Re: Follow-on bugs

Am 29.11.16 um 01:09 schrieb Jim Graham: With respect to float/double, I have another bug somewhere where we have a large inaccuracy for a very large circle that intersects the viewing area along only a very tiny portion. The errors get especially bad with dashing because we iterate each das

[9] Code Review Request For 8170421: Ensemble8 black flash at startup on b145+

Jim or Kevin, Please review this simple fix posted in the JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170421 Thanks, - Chien

Re: Follow-on bugs

Hi Laurent, I think you've looked into the issues of flatness and how inflection points affect it about as much as I have at this point. I'm not sure that sub-dividing at min/max values helps filling, but a way to subdivide at inflection points might improve the flattening algorithm. It's wor

Re: Follow-on bugs

Jim, There is one thing I think you should look at, though, and I wasn't sure if > I should file a bug. If you've downloaded the Rasterization verifier from > the old JBS bug for non-AA rendering, try running it with the 4quads mode > (-quad argument I think). It looks like it averages slightly

[9] Review request: JDK-8170295 fx:jvmarg is not set

Victor, Please review this change to fix setting of jvmarg options: JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170295 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cbensen/JDK-8170295/webrev.00/ Chris

[9] Review request: JDK-8170122 Packager Tests

Victor, Please review these Java Packager examples: JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170122 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cbensen/JDK-8170122/webrev.01/ Chris

[9] Review request: JDK-8166281: -Bidentifier="" not working for modules in MAC

Chris, Please review the changes about fixing the -Bidentifier for backward compatibility: JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166281 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vdrozdov/JDK-8166281/webrev.00/ --Victor

Re: Hmm, another attempt to get information on deploying javax.script (via FXMLLoader) and SceneBuilder and javax.script languages ...

Dalibor, thank you very much for this link, just posted a comparable question there. Poking around the questions (many unanswered) posted there, my hopes are not very high to get an answer (maybe I am too pessimistic here)... Again, thank you! ---rony On 28.11.2016 13:43, dalibor topic wrote

Re: Hmm, another attempt to get information on deploying javax.script (via FXMLLoader) and SceneBuilder and javax.script languages ...

On 28.11.2016 12:55, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: So I am wondering whether there is another mailing group (other than this one) where questions like this can be asked There is a JavaFX forum at https://community.oracle.com/community/java/java_desktop/javafx_2.0_and_later within the Oracle Com

Hmm, another attempt to get information on deploying javax.script (via FXMLLoader) and SceneBuilder and javax.script languages ...

Quite a while ago I asked about javax.script deployments in JavaFX (i.e. when instrumentating javax.script languages when FXMLLoader processes FXML files) without getting any answer or pointer so far. So I am wondering whether there is another mailing group (other than this one) where questions

Re: Optimised, high-performance, multi-threaded rendering pipeline

Sorry, the "agreed" comment was meant to be a reply to you Tobi. Pity not everyone "agrees"... > On 28 Nov. 2016, at 19:10, Tobi wrote: > > We should discuss a new rendering pipeline on the openjfx mailing list. It’s > not off topic - it’s an important topic for the future of JavaFX. > > >>

Re: Optimised, high-performance, multi-threaded rendering pipeline

Agreed. > On 28 Nov. 2016, at 19:08, Michael Paus wrote: > >> Am 28.11.16 um 08:51 schrieb Felix Bembrick: >> Great - good to see interest growing. >> >> Especially given that you work for Oracle, right? > Sorry, if I have to disappoint you on that but I do not work for Oracle. > I run my own l

Re: Optimised, high-performance, multi-threaded rendering pipeline

No disappointment, no surprises. It was a rhetorical question... > On 28 Nov. 2016, at 19:08, Michael Paus wrote: > >> Am 28.11.16 um 08:51 schrieb Felix Bembrick: >> Great - good to see interest growing. >> >> Especially given that you work for Oracle, right? > Sorry, if I have to disappoint

Re: Optimised, high-performance, multi-threaded rendering pipeline

We should discuss a new rendering pipeline on the openjfx mailing list. It’s not off topic - it’s an important topic for the future of JavaFX. > Am 28.11.2016 um 06:54 schrieb Felix Bembrick : > > Sorry Gerrit - you did indeed. > > Maybe you'd also like to participate in the offline discussion

Re: Optimised, high-performance, multi-threaded rendering pipeline

Am 28.11.16 um 08:51 schrieb Felix Bembrick: Great - good to see interest growing. Especially given that you work for Oracle, right? Sorry, if I have to disappoint you on that but I do not work for Oracle. I run my own little company and are the head of the Java User Group Stuttgart.