Looking a bit deeper into it, it seems there are some related issues that
might be caused by the same root cause, or by this fix.
I'll request to backport it once we have more insight about the potential
regressions.
- Johan
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:47 PM Johan Vos wrote:
> I'm ok with the
I'm ok with the backport, as long as the patch applies clean -- which it
most likely does, as I don't think we have other changes in that file.
- Johan
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:15 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> > JDK-8193502
>
> Johan can comment on whether he wants to backport it. As noted
> JDK-8193502
Johan can comment on whether he wants to backport it. As noted below,
someone reported a regression associated with it when using gtk2, but we
don't have a bug filed or a test case.
> It might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.
Not sure what you mean since
Could JavaFX 11 also get backported the fix related for JDK-8193502? It
might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.
I noticed this regression right after JDK 9 build 161. Recently also JavaFX
8 got this regression after update 181.
It seems this was fixed in JavaFX 13.
I asked on GitHub
+1
-- Kevin
On 10/21/2019 3:16 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I request permission to backport the following issues to the jfx-11
repository. All patches apply clean or with minor changes (e.g.
build.properties must keep jfx.release.major.version to 11)
Thanks,
- Johan
Hi Kevin,
I request permission to backport the following issues to the jfx-11
repository. All patches apply clean or with minor changes (e.g.
build.properties must keep jfx.release.major.version to 11)
Thanks,
- Johan
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221302 : Upgrade to gcc 8.2 on
