Hi, Alexander.
How can we be sure that the parent frame will not be disposed while we
use a pointer?
long ownerWindowPtr = peer.getOverridenWindowHandle();
< Dispose the peer
if (ownerWindowPtr != 0) {
//Place window above JavaFX stage
CWrapper.NSWindow.addChildWindow(
ownerWind
Hi, Prasanta.
On 9/19/17 22:26, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi, Prasanta.
- In this version it is unclear what is a purpose of the
"fxCheckSequenceThread.start()". This code will start the thread and
will continue execution, it will not wait when the thread will stop.
- The DefaultKeyboardFocu
Probably, but JEPs can take a lot of time from start to finish and time is
itself perhaps the biggest enemy that JavaFX is facing.
And how many JEPs are being initiated by the Oracle JavaFX team
themselves? I mean for the specific purpose of *true* innovation?
On 23 September 2017 at 10:24, Nir
I don't have any answer to those questions. A JEP is the only thing I can
think of.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:19 AM, John-Val Rose
wrote:
> Yes, well I'm sure there's a lot of truth to that as Johan has
> demonstrated.
>
> But, I think it's a bit of an over simplification.
>
> How do I know if *
Yes, well I'm sure there's a lot of truth to that as Johan has demonstrated.
But, I think it's a bit of an over simplification.
How do I know if *my* innovation (of say 9 months of effort) is "high-quality
code that makes OpenJFX better"?
I can do my best to write high-quality code but what exac
> What do you mean by “go with Johan Vos’s experience”?
What he said here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2017-September/020801.html
.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:08 AM, John-Val Rose
wrote:
> The concept of “innovation” no longer seems to apply to JavaFX, at least
> not from
I need to look more closely but at a quick glance I don't see any
problems so a tentative +1 ..
but a final +1 will go in the bug.
Have you tested the various configurations .. running this on top of
current JDK (not FX) 10
both with and without the FX changes ?
-phil.
On 09/21/2017 10:56 PM
The concept of “innovation” no longer seems to apply to JavaFX, at least not
from Oracle’s perspective.
If you read the official list of changes in the just-released Java 9, AWT (yes,
AWT) has more changes than JavaFX and even then the only significant change is
to make it Jigsaw compatible.
A
Hi All,
Please review a fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/fx/8187781/webrev.00/
for fx issue
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187781
More info in JBS.
Regards
Prasanta
I didn't see any update on the idea for our initiative. Are we still
waiting for a reply from Oracle or do we go with Johan Vos's experience?
I think that the least we can do without putting any work into this is have
a semi-formal list of people who would like to work on this and a list of
what
10 matches
Mail list logo
