I agree. Please file a bug.
-- Kevin
Tom Eugelink wrote:
Indeed, this exception put me on the wrong track, trying to figure out
why the test was failing based on the exception, while I was "just"
asserting the wrong property.
I now also understand what it is trying to tell me. And I must ag
Indeed, this exception put me on the wrong track, trying to figure out why the test was
failing based on the exception, while I was "just" asserting the wrong property.
I now also understand what it is trying to tell me. And I must agree with Mike;
given that the renderer is terminated, and it
Race free shutdown in multi-threaded programs is always very hard. At
Google some programs and libraries simply didn't support it: for servers,
the cost in terms of bugs and extra code was deemed to outweigh the
benefits, so the only "supported" way for a process to end was for it to be
killed.
Ja
Yes, it happens during unit testing (TestFX) but only with this skin. I have a
hundred of other tests on a dozen controls that do not throw any exception.
On 3-8-2015 18:13, Herve Girod wrote:
I often have this exception when I interrupt Unit tests forcefully in NetBeans
if the JavaFX platfor
I often have this exception when I interrupt Unit tests forcefully in
NetBeans if the JavaFX platform has been started in the Unit Tests
2015-08-03 16:10 GMT+02:00 Tom Eugelink :
> Working on a new skin for JFXtras Agenda... What is JavaFX trying to tell
> me with this exception?
>
> java.util.co
Working on a new skin for JFXtras Agenda... What is JavaFX trying to tell me
with this exception?
java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task
com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRenderJob@33cf88 rejected from
com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer@1133212[Terminated, pool size = 0,
ac
