Hi Jonathan,
Can you please review the fix related to TextArea:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8171229/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171229
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Jonathan, Ajit
Please review this fix:
Webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8145887/webrev.00/
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145887
Issue:
The private class SelectionListIterator implements the interface
java.util.ListItera
Hi Jonathan, Ajit,
Please review this fix,
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175963
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8175963/webrev.03/
Issue:
EventType from class ComboBoxBase were used with ChoiceBox class in
Hi Jonathan, Ajit,
Please review this bug fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090192
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8090192/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Jonathan, Ajit,
Please review a small fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178417
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8178417/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Jonathan & Ajit,
Request you to review the fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181213
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8181213/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Jonathan,
Please review the below fix,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8092206
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8092206/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Jonathan, Hi Ajit,
Request you to review this fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130904
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8130904/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Chien, Hi Kevin,
Request you to review the fix for JDK 10.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181930
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8181930/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin, Hi Jonathan,
Request you to review the fix,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8092206
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8092206/webrev.04/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Request you to review a fix:
Fix : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8177633/webrev.00/
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177633
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Please review this bug fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178418
Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8178418/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Please review the fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8172856
Webrev.00:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8172856/webrev.00/
Webrev.01:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8172856/webrev.01/
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review a small fix:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8189424/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189424
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Request you to review the following fix,
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187074
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8187074/webrev.04/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix,
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183520
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8183520/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this test bug fix,
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193426
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8193426/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8192056
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8192056/webrev.02
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8157690/webrev.00/
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157690
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this fix:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8193495/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193495
This patch also fixes an another bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.n
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8154039/webrev.00/
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154039
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix,
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193311
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8193311/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this fix,
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8195802/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195802
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin, Alan & Mandy,
Request you to review this fix:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8195800/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195800
Regards,
Ambarish
Vote: Yes
-Original Message-
From: Guru
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:12 PM
To: Kevin Rushforth
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Rajath Kamath
Vote: YES
> On 29-Mar-2018, at 10:12 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Rajath Ka
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this small fix,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198602
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8198602/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this test fix:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8196844/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196844
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8199344/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199344
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Request you to review this fix.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8202623/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202623
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this small fix:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8203365/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203365
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Ajit,
Please review this fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8200285/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200285
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin,
Please review this correction fix :
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204956
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8204956/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & All,
Please review this small corrective fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8205008/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205008
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin, Ajit,
Request you to review this fix:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8197846/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197846
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin & Jeanette,
Please review this fix:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197985
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8197985/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Please review this change for updating libjpeg7 to libjpeg9c.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8203884/webrev.00_for_checkin/ ->
Complete patch with changes in make files and Netbeans project files.
Webrev:
http://cr.
Hi All,
This email is for discussion regarding the fix
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204060 .
Issue:
Images drawn using javafx.scene.canvas .GraphicsContext::drawImage() always
apply filtering to the image.
Solution:
javafx.scene.canvas.GraphicsContext should provide an
ay, October 16, 2018 4:25 AM
To: Dan Howard ; Ambarish Rapte
; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fix proposal: boolean flag & public API for JDK-8204060 - Disable
smoothing at javafx.scene.canvas.GraphicsContext.drawImage()
Yes, it should be "isImageSmoothing", thanks for catchi
Thanks Kevin, Nir & Dan for the review.
I shall make these changes and share the fix for review on new email.
Regards,
Ambarish
From: Nir Lisker
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:24 PM
To: Ambarish Rapte
Cc: [email protected] Mailing
Subject: Re: Fix proposal: boo
Hi All,
Please review this fix:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204060
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8204060/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Please review this mac specific fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8189926/webrev.05/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189926
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Please review this correction fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8204060/8214508/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214508
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Please take a look at this bug fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8214035/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214035
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin, Ajit,
Please review this fix:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212102
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8212102/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi Kevin, Ajit,
Please review this small fix,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-822
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/822/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Please take a look at this small fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8213572/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213572
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi,
Please review this test cleanup change,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8222183/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222183
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Please review this fix,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-811
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/811/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
Hi All,
Please review this fix,
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8222457/webrev.00/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222457
Regards,
Ambarish
Vote: YES
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Rushforth
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 3:14 AM
To: [email protected]; Nir Lisker
Subject: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Nir Lisker
I hereby nominate Nir Lisker [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
Nir is an OpenJFX community member, who has con
Hi All,
Please review this fix:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209938
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/fx/8209938/webrev.00/
Regards,
Ambarish
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:04:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As indicated in the JBS bug, this makes the needed change for releasing in
> 2020.
>
>
>
> Commits:
> - 85c03ad9: 8232522: FX: Update copyright year in docs, readme files to 2020
>
> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:30:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing deadlock when calling Application.launch in the FXThread after
>> Platform.startup
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> JDK-8263322
> fi
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:35:58 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
> I think it's also quite important to support fast removing/adding subtrees.
Yes, Adding listener seems over kill here. Lets go with `WeakReference`
approach. I will take a look at the test update.
-
PR: https://git.open
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:30:58 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing a memory leak.
>> A node hard references its old parent after CSS layout and getting removed.
>> This shouldn't be the case, this is very counterintuitive.
>>
>> The fix uses a WeakReference in CSSStyleHelper for firstStyleab
utton` is created by `MenuBarSkin` to show
> a `Menu`. This `MenuBarButton` gets disposed when the related `Menu` is
> removed from scenegraph, and so the added `ListChangeListener` gets GCed.
> Hence it is not required to explicitly remove the listener.
> Added a comment explaining this beh
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:11:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> The new unit test fails on all platforms, as you can see from the GitHub
> actions log:
The test failed because, change listeners added by other tests get accumulated
in the `changeListenerMap`. These listeners can get GCed only if the
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:40:51 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is a fix for a long-standing bug where the D3D pipeline will stop
>> rendering when a Windows remote desktop session is disconnected and then
>> reconnected.
>>
>> A preliminary Draft PR #315 by @Schmidor was a good first step in
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:02:40 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing a memory leak.
>> A node hard references its old parent after CSS layout and getting removed.
>> This shouldn't be the case, this is very counterintuitive.
>>
>> The fix uses a WeakReference in CSSStyleHelper for firstStyleab
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:24:36 GMT, Florian Kirmaier wrote:
>> Fixing leak in ProgressIndicator when treeShowing is false
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8264677
> changes based on code review
Suggested
utton` is created by `MenuBarSkin` to show
> a `Menu`. This `MenuBarButton` gets disposed when the related `Menu` is
> removed from scenegraph, and so the added `ListChangeListener` gets GCed.
> Hence it is not required to explicitly remove the listener.
> Added a comment explaining this beh
utton` is created by `MenuBarSkin` to show
> a `Menu`. This `MenuBarButton` gets disposed when the related `Menu` is
> removed from scenegraph, and so the added `ListChangeListener` gets GCed.
> Hence it is not required to explicitly remove the listener.
> Added a comment explaining this beh
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:03:36 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Is there a way to test it more directly?
`ControlTestUtils` provides a way to get the number of listeners added to a
property. Please check the updated test. With this direct way, should we keep
the indirect way of testing which uses `
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:21:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This updates the compiler used to build JavaFX on macOS to Xcode 12.4 (which
> includes the MacOSX11.1 sdk), which matches the compiler that will be used to
> build JDK 17, once openjdk/jdk#3388 is integrated.
>
> As noted in the bug re
utton` is created by `MenuBarSkin` to show
> a `Menu`. This `MenuBarButton` gets disposed when the related `Menu` is
> removed from scenegraph, and so the added `ListChangeListener` gets GCed.
> Hence it is not required to explicitly remove the listener.
> Added a comment explaining this beh
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:58:14 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I'd recommend to get rid of the indirect way of testing
I have removed the indirect way, please take a look.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/429
nly the tests that extend from
> `RegionUITestBase` test class and does not affect other tests.
> Verified that `RegionBackgroundImageUITest` and `RegionBackgroundFillUITest`
> tests pass on all three platforms(except
> RegionBackgroundImageUITest.unalignedImage_Cover which fails o
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:30:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As noted in the JBS bug, the minimum macOS version on which JavaFX will run
> is currently set to 10.10 in `mac.gradle`. macOS 10.10 is many years out of
> support, so we should update this minimum. Further, macOS / aarch64 (aka
> arm6
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:40:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> As noted in the JBS bug, the minimum macOS version on which JavaFX will run
>> is currently set to 10.10 in `mac.gradle`. macOS 10.10 is many years out of
>> support, so we should update this minimum. Further, macOS / aarch64 (aka
>>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:33:08 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Each test in RegionBackgroundImageUITest makes several calls to
>> `robot.getPixelColor()` on App thread. Due to this each test requires more
>> than **60** seconds for execution.
>>
>> Fix is to save a s
nly the tests that extend from
> `RegionUITestBase` test class and does not affect other tests.
> Verified that `RegionBackgroundImageUITest` and `RegionBackgroundFillUITest`
> tests pass on all three platforms(except
> RegionBackgroundImageUITest.unalignedImage_Cover which fails on
nly the tests that extend from
> `RegionUITestBase` test class and does not affect other tests.
> Verified that `RegionBackgroundImageUITest` and `RegionBackgroundFillUITest`
> tests pass on all three platforms(except
> RegionBackgroundImageUITest.unalignedImage_Cover which fails on
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:12:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> this might be a bug in Robot itself
It seems like a robot issue. These failures can also be observed without this
change and with increased timeout (7 ms).
> The fix for [JDK-8170026](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-817002
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:35:34 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> The method `ControlAcceleratorSupport.doAcceleratorInstall(final List extends MenuItem> items, final Scene scene)` adds a `ChangeListener` on
> `MenuItem.acceleratorProperty()`. This listener is not removed when the
>
These are 2 corner case test cases for getRenderRoot() method.
1. `emptyDirtyRegion():` When the dirty region rect is empty i.e. (0, 0, -1, -1)
2. `zeroSizeDirtyRegionWithinOpaqueRegion()`: When the dirty region rect is of
zero dimensions, for example (20, 20, 0, 0)
- emptyDirtyRegion(): When the
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 02:21:50 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Added a SpotLight only to the D3D pipeline currently.
>>
>> ### API discussion points
>>
>> - [X] Added `SpotLight` as a subclass of `LightBase`. However, it could
>> also be a subclass of `PointLight` as it's a point light with direction
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:35:29 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Combined rotation and direction
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javaf
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:04:51 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Each test in RegionBackgroundImageUITest makes several calls to
> `robot.getPixelColor()` on App thread. Due to this each test requires more
> than **60** seconds for execution.
>
> Fix is to save a screen capture o
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:29:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Yes, filing a new bug to evaluate case 1 seems like the best option
Thanks for the comment, I have created a new JBS issue and updated id in the
ignore tags.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/463
n then the current
> behavior seems valid. I have added a couple more similar tests.
Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
update ignore tags with jbs id
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pul
This PR removes two benchmark tests that are ignored since they were added
[here](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/0dea6d6790ae4eeff3e5ec5a7750251caf91e40b)
test.javafx.scene.input.TouchEventTest.saneOrderingBenchmark
test.javafx.scene.input.TouchEventTest.crazyOrderingBenchmark
Since the t
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:48:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing a memory leak.
>> A node hard references its old parent after CSS layout and getting removed.
>> This shouldn't be the case, this is very counterintuitive.
>>
>> The fix uses a WeakReference in CSSStyleHelper for firstStyleab
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:12:40 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> This PR removes two benchmark tests that are ignored since they were added
> [here](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/0dea6d6790ae4eeff3e5ec5a7750251caf91e40b)
>
> test.javafx.scene.input.TouchEventTest.saneOrder
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:25:47 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> These are 2 corner case test cases for getRenderRoot() method.
> 1. `emptyDirtyRegion():` When the dirty region rect is empty i.e. (0, 0, -1,
> -1)
> 2. `zeroSizeDirtyRegionWithinOpaqueRegion()`: When the dirty region rect i
The tests that are modified in this PR set a stylesheet using API
`StyleManager.getInstance().setDefaultUserAgentStylesheet()`.
This is a global state and should be reset after execution of each test.
It does not cause any test failures currently, but this has caused a test
failure in past report
As mentioned in JBS the unit test execution fails when tests have a duplicate
package name.
This was introduced by JDK-8204568: it created a test in a new package
`test.javafx.css` in controls tests. A similar package already existed in
graphics unit tests.
This is a simple fix to rename the pac
is a simple fix to rename the package. Test is moved to existing package
> in controls test under `test.javafx.scene.control`
Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
change package
-
Changes:
- all: https:/
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:37:30 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> change package
>
> modules/javafx.controls/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:01:45 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> The tests that are modified in this PR set a stylesheet using API
> `StyleManager.getInstance().setDefaultUserAgentStylesheet()`.
> This is a global state and should be reset after execution of each test.
> It does not ca
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:49:25 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> As mentioned in JBS the unit test execution fails when tests have a duplicate
> package name.
> This was introduced by JDK-8204568: it created a test in a new package
> `test.javafx.css` in controls tests. A similar pac
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:25:48 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing leak in ProgressIndicator when treeShowing is false
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8264677
> Readded countdownlatch for onShown bas
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:48:23 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> Changes in Lambda..Handler:
>> - added api and implemenation to support invalidation and listChange
>> listeners in the same way as changeListeners
>> - added java doc
>> - added tests
>>
>> Changes in SkinBase
>> - added api (an
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:33:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This patch updates the compiler to Visual Studio 2019 version 16.9.3 on
> Windows, in order to match JDK 17 -- see
> [JDK-8265371](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265371).
>
> I ran a full build and test, including media and
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:30:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This patch updates the compiler to gcc 10.3 on Linux, in order to match JDK
> 17 -- see [JDK-8265373](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265373).
>
> I ran a full build and test, including media and WebKit.
Marked as reviewed by
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:09:54 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> Remote Desktop will change default audio device when connecting or
>> disconnecting to it's own audio device. Also, when remote desktop is
>> disconnect, then remote desktop default audio device is removed and system
>> default dev
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:58:02 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
>> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
>> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
>> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
>> the next
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:17:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This patch updates the compiler to Visual Studio 2019 version 16.9.3 on
>> Windows, in order to match JDK 17 -- see
>> [JDK-8265371](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265371).
>>
>> I ran a full build and test, including media
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:58:02 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
>> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
>> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
>> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
>> the next
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:18:59 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
>> This PR fixes the implementation of `ControlUtils.reducingChange`, which
>> incorrectly computed adjacent removed indices, thus resulting in incorrect
>> removal notifications.
>>
>> Since there were no unit tests for this method, I also added
This issue [JDK-8264157](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264157) is a
regression of [JDK-8209788](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209788),
which removed two KeyMappings from `ComboBoxListViewBehavior`. That removal was
not required to fix
[JDK-8209788](https://bugs.openjdk.j
1 - 100 of 794 matches
Mail list logo