Hi Laurent and Phil,
Please review the following fix:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195801
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8195801/webrev.00/
This removes the dependency on the internal jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe
class, and goes back to using sun.misc.Unsafe, which is still
> In the end, we link all static libs + object files in a single
executable.
I see. I had missed that you said "libjavafx_iio.a", meaning static
linking. No, I don't know how to make that work, either. Name mangling
might be the best solution then.
-- Kevin
Johan Vos wrote:
At the risk
At the risk of being stupid, but I don't see how I could make the JPEG
symbols invisible, as they are still needed by the native functions in
javafx_iio (in jpegloader.c).
If they are invisible, jpegloader.o won't be able to access them either,
no? In the end, we link all static libs + object
Ah, I see. Then yes, just removing the old ones is fine.
As for the larger question, unless there are dependencies on apps, you
can assume that the only ones you care about are the ones created by
"gradle sdk".
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
So this is why I was asking about the optional
So this is why I was asking about the optional stuff: 'graphics' module has
BOTH
build/resources/jsl-decora
build/resources/jsl-prism
and
build/gensrc/jsl-decora
build/gensrc/jsl-prism
That led me to think that when the new dependencies were added the old ones
weren't removed. Those that
One more thing about the specific path you mentioned as not being there.
path="build/resources/jsl-decora"/>
path="build/resources/jsl-prism"/>
These are still being created by 'gradle sdk', but the path is wrong
(the files moved in JDK 9) and should be:
build/gensrc/jsl-decora
Nir Lisker wrote:
Iv'e removed all the classpath dependencies that were causing errors.
I don't mind sorting out the rest of the files while at it, though for
that there are a few things I'm not sure about:
1. Some dependencies are marked as optional and as such they don't
cause errors,
Iv'e removed all the classpath dependencies that were causing errors. I
don't mind sorting out the rest of the files while at it, though for that
there are a few things I'm not sure about:
1. Some dependencies are marked as optional and as such they don't cause
errors, but they are still missing.
Now available here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196130
You can send me your patch and I'll review / push it.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
Submitted 9052392 to fix Eclipse config files.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Kevin Rushforth