Greetings,
When performing an OpenJFX build from hg tag 8u131b11 the build fails
on
> Execution failed for task ':apps:appsJarLinux'.
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>
[fixed subject line]
The freeze for the last planned integration prior to RDP2 will be on
1/15/2018 (end of the day Pacific time), so this is the deadline. RDP2
starts on 1/18/2018. See the jdk10 project page [1] for all JDK 10 dates.
I hope to fix at least a first pass of the build
I am not trying to create an OpenJFX repository that is maintained to any
degree
But, in my work on the Robot API I also went ahead and created the
necessary
infrastructure to get OpenJFX building on Appveyor (Windows continuous
integration) and Travis CI (both Linux and macOS continuious
Kevin,
I wouldn't mind pushing javadoc changes into 10, but don't have OpenJFX
built yet as I'm waiting for updated instructions on that. Can you tell
when is RDP1 ending and when is it planned to update the build instructions
so I'll know what my time window is?
Thanks,
Nir
On Fri, Dec 15,
Phil,
Please review the following to remove the check for the existence of
'javah':
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193636
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8193636/webrev.00/
Thanks.
-- Kevin
FYI...
--- Begin Message ---
Per the JDK 10 schedule [1], we are now in Rampdown Phase One. The
overall feature set is frozen. No further JEPs will be targeted to
this release.
The goal of this phase is the same as it was for JDK 9: Ensure that we
fix the bugs that need to be fixed, and
To: OpenJFX Committers
As you should have seen from the message I forwarded from Mark Reinhold,
the JDK 10 RDP1 (proposed) rules have been posted.
During RDP1 there is no additional approval needed, beyond the usual
code review, to push the following types of fixes:
* P1-P3 bugs [1]
*
It’s been noted that my previous email was very much in the “TL;DR” category.
I’m sorry about that.
I guess I just had a lot to say and feel very passionate about JavaFX.
Graciously,
John-Val Rose
Android’de Yahoo Postadan gönderildi
Hi,
first of all I would like to say that I fully agree with everything that
has been
said so far in this thread and I am glad that someone is pushing this long
overdue discussion. Please find my comments inline.
Am 15.12.17 um 10:09 schrieb John-Val Rose:
[...]
This initiative/team/group
Dear all,
Chris' email has similarly motivated me to post for the first time.
I work with a small a 6 person team developing a proprietary distributed
software platform. The GUI is another 'node' or 'engine' on the graph of
interconnected processes. It provides a large number of different
Dear all,
Chris mail motivated me to answer too.
*** For *your* situation, what is JavaFX, how do you want it to evolve and
what does it mean to you? ***
I am developping for 10 years scientific desktop apps with Java Swing (+
Java Web Start).
As our users are mostly using linux & macOS, we
Thanks for that extensive and very insightful response Chris.
Let me make something very clear, just in case people have the wrong idea:
I am not here to complain, stir-up trouble or to criticise anyone. In
fact, I greatly admire the JavaFX team at Oracle and what they are managing
to achieve
13 matches
Mail list logo
