Chien, Kevin, guys,
Please review fix for next issue:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130381
WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ekleyman/8130381/
Thanks,
Elina
Kevin, could you please review:
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddhill/8147427
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147427
--
David Hill
Java Embedded Development
"A man's feet should be planted in his country, but his eyes should survey the
world."
--
Hello, I'm sure this has already been answered before in this list, but is it
planned to move the existing traversal sub-system (focus system) to a public
API for JDK 9?
Hervé
Sent from my iPad
Yes, it is something that Leif is exploring for JDK 9. It is not a hard
commitment, but is something we are trying to get into JDK 9. See here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091673
-- Jonathan
On 17/02/16 11:10 AM, Hervé Girod wrote:
Hello, I'm sure this has already been answered
[I believe you sent this to the wrong mailing list - the "-request" list
is for changing your membership to the mailing list, not for sending
mail to the list itself. I fixed it here in my reply...]
That looks fine. I'll note that the "dashCumulative" variable does not
need to be computed
Thanks for the information!
2/16 11:10 AM, Hervé Girod wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm sure this has already been answered before in this list, but
>> is it planned to move the existing traversal sub-system (focus system) to a
>> public API for JDK 9?
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>
>
Jim and Alexander,
Please review the following fix to allow JFXPanel to compile (and run)
again on JDK 9.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149967
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8149967/webrev.00/
Note that I did not provide a fallback to the existing JDK 8 method,
since we are
[resend with correct subject line]
Jim and Alexander,
Please review the following fix to allow JFXPanel to compile (and run)
again on JDK 9.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149967
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8149967/webrev.00/
Note that I did not provide a fallback to the
I added a comment on the bug about BC, but it sounds like you already
considered it. I'm fine with this as is, but would push for moving to
JDK9 ASAP...
...jim
On 2/16/2016 3:49 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
[resend with correct subject line]
Jim and Alexander,
Please
Hi Kevin and Jonathan,
Please review the proposed fix and the detail of the fix is recorded in
the JIRA:
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137252
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8137252/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
10 matches
Mail list logo