This was turned off long time ago to avoid spam and upload of viruses.
What I don't understand is why people who e.g. filed 10bug reports or
made 10 comments, asked for upload permission at this very list, ...
don't get the possibility.
Another option would be to only allow patches / text files.
I suppose „legal reasons“….
For me it’s very frustrating to see every year the same procedure:
JavaFX-iOS/Android related tracks were canceled - „nerd“ stuff like Rasp.PI,
DukePad Co were announced. Maybe I’m really the only one who needs JavaFX on
mobile to use JavaFX on desktop as well… :(
No, you are *not* the only one. We *all* need it. In fact, without it
happening soon, JavaFX is already dead.
But let's not give up yet. Perhaps it's closer than we know. I am a glass half
full kinda guy :-)
On 30 Sep 2013, at 16:40, Tobias Bley t...@ultramixer.com wrote:
I suppose
I don’t understand why „all“ this people who needs JavaFX on iOS/Android does
not tell it Oracles management. And I don’t understand why all this people use
their time to develop all this demos and Rasp.PI stuff. Who needs it? Why don’t
we develop base stuff like iOS skins, Android skins,
I am sure Oracle management get it. There are lots of issues here, not just
technical. I am sure they want to get it perfect before they announce
anything. Let's hope that's why nothing has eventuated yet...
On 30 Sep 2013, at 17:04, Tobias Bley t...@ultramixer.com wrote:
I don’t
The lack of information on iOS/Android is a major bummer, but this also
highlights a deeper problem here.
We have a situation where Oracle won't talk to this community because the
topic is important, it's too big a game changer for them to comment on.
It's tied in with share prices, and market
I absolutely agree Daniel. I opened a very important bug reporting concerning
JFX performance on iPhone which currently prevents using JavaFX (and RoboVM) to
build apps for the iPhone (https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-31453) this
bug report is open since 3(!) month! How shall the
I'm also optimistic. We've all seen that it's possible from the technical
side… I think it takes quite some time to get legal approvement inside Oracle
to show something. Probably those guys simply didn't get their talks legally
approved in time.
BTW: There's a new implementation of JavaFX
If you add the pieces of information together (announced and then
shortly cancelled J1 talks), you perfectly get the right picture.
The *problem* certainly is not the technical part.
While I disagree that the RPi is just nerd stuff (the embedded market
is huge), I agree however that any further
Yes but the point is: that has nothing to do with a real „JavaFX community“.
Am 30.09.2013 um 10:03 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com:
I am sure Oracle management get it. There are lots of issues here, not
just technical. I am sure they want to get it perfect before they
Performance differs depending on the browser. bck2brwsr is heavily optimized
for Chrome. The demos I've seen are running with 40-50FPS on Chrome but much
slower in Firefox. Performance on Chrome seemed definitely good enough to
create normal applications. Being aware that some things are not
I urge everyone *not* to walk away from JavaFX, at least not yet.
As has been pointed out, there were several sessions scheduled for J1
relating to JavaFX on mobiles and tablets that were only cancelled at the
very last minute. I see this as a definite positive. To me that says that
they truly
Pardon? It’s not allowed to discuss with the JavaFX community the future of the
technology and community in their mailing list??? What’s up Hervé?
Am 30.09.2013 um 12:03 schrieb Hervé Girod herve.gi...@gmail.com:
It's not the place to talk politics here. If you want to channel your
Yes, perhaps Oracle have not yet grasped the degree of importance of
actively engaging the community in a project that is supposed to be
community-based.
I suspect the limited resources of the JavaFX team are working flat-out
just to get new versions released and to meet the targets for JFX8 and
Agree, this would make posting SSCCE so much easier, I always have to
plain write them into the description of the bug report, which is ugly...
Kind regards,
Sebastian Rheinnecker
Am 30.09.2013 08:26, schrieb Tom Schindl:
This was turned off long time ago to avoid spam and upload of viruses.
+1
On 30 September 2013 20:25, Sebastian Rheinnecker
sebastian.rheinnec...@yworks.com wrote:
Agree, this would make posting SSCCE so much easier, I always have to
plain write them into the description of the bug report, which is ugly...
Kind regards,
Sebastian Rheinnecker
Am 30.09.2013
Yes, but they use that for ADF mobile.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Tobias Bley t...@ultramixer.com wrote:
Does Oracle really has an AOT based JVM for iOS and Android?
Am 30.09.2013 um 11:16 schrieb Udo Rader list...@bestsolution.at:
If you add the pieces of information together
I don’t think you. ADF mobile uses HTML5 as frontend, so there is no need to
execute JavaFX code on the client… maybe there is a J2ME based VM in ADF (like
Codename One do)
Am 30.09.2013 um 13:58 schrieb Ali Ebrahimi ali.ebrahimi1...@gmail.com:
Yes, but they use that for ADF mobile.
On
Hi,
@Felix: you are kidding are you? We cannot take another breath without choking
on it. Sure there
are many positive things about JavaFX but in the real world I can't be happy
over and over again about
the same things. A university can just devlop until a certain point, but we
have a
Changeset: 0148423079ac
Author:Lubomir Nerad lubomir.ne...@oracle.com
Date: 2013-09-30 14:09 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/0148423079ac
Reverted accidental part of fix for RT-29891
!
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:48:10 +0200, Felix Bembrick
felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
I urge everyone *not* to walk away from JavaFX, at least not yet.
As has been pointed out, there were several sessions scheduled for J1
relating to JavaFX on mobiles and tablets that were only cancelled at the
Changeset: af515f1eeb5d
Author:tb115823 tomas.branda...@oracle.com
Date: 2013-09-30 15:55 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/af515f1eeb5d
Android: Use lens multitouch and gestures support.
!
Ok thx, than I will wait until there is this tooling support for JavaFX as well.
Am 30.09.2013 um 16:43 schrieb Anton Epple toni.ep...@eppleton.de:
bck2brwsr has really good tooling, and you can get started in less than an
hour. Here is a tutorial:
Hi guys,
I understand your frustration about the cancelled sessions, and I share it.
But when I talk to the engineers and see their posts here, they're clearly
interested in the same stuff we'd like to see in JavaFX. I guess nobody was
more frustrated that these sessions were cancelled than
For those without JBS accounts what is the right web site to use to
report bugs?
FX does not use JBS -- we have a separate JIRA instance. Your question
is probably best asked on an OpenJDK alias.
-- Kevin
Pete Brunet wrote:
For those without JBS accounts what is the right web site to use to
report bugs?
Sorry for the spam Kevin. Yes, I asked this on the wrong list.
On 9/30/13 10:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
FX does not use JBS -- we have a separate JIRA instance. Your question
is probably best asked on an OpenJDK alias.
-- Kevin
Pete Brunet wrote:
For those without JBS accounts what is
Hello Matthias,
This is just how Oracle rolls, we have to get used to it. And actually it is
not that bad of an attitude; never make a promise you can't keep. When deliver,
deliver well. I'm in a project which communicates way to much to end users and
they keep being disappointed. I kinda
On 30/09/2013 17:38, Anton Epple wrote:
Hi guys,
I understand your frustration about the cancelled sessions, and I share it.
But when I talk to the engineers and see their posts here, they're clearly
interested in the same stuff we'd like to see in JavaFX. I guess nobody was
more
On 2013-09-30 18:27, John Hendrikx wrote:
To be honest, it is likely JavaFX already missed its window to become relevant on Android and iOS.
Maybe, but I've done my fair share of UI toolkits and JFX really has some great
features compared to the others (not counting layout - pun intended
2. Wow, there is a JavaFX enabled Dukepad. Beeing a soldering nerd myself,
hacking firmware and much cool stuff
in my spare time it really kicked me in the first place. Then I grounded when
I have seen that it was a childish puzzle
with lego blocks.
What?
The longer I think about that,
I suggest posting your SSCCE on gist and linking to it from the bug report:
https://gist.github.com/
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Felix Bembrick
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 3:28 AM
To:
Hello Cinta,
Sorry for the delay. JavaOne madness.
I just ran your code on Windows 7 with an nVidia card with no issues.
Can you file a Jira and describe your build and what version of javafx
you are using?
Also, paste the code from your email.
@Matthias, no, I am not kidding. Put your faith in the technology, not the
politics.
On 30 Sep 2013, at 22:03, Matthias Hänel hae...@ultramixer.com wrote:
Hi,
@Felix: you are kidding are you? We cannot take another breath without
choking on it. Sure there
are many positive things
@John, I do not believe it is too late for JavaFX on mobiles and tablets.
It is a far better UI toolkit and platform than anything else available on
those devices so if Oracle can get it to work well there then we are looking at
a potential world beater :-)
On 1 Oct 2013, at 2:27, John
Cool, thanks John!
I suggest posting your SSCCE on gist and linking to it from the bug report:
https://gist.github.com/
--
Pedro Duque Vieira
I'm not an apologist for Oracle, but in their defense, I can't see any
commercial company telegraphing their punches by pre-announcing technology.
If you want support for those platforms, feel free fork the codebase and
write it. I'd be satisified if we could get high-priority bugs and
Changeset: 88a48547ab6c
Author:jgiles
Date: 2013-09-27 14:07 +1200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/controls/rt/rev/88a48547ab6c
RT-32592: CSS: Table header render is incorrectly when set style -fx-border-*
from Platform.runLater
Reviewed-by: psomashe
!
Changeset: a984a34eca51
Author:rbair
Date: 2013-09-30 14:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/a984a34eca51
[DOC ONLY] RT-31687: Some concurrent package classes have empty javadocs
Partial fix
!
Changeset: 50c8083b3df6
Author:Felipe Heidrich felipe.heidr...@oracle.com
Date: 2013-09-30 19:35 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/50c8083b3df6
RT-33194: Wrapping width affects not always
!
40 matches
Mail list logo