Re: Fwd: Re: Marlin-Renderer and JavaFX

2016-11-03 Thread Jim Graham
There are basically 2 isolated changes to the existing code base and then a set of added source files. The first change is to use Marlin if the appropriate property is specified, and those changes are very localized and easy to verify that they won't hurt anything. The second change is to mo

Re: Fwd: Re: Marlin-Renderer and JavaFX

2016-11-03 Thread Jim Graham
We currently control the configuration logging with prism.verbose, and we already have a place in PrismSettings where we dump out the configuration including which rasterizer we're using (native or java-based) if verbose is set. We should probably consolidate this along with the TODO to move t

Re: Fwd: Re: Marlin-Renderer and JavaFX

2016-11-03 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Hi Laurent, Great progress. I agree with Sergey about avoiding unconditional logging, and about wanting a different name for the property (work with Jim on the property name). To answer a couple other questions: Does it look acceptable as a low risk RFE ? I would need to see the final di