I'm pretty burnt myself but it remains in the back of my mind and I will be
devoting some effort to it. I think this is a good email to spark me to go and
work on it. Before August is out will work on it.
Thanks!
jose
From: Daniel Zwolenski
To: Richard Ba
Many moons ago I complained about jittery PathTransition animation. A bug was
openned and I was provided a workaround. This was with Java 7. I revisted the
old project that lead to that initial complain, this time with Java 8. The
problem seems to be back. I could not find the old bug re
of 4 seconds, make these hiccups better
visible. They're most definitely there.
On 13-4-2017 08:46, Michael Paus wrote:
> It runs perfectly smooth on my old MacBook Pro from 2012 with JDK 8u152 ea.
>
> Am 13.04.17 um 04:25 schrieb Jose Martinez:
>>
>>
>> Many
Thank you Kevin.
For those interested here is the bug report:
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8178805
From: Kevin Rushforth
To: Jose Martinez
Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net"
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: PathTransit
Hello,
Shouldn't the setInput/getInput method be part of the Effect abstract class?
Even if its just there as an abstract method with no default implementation.
I cannot do simple things like this (not that this is simple, but simpler than
the alternative):
private void addNewEffect(Node node, E
imaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
}
From: Kevin Rushforth
To: Jose Martinez
Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" ; Lord Chaos
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: PathTransition jitter
And here is the direct link in JBS:
https://bugs.
match the noticed occurrences of jitter. Does this mean that
it could be a render issue?
https://pastebin.com/XjiqE9yu
From: Jose Martinez
To: Kevin Rushforth
Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" ; Lord Chaos
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 12:03 AM
Subject: Re: PathTransit
Just curious, did this make it to the 8u144 release? If not, any idea which
release (or when) we can expect it?
Thank youjose
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 08:38:41 PM EDT, Jim Graham
wrote:
Thanks Tom, I've already posted a patch for 8180938 (lazy property creation).
Check i