On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:07:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
> the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
>
> The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
> present in `jfx17u`, so that part of the
On Mon, 9 May 2022 21:07:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
> the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
>
> The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
> present in `jfx17u`, so that part of the
Almost clean backport to `jfx17u`. Tested in connection with libffi update in
the `test-kcr-17.0.4` branch.
The only difference from the mainline patch is that the following file is not
present in `jfx17u`, so that part of the patch was skipped:
