Clean backport to jfx11u. Tested on all three platforms, along with my other
in-progress backports, all of which are aggregated in my
[`kevinrushforth:test-kcr-11.0.12`](https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx11u/commits/test-kcr-11.0.12)
branch.
-
Commit messages:
- 8262276: Debug
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:03:28 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
>> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>>
>> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
>> using a simple HelloWebView app.
>
> Arun Joseph has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:03:28 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
>> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>>
>> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
>> using a simple HelloWebView app.
>
> Arun Joseph has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:03:28 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
>> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>>
>> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
>> using a simple HelloWebView app.
>
> Arun Joseph has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge
> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>
> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
> using a simple HelloWebView app.
Arun Joseph has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits:
-
> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>
> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
> using a simple HelloWebView app.
Arun Joseph has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Fix InternalFunction crash
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:46:06 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
>> I think this is actually a lack of physical memory. I was doing tests inside
>> Windows Sandbox which has 4GB of memory by default.
>>
>> After repeating the build procedure inside VM with 16GB of memory the build
>> succeeded.
>>
>>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:55:59 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>>> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing
>>> `--info` it fails. I'll do more testing later.
>>
>> Interesting. I don't see this problem. I am able to build with or without
>> `--info`. I am also now (with this
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:41:41 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing
>> `--info` it fails. I'll do more testing later.
>
>> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing
>> `--info` it fails. I'll do more testing
Silly question, when building, at what point would any sort of memory setting
be provided? Is that a lack of enough physical memory, not enough memory based
on an environment variable or config file?
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com (mailto:ebre...@gmail.com)
> On March 9, 2021 at 12:42:05 AM
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:07:30 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing `--info`
> it fails. I'll do more testing later.
Interesting. I don't see this problem. I am able to build with or without
`--info`. I am also now (with this patch) able to
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:30:46 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
> Please let me know if I should rather discuss this through another channel
> (maybe mailing list?).
If you still have problems after resolving your "out of heap space" issue, then
asking on the
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:30:46 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>>> > The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is
>>> > the line at which the build failed (it changed from 3445 to 3453):
>>> > ...
>>> > Please let me know if you need any further information.
>>>
>>> You might be
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:20:21 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>> when passing `--info` to gradle, the build succeeds. Without passing
>> `--info` it fails. I'll do more testing later.
>
>> > The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is the
>> > line at which the build failed (it
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:07:30 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>>> The build failed again. The only difference I can spot at this time is the
>>> line at which the build failed (it changed from 3445 to 3453):
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you need any further information.
>>
>> You might be
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:06:02 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Hi dear OpenJdk team,
>>
>> At first I would like to thank you for looking into this. I am the author of
>> original `8262276` ticket.
>>
>> I would just like to share some additional information with you. I've
>> fetched and checked
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:16:51 GMT, PrimosK
wrote:
>> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>>
>> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
>> using a simple HelloWebView app.
>
> Hi dear OpenJdk team,
>
> At first I would like to thank you for looking into this.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 06:41:53 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
>
> Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
> using a simple HelloWebView app.
Hi dear OpenJdk team,
At first I would like to thank you for looking into this. I am the
Fixing the Debug build of WebKit.
Test: Build JavaFX using `-PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -PCONF=DebugNative` and test
using a simple HelloWebView app.
-
Commit messages:
- 8262276: Debug build of WebKit fails
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/417/files
Webrev:
19 matches
Mail list logo
