Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-09-14 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Assuming your test program is in the unnamed module (meaning it is run from a jar file or directory of classes on the classpath), the following will work: java -XaddExports:javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui=ALL-UNNAMED -- Kevin Benjamin Gudehus wrote: >And we will certainly need to use thi

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-09-12 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
>And we will certainly need to use this for our own unit testing, too. Details are tbd, but you will be able to use it for testing. Anything new about the command line switch to access Robot? :) --Benjamin

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-11 Thread Kevin Rushforth
enjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" Date:08/07/2015 05:51 AM Subject: Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9 Sent by:"openjfx-dev" -- Hi Jonathan, thanks for the summary! pull

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-11 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Anyone can create a bug here: http://bugs.java.com/ No, it isn't the same as having direct access to JIRA, but the bugs will end up in the same bug database. -- Kevin Benjamin Gudehus wrote: It would be good to discuss this via a JBS issue. Please file one and we can discuss logistic

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-11 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
>It would be good to discuss this via a JBS issue. Please file one and we can discuss logistics further. I have no project author status on JBS to create an issue. :/ I could sign the Oracle Contributor Agreement, but I doubt I will able provide the two required non-trivial patches anytime soon in

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-11 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
ch > in Java 9 that would grant TestFX access to internals? > > > Neil > > > > > From:Benjamin Gudehus > To:jonathan.gi...@oracle.com, > Cc:"openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" > Date: 08/07/2015 05:51 AM > Su

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-10 Thread Hervé girod
Thanks, I will ! :-) Sent from my iPad > On 11 août 2015, at 00:33, Jonathan Giles wrote: > > It is likely that these classes will be included as part of JEP 253 (in > subproject 3), so they will likely become public API. Javadoc output for this > subproject will be posted in the next week or

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-10 Thread Jonathan Giles
On 7/08/2015 9:51 p.m., Benjamin Gudehus wrote: Hi Jonathan, thanks for the summary! >pull up your sleeves and work with us to get the API into a shape where it is good enough to commit to as public API I'd like to help with the public API for profiling and performance tracking (mainly Pul

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-10 Thread Jonathan Giles
It is likely that these classes will be included as part of JEP 253 (in subproject 3), so they will likely become public API. Javadoc output for this subproject will be posted in the next week or two. Keep your eyes peeled :-) -- Jonathan On 11/08/2015 4:42 a.m., Hervé girod wrote: It passed

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-10 Thread Hervé girod
It passed under my radar that we use classes in com.sun.javafx.css, and com.sun.javafx.css.parser, mainly : - CSSParser - Stylesheet - Selector - Rule The use case is to be able to process JavaFX stylesheets properties. Hervé Sent from my iPad > On 7 août 2015, at 01:10, Jonathan Giles wrote:

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-07 Thread Mike Hearn
If there were to be an API for getting basic graphics device data, what would that look like and would it be hard to write? My app uses some internal APIs not listed above to query the pixel scale and whether we're using software/hardware graphics, to reduce usage of some expensive effects. These

Re: Results of review of private JavaFX API for consideration to make public in JDK 9

2015-08-07 Thread Benjamin Gudehus
Hi Jonathan, thanks for the summary! >pull up your sleeves and work with us to get the API into a shape where it is good enough to commit to as public API I'd like to help with the public API for profiling and performance tracking (mainly PulseLogger, maybe PerformanceTracker). >These classes a