 18:08, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Please review the following to exclude jdk.packager module from the
JDK docs bundle:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/
I also added a missing package descripti
Please review the following to exclude jdk.packager module from the JDK
docs bundle:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/
I also added a missing package description for the jdk.packager.services
package (in the jdk.packager.service
