Well, you would certainly know - thanks.
That's very encouraging :-)
> On 11 Sep 2017, at 20:02, Johan Vos wrote:
>
> From experience, I can tell you that if you do the work and write
> high-quality code that makes OpenJFX better, I'm sure it will be possible to
> integrate it.
>
> - Johan
>
>From experience, I can tell you that if you do the work and write
high-quality code that makes OpenJFX better, I'm sure it will be possible
to integrate it.
- Johan
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:00 AM John-Val Rose wrote:
> Thanks Nir.
>
> I am very aware of the formal processes involved but also
Thanks Nir.
I am very aware of the formal processes involved but also cognisant of the
considerable time/delays and "red tape" that can be an undesirable consequence
of such formality.
I'm also not a "hope for the best" kinda guy.
I think first we really need (and really hope) someone from Ora
I don't mind giving it a go but I wouldn't like doing the work and then it
not getting implemented (if the result is a success).
Personally, I think that the first thing we should do is make a list of
what exactly it is we are trying to do if only to get a sense of the
magnitude and be sure we hav
Nir,
You're not "hijacking" anything - I think it's been established that this a
broader "3D API support" issue. In fact, even broader than that.
I'm only new on the JavaFX "scene" but I've looked through the history and
tried to analyse the present and anticipate the future.
It seems that the
