> return Arguments.of(string1, string2);
> }
>
>
> - END--
>
>-- Marius
>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 25. September 2021 um 15:23 Uhr
>Von: "Kevin Rushforth"
>An: "Nir Lisker" , "John Hendrikx"
>Cc: "
- END--
-- Marius
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. September 2021 um 15:23 Uhr
Von: "Kevin Rushforth"
An: "Nir Lisker" , "John Hendrikx"
Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing"
Betreff: Re: Gauging interest in updating the JavaFX test frame
I also see advantages in moving to JUnit 5, given that we can still
support both JUint 4 and JUnit 5 in the same project using
jupiter-vintage (thus avoiding the need to rewrite existing tests).
Do any other contributors have experiences with JUnit 5 that they could
share?
-- Kevin
On 9/25
I much prefer JUnit 5 to 4, so I'm in favor.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:40 AM John Hendrikx wrote:
> Posting this to gauge the interest in adding JUnit 5 as a test
> dependency to JavaFX, enabling writing tests with this new version of
> JUnit while still supporting all JUnit 4 tests.
>
> A draf
