On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:21:52 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> John Neffenger has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
>> commits
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 22:21:36 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> Fixes [JDK-8201568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201568).
>
> John Neffenger has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:47:54 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> I don't have access to a Pi right now, so I can't test this (I'll be able to
>> test in about 10 days from now though)
>
> @johanvos, would you mind approving this pull request again? It looks as if
> the *ready* label was removed
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:34:29 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> Based on my notes below, I believe this change is safe for any Linux input
>> device driver because the driver shouldn't
>> receive the intermediate *open* and *close* calls at all.
>> Nonetheless, it would be reassuring if someone
> Fixes [JDK-8201568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201568).
John Neffenger has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev
excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request
contains two additional
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:49:33 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> Nonetheless, it would be reassuring if someone could try [this
> change](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/258/files)
> just once on a mainstream device, such as the Raspberry Pi with a touchscreen
> LCD panel.
I just placed an
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:05:02 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>>> By the way, do you know whether I would be able to use a PinePhone
>>
>> I have been trying to run JavaFX on the PinePhone ever since I got it. The
>> OS I'm using is Fedora and it is aarch64,
>> which means I had to add that arch to
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:26:44 GMT, Tor (torbuntu)
wrote:
> Is there somewhere I can find an embedded aarch64 version?
If I had a PinePhone, I would try to get the 32-bit *armhf* build of JavaFX
working. That's the one you build with
`gradle -PCOMPILE_TARGETS=armv6hf sdk jmod`. You may need to
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:35:01 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> By the way, do you know whether I would be able to use a PinePhone
I have been trying to run JavaFX on the PinePhone ever since I got it. The OS
I'm using is Fedora and it is aarch64,
which means I had to add that arch to build.gradle to
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:10:23 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> I don't have access to a Pi right now, so I can't test this (I'll be able to
> test in about 10 days from now though)
Thank you, Johan. If you have the time, that would be great. Otherwise, merging
this for early-access builds of JavaFX
16
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:49:33 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> The rationale makes sense (open/open/close) instead of (open/close/open)
>
> Based on my notes below, I believe this change is safe for any Linux input
> device driver because the driver shouldn't
> receive the intermediate *open* and
The message from this sender included one or more files
which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not
open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent.
--
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:26:50 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:21:06 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> Fixes [JDK-8201568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201568).
The rationale makes sense (open/open/close) instead of (open/close/open)
-
Marked as reviewed by jvos (Reviewer).
PR:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:21:06 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> Fixes [JDK-8201568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201568).
I thought I could avoid fixing this bug simply by waiting a few years, but the
old devices from 2012 and 2013 where the
problem occurs are still supported and still
14 matches
Mail list logo
