Re: OpenJFX initiative

2017-09-24 Thread John-Val Rose
Hi Mark, I didn't actually "describe a proposed roadmap"; I merely questioned why there doesn't appear to be one. What does that mean? Well, it could mean that one exists but that Oracle prefers to not make it public. It could mean that their still developing one. Or it could mean that the

AW: OpenJFX initiative

2017-09-24 Thread Thorsten Fischer
+1 I‘d too like to see some (coordinated) movement in the JavaFX area. Greetings & have a nice weekend, Thorsten Von: John-Val Rose Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. September 2017 12:43 An: Mark Fortner Cc: Nir Lisker; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing Betreff: Re: OpenJFX initiative Hi Mark, I

Re: OpenJFX initiative

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Paus
Am 23.09.17 um 16:14 schrieb Mark Fortner: I must have missed the bit where you described a proposed roadmap. Me too. I think for the most part I've seen JavaFX used as a means of keeping older Swing-based projects alive. In the enterprise, those projects are dwindling, in part because people