[8u40] review request: RT-39424 center of pixel sampling for non-AA rendering

2014-11-21 Thread Jim Graham
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~flar/RT-39424/webrev.00/ Jira: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-39424 Note that curves still show a lot of errors due to RT-39439. Those will be fixed by work on the "BND" constants in a separate fix... ...jim

[8u40] review request: RT-39000: Exceptions in sandboxed app when dragging text within WebView

2014-11-21 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Anton (or Leonid), Please review the following simple fix: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-39000 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/RT-39000/webrev.00/ Thanks. -- Kevin

PLEASE READ: FX 9-dev repo is now open

2014-11-21 Thread Kevin Rushforth
OpenJFX Developers: I am pleased to announce that the OpenJFX 9-dev repo [1] is now open. As with FX 8, there is a corresponding master repo, but developers should pull from 9-dev just as is currently done for 8u-dev. Here are the rules of engagement. They are also posted on the OpenJFK Wiki

[8u40] Code Review Request For RT-39455: Remove unused ShapeUtil.rasterizeGlyphOutline method and relevant prism settings

2014-11-21 Thread Chien Yang
Hi Jim, Phil or Kevin, Please review the proposed fix posted in this JIRA: JIRA: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-39455 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/RT-39455/webrev.00/ Thanks, - Chien

In(Sanity) Testing Mondays

2014-11-21 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
Reminder, Monday is our weekly sanity testing. You can find your testing assignment at: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Sanity+Testing Also please remember that the repo will be locked from 1am PST until 1pm PST. Happy testing! Thanks, Vadim

Re: Possible new project: OpenJDK LaF

2014-11-21 Thread Mario Torre
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 12:04 +0200, Mario Torre wrote: > On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:03 +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > I think a move to GTK 3 would eliminate a class of java/Linux desktop > > issues we run across today. My concern would be the long term maintenance > > of this piece... Given no fu