Hi Semyon,
Could you please review the changes (also have a look at Phil's comment in
trailing mail) and let me know your comments.
Thanks Kevin and Phil. I have incorporated the changes suggested for unit tests
in JavaFx side. Request you to have a look.
Please find updated webrev at -
Hi Kevin,
My bad, I didn't look carefully at "Fix Version" in the JIRA record.
Yes, the subject of the email is misleading. Should I resend it with the
proper subject?
- Alexey
On 1/17/2018 6:30 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
I see that this bug was (correctly) targeted for 11 and not for 10.
I see that this bug was (correctly) targeted for 11 and not for 10. I
guess the subject line is wrong?
-- Kevin
Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Victor,
Please review my changes for fixing the issue: "JDK-8195075: Old app
window is not reactivatable"
JIRA:
Victor,
Please review my changes for fixing the issue: "JDK-8195075: Old app
window is not reactivatable"
JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195075
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asemenyuk/8195075/webrev.00/
- Alexey
I think you mean https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187803 for
the AWT/Swing side...
-- Kevin
Phil Race wrote:
The AWT/Swing side of this needs to be bug
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185634
One thing I notice is that in XWindowPeer.java the calculation for the
value of
The AWT/Swing side of this needs to be bug
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185634
One thing I notice is that in XWindowPeer.java the calculation for the
value of transientForWindow
is different .. because you don't have the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021961 :
Hi Dipak,
To underscore the fact that the AWT part of the change has to be pushed
under a separate bug ID I have modified the subject line.
The FX half of the implementation changes look fine. I tested it on
Linux and it works as expected. There are two problems with the unit tests:
1. The
