On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 20:21:59 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> The usual doc fixes (for OpenJFX 16).
>>
>> Can wait until RDP2 to see if something else comes up.
>
> Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Addressed review
Desktop is already a smaller market compared before. And the competition
has become toucher because of several toolkits out there - Electron,
Flutter, Compose for Desktop, etc. Hence, the need for more open and
community-driven JavaFX project.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 12:14 PM Ty Young, wrote:
> On
On 2/2/21 8:16 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
Hi Mike,
First of all, I would have you consider revisiting your medical observation
on the state of JavaFX. If you've read the almost-weekly recurrent threads
of "should I use Swing or JavaFX" in r/Java, you'd realize that reports of
JavaFX's death are
> Deprecating protected members in DateTimeStringConverter. Internal
> implementation should not be exposed (similar to `NumberStringConverter` and
> others).
Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Added javadoc deprecation
Hi Mike,
First of all, I would have you consider revisiting your medical observation
on the state of JavaFX. If you've read the almost-weekly recurrent threads
of "should I use Swing or JavaFX" in r/Java, you'd realize that reports of
JavaFX's death are greatly exaggerated. But yes, it is very
There are two separate issues here. I won't address the first point from
the initial poster, other than to say that I understand that the lack of
direct write access to JBS for occasional contributors is a pain point.
I don't think it is stopping anyone from contributing, though. As for
the
1+
Am 02.02.21 um 15:12 schrieb Pedro Duque Vieira:
Hi,
Although I don't agree with everything said here at the start of this
thread, I agree with the base idea that JavaFX would benefit from being
more open than it is currently. It's something I've already said here in
this mailing list and
Hi,
Although I don't agree with everything said here at the start of this
thread, I agree with the base idea that JavaFX would benefit from being
more open than it is currently. It's something I've already said here in
this mailing list and since it's been a while and that discussion probably
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:32:36 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
>
>
> At first, I thought this setTickLabelRotation() call violates the method
> javadoc above. On a second look, I found that the javadoc is applicable only
> if AutoRanging() is true.
> Method calls - calculateNewSpacing() and
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 23:13:02 GMT, Jonathan Vusich
wrote:
>> I do see that there are no changes from last time, which is good, so it will
>> be fine for this time.
>>
>> When ready, you can add the new test by pushing a new commit.
>
> @kevinrushforth I was not aware of that, thank you for
10 matches
Mail list logo
