Summary
---
* Simplify and update the Gtk glass backend, making Linux a first-class OpenJFX
platform.
PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/77
Goals
-
* Make Linux a first-class OpenJFX platform (see Motivation);
* Simplify the code and reduce it's size;
* Update to gtk3 (it was
> ### Summary
> * Simplify and update the Gtk glass backend, making Linux a first-class
> OpenJFX platform.
>
> ### Goals
> * Make Linux a first-class OpenJFX platform (see Motivation);
> * Simplify the code and reduce it's size;
> * Update to gtk3 (it was originally a port from gtk2);
> *
Hi Kevin,
On 03.04.2020 01:21, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I see that you updated the PR and sent it for review.
>
> Before we formally review it in the PR, let's finish the discussion as to
> whether this is a useful
> feature, and if so, what form this feature should take.
>
> From my point of
On 04.04.2020 03:25, Eric Bresie wrote:
> Are you behind a proxy? I had problems with another application which
> required registering certificates and related credentials keys to be added
> for java.
No, no proxy server (my setup has direct access).
---rony
> On April 2, 2020 at 2:20:44 PM
On 02.04.2020 21:20, Johan Vos wrote:
> I have no scientific evidence for this, but I remember issues related to SSL
> with some JDK's as
> well, which may or may not be related to the cacerts file that is bundled.
When hitting this problem the JDK was the same that has worked flawlessly with
In general a discussion like this can happen in the pull request as part
of the review. All PR comments are forwarded to the mailing list anyway.
-- Kevin
On 4/4/2020 3:21 AM, Jeanette Winzenburg wrote:
as an example take f.i.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129123 (and its pull
as an example take f.i.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129123 (and its pull request
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/136 with a good starter to a
solution) has open questions - for me, at least :)
Places to discuss: the pull request? the mailing list? the issue?
Where
My use case which is driving the fix for this bug is user expectation in an
open source application (https://github.com/ccavanaugh/jgnash).
When a user makes an edit to an existing transaction, the expectation is
the prior selected ComboBox value is visible when the list is displayed,
otherwise
> This pull request fixes JDK-8129123. This bug also effects Windows and Linux
> platforms.
> Also, I believe JDK-8196037 is a duplicate of this issue.
>
> I've tested this against OpenJDK 11.0.6 on Ubuntu 18.04, Arch Linux and
> Windows 10.
>
> Thanks!
Craig Cavanaugh has updated the pull
